Lord of All, ruler of No One

Our journey today will take us away from the emperor Friedrich III who will spend most of the episode holed up in his castle at Wiener Neustadt, fretting and gardening. Instead we look at the dramatic life of his younger cousin, Ladislaus Postumus, king of Hungary, king of Bohemia and Archduke of Austria. This will take us back to Prague and its complex religious politics, to Vienna where the people fall for the alluring promises of a populist and to Hungary where one of the greatest generals of the age squares up against Mehmet II, the conqueror of Constantinople.

Ep. 210 – Ladislaus Postumus, Lord of all, Ruler of No One History of the Germans

Listen on Spotify

Listen on Apple Podcast

Listen on YouTube

Transcript

We do apologize for the delay to this service. We are aware that you have a choice of podcasts and very much appreciate that you have today again chosen the History of the Germans.

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans; Episode 210 – Ladislaus Postumus, Lord of all, Ruler of No One, which is also Episode 8 of Season 11, the Fall and Rise of the House of Habsburg.

Our journey today will take us away from the emperor Friedrich III who will spend most of the episode holed up in his castle at Wiener Neustadt, fretting and gardening. Instead we look at the dramatic life of his younger cousin, Ladislaus Postumus, king of Hungary, king of Bohemia and Archduke of Austria. This will take us back to Prague and its complex religious politics, to Vienna where the people fall for the alluring promises of a populist and to Hungary where one of the greatest generals of the age squares up against Mehmet II, the conqueror of Constantinople.

But before we start a quick reminder that the History of the Germans is not solely driven by my mojo, but by the generosity of our patrons. And you can become a patron too by signing up on historyofthegermans.com/support. And then I want to say special thanks to Mads H., Anne J(anssen), Henry W., Joeri N., Klaus K., Alucard Z. and Dan, who have already signed up on historyofthegermans.com/support

And with that, back to the show.

Armagnac War & Vienna Concordate.

Last time we ended on Friedrich III’s journey to Rome, a journey that brought him the imperial crown and a wife, Eleanor of Portugal. But there is no free lunch, in particular no free lunch with the pope. The price Friedrich paid for sceptre and spouse was to throw the imperial church under the not yet existing bus.

Piccolomini introducing friedrich III and Elenor of Portugal

He signed the Vienna Concordat, the treaty that would define papal-imperial relations for the next 350 years. While France, England, and other kingdoms had long negotiated agreements to keep Rome at arm’s length — limiting papal say in church appointments and the flow of funds — Friedrich’s deal granted the pope a lot. The pope could overturn local elections of bishops and abbots, if he felt another candidate was more worthy or was worth more. Cash flowed more freely to Rome than from anywhere else. 30% of papal pomp came out of the purses of imperial subjects, double of what Frenchmen or Englishmen let go south.

No surprise that anti-papal and anti clerical sentiment reached new heights, piling on to a tradition that went back to Henry IV, Fredrick Barbarossa and Ludwig the Bavarian.

Did it at least work? Did Friedrich receive a hero’s welcome? His authority restored, his common peace renewed and his Imperial courts universally recognised?

Well, not really. His failure to stop French mercenaries ravaging the southwest was still fresh in memory. No amount of imperial bling could distract from the fact that church taxes were going up, the council of Basel was dissolved and papal emissaries were picking up the most lucrative benefices.

The Armagnac War

So, no it didn’t. But then Friedrich didn’t need to be loved, just obeyed. He controlled all the Habsburg possessions, Upper, Lower and Further Austria, Tyrol, the kingdoms of Bohemia and Hungary, a powerbase strong enough to force through whatever policies he wanted to implement, right.

Well, let’s break it down. Friedrich did not own Upper and Further Austria, or Tyrol, nor was he king of Bohemia or king of Hungary. The reason he controlled these lands was as guardian of his cousins, Sigismund of Tyrol and Ladislaus Postumus. Sigismund had reached maturity and taken ownership of Tyrol in 1446.

That was a blow, but he still had the greatest of prizes, Ladislaus Postumus. We have met him briefly in the last episode, where he accomplished the greatest feat of his fairly short life, he was born. Born as the son of Albrecht of Habsburg, king of the Romans, king of Hungary, king of Bohemia, Archduke of Austria, Margrave of Moravia and, and, and.

Albrecht II

So let us trace what happened to him and the territories he had inherited up to the time Ladislaus came back from Rome with his beloved guardian. And we start with Hungary

Hungary until 1452

When Ladislaus was born in February 1440, his father had been dead for four months. His mother, daughter of Emperor Sigismund, took up the fight to defend her infant son’s inheritance — focusing first on Hungary. She had him crowned in the ancient coronation church by the correct archbishop and with the stolen crown of St. Stephen – all at the tender age of 12 weeks.

Elisabeth of Luxemburg, mother of Ladislaus

Hungary was a land dominated by about 60 magnate families who owned about 2/3rds of the land. The church, controlled by the same people owned another fifth, and the king barely one-twentieth. Peasants and burghers held what crumbs remained.

The majority of these all powerful Hungarian magnates rejected the idea of a  newborn as ruler, in particular since another attack by the Ottomans looming. In the ensuing civil war Ladislaus, his mother and her small group of supporters amongst the magnates were pushed back to Bratislava, which they could only hold thanks to support by emperor Friedrich’s brother, the archduke Albrecht VI.

Ladislaus mother died in 1442 and – as per his father’s testament and very much to the chagrin of Albrecht VI – the guardianship for the boy went to emperor Friedrich III.

Emperor Friedrich III

The big shift in Ladislau’s fortunes came in 1444 at the battle of Varna. As we heard last time, the Habsburg’s rival for the Hungarian crown, king Wladyslaw III of Poland had been killed fighting the Ottomans. It took Poland three years to install Wladyslaw’s brother, Kasimir IV on the throne, meaning there was no immediate successor in Hungary. A vacant throne plus the fear of a renewed Ottoman campaign forced the Hungarian factions to come together.

Battle of Varna

Two magnates dominated the scene

In one corner we have Ulrich, count of Celje, great-uncle of Ladislaus, whose family had risen from Habsburg vassals to imperial princes ruling lands in modern Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, and Austria. They backed Ladislaus’s claim from the very beginning — but were bitter enemies of the Habsburg Leopoldine line, to which Emperor Friedrich belonged.

Ulrich of Celje (portrait from 1700)

In the opposite corner we have John Hunyadi, a minor nobleman from Wallachia, modern day Rumania. He had made his career in the military, first in the service of Sigismund and then of Albrecht II. Whilst he was deployed in all of Sigismund’s wars, including the fighting with the Hussites in Bohemia, it was in the wars with the Ottoman Turks that he had made his name and had become immensely rich. At his death he owned 2.3 million hectares, 28 castles, 57 towns and 1,000 villages, mainly in the south of the country. Defense against the Ottomans was his lifeblood, which is why he had backed Władysław III instead of the infant Ladislaus. For that he was rewarded with command of Hungary’s armies and the title of Voivode of Transylvania.  His successful 1442–44 campaigns made him famous across Europe and forced the Turks into peace

John Hunyadi

In 1444 he followed the crusader army into the defeat at Varna — a disaster for Christendom that cost him his king, but sufficiently hard fought to halt the Ottoman advance.

With Władysław dead and no Polish successor in sight, both factions — Celje and Hunyadi — finally united behind Ladislaus. Ladislaus was still only four years old, so that a council of regents was established.

With both John Hunyadi and Ulrich of Celje supporting Ladislaus claim to the throne, one could assume the two men would now kiss and make up. But that would be misunderstanding the situation. These guys cared very little about very little Ladislaus, and a lot about who controlled Hungary. One of Hunyadi’s first actions as regent of Hungary was to try to dislodge Ulrich of Celjefrom western  Hungary, which he failed to do. From then on, the two men would be in near continuous armed conflict of varying intensity. In the meantime the regency council was dissolved and Hunyadi became sole regent of Hungary.

In 1448 Hunyadi suffered a crushing defeat by the Ottomans, which weakened his prestige. Celje and Hunyadi now stood roughly equal, and both understood that whoever controlled young Ladislaus would control Hungary.

We are heading into the 1450s and Ladislaus is slowly but surely getting closer to maturity. When Hunyadi tried to force Friedrich III to hand over young Ladislaus by force, the emperor remained stubborn. So Hunyadi went for the second best option and agreed with Friedrich III that he would not send Ladislaus to Hungary before the boy was 18.

Ladislaus Postumus

Thus, although Ladislaus was king of Hungary in name, real power rested with John Hunyadi — and that was supposed to remain so until 1458.

Bohemia before 1452

The situation in Bohemia was even more convoluted. By the end of the Hussite wars, the country was on its knees. Around 10% of the population had perished, the German minority that had dominated trade and the lucrative mining business, had been expelled. Without the contacts and expertise of German merchants and engineers, production had slowed down and trade had shrunk. The ultimate beneficiaries of the revolt were the mighty barons who had seized almost the entirety of church and crown property. The radical Hussite factions, the Taborites and Orebites had been defeated militarily and politically neutralized. Two groups remained, the old-school Catholics and the moderate Hussites going by the name of Utraquists. Their theological differences had narrowed down to the question whether the laity should be allowed the receive bread and wine during the Eucharist.

Otherwise they were almost identical; each of the factions were dominated by the barons focused solely in how they could enrich themselves at the expense of the cities and peasants. In a cruel twist of fate, the revolution that had called for freedom and equality, ended with the return of serfdom. The only major export were mercenaries, hard boiled by the endless wars and adept at the use of handguns and wagenburgs.

Hussite warriors

During his brief reign, Ladislaus’ father had relied on the old-school Catholics, whilst the Utraquists had tried to put Wladislaw III of Poland on the throne. After Albrecht’s death, the Catholics backed Ladislaus’s claim, whilst the Utraquists did not put any candidate forward. They did not mind leaving the throne vacant for a while, after all Bohemia had spent decades without a king.

Between 1440 and 1444, the barons of both sides debated the issue at several diets. The compromise they came to was to accept Ladislaus as king, not to crown him before he had reached maturity, aka not before they knew what kind of a guy he turned out to be. A delegation was sent to Emperor Friedrich III, requesting that the boy be raised in Bohemia, learn Czech, and become familiar with his future kingdom. Friedrich refused. The result was stalemate: Ladislaus was recognized but not ruling.

Friedrich III, in his function as Guardian of young Ladislaus, maintained links with the Bohemian barons. That involved for one, Ulrich of Rosenberg, the long standing leader of the catholic party and largest landholder in Bohemia. But he also built a relationship with the Utraquists, in particular with a young man by the name of Georg of Podiebrad, who in 1444 took over the leadership of his party.

Georg of Podiebrad

Georg of Podiebrad was from a rich but not very old Bohemian family. His father had fought with Jan Zizka and the Hussites right from the very beginning of the revolt. When he was 14 he took part in the battle of Lipany when a coalition of Catholics and moderate Hussites defeated the radical Taborites. In 1438 he had fought against king Albrecht II.

Immediately after he had taken over as leader of the Utraquists, Bohemia descended once more into a civil war between the Catholics and the Hussites that lasted from 1444 to 1448. George of Podiebrad emerged victorious. The diet elected him as Landverweser, aka regent of the kingdom on behalf of the still absent Ladislaus. In 1451, just before his journey to Rome, Friedrich III recognized Georg of Podiebrad in his role as regent of Bohemia.

The two men seemingly got on really well. Piccolomini, who was at the time Friedrich III’s closest advisor called Podiebrad quote: “greatly experienced in warfare and commendable for his gifts of body and mind, except that he is infected with the folly of communion under both species and Hussitism”

Austria before 1452

Now for the third part of Ladislaus’ inheritance, Austria. Here, Friedrich III showed an unusual burst of energy. While he made no serious attempt to rule as regent in Bohemia or Hungary, in Austria he did — and with good reason. Of all the Habsburg lands, the duchy of Austria was the most lucrative after the silver mines of Schwaz. How else was he to fund his various tasks as Holy Roman Emperor.

Austria, or more precisely the guardianship over Ladislaus as duke of Austria came with some heavy baggage. As many a buccaneering acquiror had found out to his or her detriment, a P&L never comes alone, there is always a balance sheet attached. And in the case of the duchy of Austria that balance sheet was very much out of balance. Ladislaus’ father, Albrecht II had borrowed from the estates on an epic scale. He used the money to wage war against the Hussites and to support his father in law Sigismund financially. There were the 400,000 florins on his wedding day to Elisabeth, but even more loans and gifts over the decades. Some of it was covered by taxation, but still a huge amount had been given to him in the form of loans.

The estates now knocked on Friedrich’s door and asked for their money back. Meanwhile law and order in the duchy had fallen apart again. A decade had passed since Albrecht II had crushed the robber barons, and Friedrich’s cautious approach — coupled with empty coffers — allowed the bandits to return#. In 1450 things got so bad, Friedrich had to get out of his lethargy. He mobilized the ducal forces and captured 60 robbers who he had executed on the market square of Vienna.

Still the locals were not satisfied. They were further enraged when they heard about the agreement between Hunyadi and Friedrich that extended Ladislaus guardianship until the boy was 18.

Things were boiling over when on October 14, 1451 Friedrich announced his departure for Rome for his imperial coronation — and that he would take Ladislaus with him.

That same day 39 lords and city representatives met at the castle of Mailberg and swore not to rest until their rightful lord, young Ladislaus, was released from the clutches of his warden and was residing again in the Hofburg in Vienna.

The movement’s leader was Ulrich von Eyczing, a member of the Bavarian lower nobility who had become immensely rich in the service of Albrecht II. Eyczing had managed Albrecht’s finances from the moment Albrecht had taken control of the duchy of Austria. Piccolomini painted him as a shrewd and money grabbing parvenu, others saw him in a more positive light. But what he definitely, was, was a man who could whip up a crowd.

On December 12th he mounted the pulpit that stood on the Am Hof Square, the largest in medieval Vienna. His speech began by ventilating the well known grievances, the unpaid debt, the bandits and the absence of a duke in the Hofburg and then went on to claim that Friedrich kept their true lord, young Ladislaus in appalling conditions, more prisoner than ward. Then in a masterstroke of political theatre he presented Ladislaus’ sister Elizabeth, wearing rags as proof of Friedrich’s avarice and meanness.

Mailberg Oath

That cut through. The oath of Mailberg was signed by another 250 nobles, towns and cities. Vienna deposed the mayor that Friedrich had just approved and replaced him with a new one who immediately renounced the city’s allegiance.

Friedrich was already en-route to Rome. He briefly considered to return and quell the revolt. But decided to press on, for one because it is never clear how long a window for an imperial coronation remains open, and also because Ladislaus was travelling with him to Rome, so whatever von Eyczing and his co-conspirators wanted to do with their rightful lord, they couldn’t.

Ladislaus was now 12 years old and as far as anyone made out, enjoyed his time in Rome and did not suffer any depravation from his older cousin, the emperor.

Return to Wiener Neustadt

in June 1452 Friedrich returned to Wiener Neustadt, with Ladislaus in tow, Ladislaus who was the nominal king of Bohemia, the nominal king of Hungary and the nominal Duke of Austria but ruled nothing. 

Friedrich III with Imperial Crown

Wiener Neustadt was Friedrich’s main residence. The town lies about fifty kilometres south of Vienna and, at the time, belonged to Styria rather than the duchy of Austria. Never at ease in Vienna, Friedrich had built himself a castle-palace there, decorated with curious monuments we will certainly return to later. The castle stood within extensive gardens, where the emperor devoted himself to his favourite pastime — gardening — a hobby his contemporaries found even stranger than his cryptic mottos and imagerie.

Burg in Wiener Neustadt

And if he had hoped he would come back to a joyous reception as the crowned emperor, he was sorely disappointed. Ulrich von Eyzing’s support in Austria had only grown in his absence. Amongst the many allies he found in Austria as well as in Bohemia, was Ulrich of Celje, the great uncle of little Ladislaus and major power player in Hungary. Ulrich had previously sought the support of Friedrich in his struggle against John Hunyadi for the supremacy in Hungary. But now he had joined the chorus of discontent, demanding the emperor hands over young Ladislaus.

For Friedrich, surrendering Ladislaus spelled the collapse of the powerbase he needed to be an effective emperor. When Friedrich III was elected in 1440 he was the most powerful Habsburg in decades if not centuries. As the eldest son of Ernst the Iron he owned Styria, Carinthia and Carniola as well as further Austria, the ancestral lands along the upper Rhine. As guardian of Sigismund of Tyrol, he controlled these rich lands, including the silver mines. And as guardian of Ladislaus he ruled the core duchy of Austria and exercised the rights of his ward in Hungary and Bohemia.

By 1452 much of that had already slipped away. He had very reluctantly released Sigismund of Tyrol from his guardianship in 1446. He had given Further Austria to his brother, Albrecht VI after the debacle of the Armagnac wars. I by the way made a mistake in one of the previous episodes where I ascribed the foundation of the University of Freiburg to Albrecht V. It was in fact Albrecht VI, the brother of Friedrich III who founded it.

If Friedrich III released Ladislaus from his guardianship, his resources would be limited to his duchies of Styria, Carinthia and Carniola, lovely places and in case of Styria prosperous, but nowhere near profitable enough to sustain imperial ambitions.

So, of course Friedrich III fought tooth and nail to keep hold of young Ladislaus and thereby his ability to rule the empire. No, of course not. He did sent a force to Vienna to suppress the rebellion, but this effort came to nought, possibly because he could not pay the soldiers. And when the two Ulrich, of Celje and of Eyzing showed up before Wiener Neustadt with an army of  4,000 militiamen from Vienna, he caved. Ladislaus moved to Vienna and for the next decade or so, Friedrich III barely ever left his beloved home in Wiener Neustadt, fretting, gardening and making babies with the lovely Eleonor of Portugal.

His inactivity was noticed all across the empire and criticism of his inability or unwillingness to discharge the duties of a nominal leader of Christendom reached a first peak when Constantinople fell in 1453 Yet neither that seismic event nor unrest at home could drag the emperor out of his flower beds.

We will explore the consequences of this long phase of imperial hibernation in the next two episodes.

Today, though, we turn to young Ladislaus, and the patchwork of lands he at least nominally ruled.

Ladislaus in Vienna

Even though the Austrians, Hungarians and Bohemians had formed a united front demanding the release of young Ladislaus, that was really the only point on which their interests aligned. Each party wanted to get hold of the rightful heir to their lands to anchor him in their culture and politics.

Ladislaus Postumus aged 17

Ulrich von Eyczing wanted him to remain in Austria to stabilise the duchy and strengthen local authority. George of Podiebrad needed him in Prague to reconcile the Utraquists and old-school Catholics under his regency. John Hunyadi, ruling Hungary in the boy’s name, wanted Ladislaus to come to Buda to legitimise his de facto power. And Ulrich of Celle wanted that too, but for himself.

Unsurprisingly these four parties fell out almost immediately. On September 6th Ladislaus entered Vienna in a grand procession, organised by Ulrich von Eitzing. Only weeks later, a Hungarian delegation arrived, demanding that their king be handed over. In January 1453, Ladislaus travelled to Bratislava to receive the homage of his Hungarian subjects, but days later he was whisked back to Vienna.

The two protagonists present in Vienna, Ulrich von Eitzing and Ulrich of Celje, clashed hardest.  Eyczing wanted the young duke to remain in Austria and restore order, while Celje urged him to pursue his rightful crowns in Hungary.

Ladislaus and his uncle Ulrich of Celje

Eitzing could not let that happen. In September 1453 he led armed men into the Hofburg at night who apprehended Ladislaus, his sister and Ulrich von Celje in their sleep. At sword point, the terrified boy was forced to dismiss his uncle from all Hungarian offices and order him to leave Vienna. The next day Ladislaus confirmed John Hunyadi as his captain general in Hungary.

Ladislaus crowned king of Bohemia

Holding a blade to one’s throat is rarely the way into a boy’s heart, which may explain why Ladislaus was somewhat less enamoured of Ulrich von Eyczing than he had been. Within weeks, the boy was in Moravia, where George of Podiebrad assembled the Bohemian barons to swear him allegiance. On October 28th he is crowned king of Bohemia in St. Veit’s Cathedral with the crown of St. Wenceslaus.

At last, he held all his titles — King of Bohemia, King of Hungary, and Archduke of Austria — though how much power came with them was another matter.

After his departure from Vienna, the estates established a council of regents that declared they would administer the  state until Ladislaus turned 20. In Hungary, John Hunyadi braced the kingdom for the next Ottoman assault that was as inevitable as drizzle in London. And in Bohemia, where Ladislaus now resided, real power lay with George of Podiebrad, whose influence grew all the greater with the young king under his roof.

The battle of Belgrade 1456

Into this already unstable situation came another wave of Ottoman attacks. Pope Nicholas V had called for a new crusade after the fall of Constantinople, but responses were tepid. Friedrich III convened  three imperial diets between 1454 and 1456, attending only one — the one held in his hometown of Wiener Neustadt. These diets painted the now familiar picture of a dithering, indecisive, and as some claimed, cowardly monarch. Whether he was indeed any such thing is not relevant, because the perception struck and the facts spoke for themselves.

When the Ottomans struck Serbia and Hungary, no help came from the empire. The Hungarians, bitterly divided, rallied around their greatest soldier, John Hunyadi.

The enemy’s target was Belgrade, the gateway to Central Europe. The city stands at the junction of the Danube and Sava, just upriver of the Iron Gates. Every crusade to the east that had not travelled by ship via Venice, Genoa or Pisa, had passed this way. Now the Ottomans were coming the other direction.

Belgrade had always been a heavily fortified town, but between 1404 and 1427 it had been turned into one of the most extensive and most advanced military complex in europe. On the hill in the centre of town stood the fortress. That was surrounded by the walled upper town which held the garrisons and armouries and then the lower town surrounded by another, a third wall with only four major gates. Two sides were protected by the rivers Sava and Danube.

Sultan Mehmed II, conqueror of Constantinople, came prepared. He brought 22 great cannon, between 20 and 200 ships to seal the river, and as somewhere between 30,000 and 100,000 men — a host nearly as large and as well-equipped as the one that had breached the Theodosian Walls.

Against him stood 7,000 men inside the city of Belgrade and two relief armies coming down the Danube river. Of the relief forces, one was Hunyadi’s professional army of veterans — perhaps 10–12,000 men hardened by decades of fighting. They had campaigned with him from 1442 to 1444, bloodied the Ottomans at Varna, and survived the disaster of 1448.

The second was a force of roughly 30,000 peasant-crusaders, inspired and rallied by the fiery Franciscan preacher Giovanni Capistrano. Few had proper weapons; many carried pitchforks and flails. They did, however, possess a makeshift flotilla — perhaps 200 small ships — to challenge the Ottoman blockade.

San (sic) Giovanni da Capistrano

The battle became part of the Hungarian national myth and was recently turned into a Netflix series called The Rise of the Raven, based itself on a series of bestselling books.

Mehmed II reached Belgrade before Hunyadi. He encircled the city by land and sealed the river. His giant cannon started pounding the town’s outside wall in preparation for a final assault. Hearing of Hunyadi’s approach, the sultan might have intercepted him — but he did not, he gambled he could take the city first. He was wrong.

Siege of Belgrade (Ottoman miniature)

When Hunyadi arrived, Belgrade was still holding out. To reach the city, he launched a daring river assault. In a five-hour battle, his ships broke through the Ottoman blockade and resupplied the garrison.

Hungarian Miniature of teh siege of Belgrade

That was a setback, but Mehmet never intended to starve the city, but to storm it. For that he needed to break the walls with his cannon, which were now pounding the walls day and night. The defenders who had cannon of their own responded in kind and killed the commander of the Ottoman forces, Karaca Pasha.

On July 21st, 1456 a breach opened, and Mehmet sent in his elite troops, the Janissaries. In a running street the Ottoman forces hacked their way towards the centre of town, one house and one street at a time. Hunyadi ordered the defenders to gather all flammable material and build barricades of tarred wood throughout the city. Wherever the Janissaries broke through, he ordered his archers to set these wooden barricades alight. A wall of fire swept through the city, cutting the attackers off. Surrounded and isolated, the Janissaries were overwhelmed and massacred.

Meanwhile their comrades fighting on the other side of the wall of fire were pinned down by the Hungarian relief forces and suffered heavy losses.

By nightfall, both sides withdrew to their camps.

The next morning, discipline collapsed. Capistrano’s crusaders poured from the gates to plunder abandoned Ottoman positions and stumbled into fresh fighting. More and more men joined from either side until it turned into a full scale battle. Capistrano could no longer hold back and the peasant crusaders stormed out of Belgrade. Hunyadi had no choice but to follow. He struck for the Ottoman artillery, expecting the Ottomans to concentrate on defending their cannon and with it their only chance to take Belgrade. That eased the pressure on the crusaders who managed to break through the Ottoman lines. They captured the Ottoman camp and Hunyadi took the artillery.

Mehmed II rallied his troops and led them personally in a counterattack. Encouraged by their sultan’s bravery his beaten-up forces recovered their camp. But they could go no further. Mehmet II had been injured in the attack and their cannon were lost.

In the night they buried their dead, put their wounded on to carts and headed back to Constantinople.

The road to Hungary remained closed. Belgrade had held. The Ottoman tide would not reach it again for another seventy years.

The Aftermath

The victory at Belgrade sent shockwaves across Europe. Pope Calixtus III, the first of the Borgias, proclaimed a perpetual thanksgiving: every church bell would ring at midday, calling Christians to pray three Our Fathers and one Ave Maria in gratitude for deliverance from the Turks. The midday bell still rings today, its origin largely forgotten.

Pope Calixtus III

As for the victors — John Hunyadi and Giovanni Capistrano — neither lived to enjoy their success. Both died within weeks, victims of the bubonic plague that swept through the crusader camp.

With John Hunyadi gone, Hungary fell into political limbo. The young king Ladislaus had left for the safety of Vienna when news of the Ottoman advance had reached Buda, but after the great victory, he returned. At sixteen, crowned and recognised, he was expected to take full control of his realm and appoint his great-uncle Ulrich of Celje as Captain General in Hunyadi’s place.

The dead hero’s sons, László and Matthias, saw danger in every move. Their father and Ulrich of Celje had been bitter enemies, and they knew the new Captain General would come for them. Ulrich of Celje soon demanded repayment of fabricated debts and the surrender of the Hunyadi estates. The claim failed, but the hostility deepened.

In November 1456, Ulrich and King Ladislaus travelled to Belgrade to take possession of the fortress, commanded by László Hunyadi. As they ascended the ramparts, their men quartered in the upper town. The next morning, László struck first: Ulrich of Celje was dead.

At first, the terrified king feigned reconciliation, even promising the Hunyadi widow that her sons were safe. But once back in Buda, he had them seized. László was condemned for murder and publicly executed; Matthias was imprisoned.

The mourning of Lazlo Hunyadi

For the first time, Ladislaus Postumus had acted like a monarch — ruthless, decisive, unflinching. But power in Hungary rested not with the crown but with sixty great magnate families, and their reaction would decide whether the boy-king ruled or merely reigned.

Ladislaus did not stick around to find out what happens to a man who kills the son of Europe’s Saviour and Hungarian National hero. He fled to Bohemia, taking Matthias Hunyadi with him as a hostage

In Prague, his regent George of Podiebrad cared less about judicial niceties and welcomed him with royal honours and arranged a glittering marriage alliance with the French crown.

Days before the nuptials, Ladislaus Postumus, King of Hungary, King of Bohemia and archduke of Austria  keeled over and died. Rumours of poison spread and persisted for centuries, until in 1984 his grave was opened and his skeleton examined. Ladislaus Postumus had died of Leukaemia.

Death of Ladislaus Postunus

And thus, most unexpectedly the boy king, the plaything of his magnates and hope of his many subjects was gone.

Who was to inherit these crowns and duchies? His closest male relative was the emperor Friedrich III. So this must be the moment the famous Austro-Hungarian monarchy came into being. Friedrich III got to rule most of Central europe, his money problems are over and the empire can be put on a track to centralisation and consolidation of imperial power. Oh boy, oh boy – next week we will see how this is so not at all happening.

And if you find supporting this show beats rooting for Friedrich III, go to historyofthegermans.com/support, where you can find various options to keep the History of the Germans on the road and advertising free.

Reichserzschlafmütze

Today we – and the Habsburgs – stride back on to the grand stage of European politics. Not with a titan of history or monarch whose long and fruitful reign resonates across the centuries, but with Friedrich III, better known as the Reichserzschlafmütze – the imperial arch sleepy head, Or perhaps more fittingly the imperial arch dawdler.

He ruled from 1440 to 1493, a total of 53 years – the longest reign of any Holy (or unholy) Roman Emperors (bar Constantine VIII). And yet, is also the most derided of reigns. In 1878 the Historian Georg Voigt sneered: “He was not remotely capable of handling such far-reaching politics, leaving Bohemia to its own devices, the Hungarian throne dispute to the helpless queen dowager, Austria to the arrogant dynasts, and the mercenary and robber bands.” “His light, simple hair, his long face with little movement, and his sedate gait betrayed a sluggish, deliberate nature, to which any enthusiasm, indeed any excitement, was alien. His love of peace has been endlessly mocked, but it was based on a completely dull sense of manhood and honour. No prince was so easily consoled by such insolent and repeated insults.” End quote.

Freidrich III

Modern historians are kinder, praising his thorough education and dogged determination to preserve what was left of the majesty of the Holy Roman Emperors. But even they can’t avoid calling him flabby, underhand and happy to sell out his friends and allies.

Not exactly the kind of guy one wants to spend three or four episodes with. But this is history, not Hollywood. The nice guys do not usually win by yanking hard on the levers of destiny. More often than not tenacious men of low cunning, who weasel their way through, are the ones who are bringing the results.

And results he did get. At the end of his reign, the empire had changed profoundly. The open constitution of the Middle Ages had given way to a denser and more structured organization.

Why and how Friedrich III – despite all his many shortcomings – got to move the needle of German history is what we will look at over the next few weeks.

Ep. 209 – The First Habsburg Emperor History of the Germans

Listen on Spotify

Listen on Apple Podcast

Listen on YouTube

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 209 – The First Habsburg Emperor, which is also episode 7 of season 11: The Fall and Rise of the House of Habsburg.

Today we – and the Habsburgs – stride back on to the grand stage of European politics. Not with a titan of history or monarch whose long and fruitful reign resonates across the centuries, but with Friedrich III, better known as the Reichserzschlafmütze – the imperial arch sleepy head, Or perhaps more fittingly the imperial arch dawdler.

He ruled from 1440 to 1493, a total of 53 years – the longest reign of any Holy (or unholy) Roman Emperors (bar Constantine VIII). And yet, is also the most derided of reigns. In 1878 the Historian Georg Voigt sneered: “He was not remotely capable of handling such far-reaching politics, leaving Bohemia to its own devices, the Hungarian throne dispute to the helpless queen dowager, Austria to the arrogant dynasts, and the mercenary and robber bands.” “His light, simple hair, his long face with little movement, and his sedate gait betrayed a sluggish, deliberate nature, to which any enthusiasm, indeed any excitement, was alien. His love of peace has been endlessly mocked, but it was based on a completely dull sense of manhood and honour. No prince was so easily consoled by such insolent and repeated insults.” End quote.

Modern historians are kinder, praising his thorough education and dogged determination to preserve what was left of the majesty of the Holy Roman Emperors. But even they can’t avoid calling him flabby, underhand and happy to sell out his friends and allies.

Not exactly the kind of guy one wants to spend three or four episodes with. But this is history, not Hollywood. The nice guys do not usually win by yanking hard on the levers of destiny. More often than not tenacious men of low cunning, who weasel their way through, are the ones who are bringing the results.

And results he did get. At the end of his reign, the empire had changed profoundly. The open constitution of the Middle Ages had given way to a denser and more structured organization.

Why and how Friedrich III – despite all his many shortcomings – got to move the needle of German history is what we will look at over the next few weeks.

But before we start let me just mention the historyofthegermans.com website. That is where you find episode transcripts complete with images of objects or artworks I mention on the show, maps and portraits as well as links to related episodes. There are season overviews, playlists by ruler, book recommendations, blogposts and lots more. If you subscribe, you get an email with the full transcript every time I release a new episode. Plus if you go there, even if you do not come to support the show, it raises the profile of the website, which means it ranks higher in Google searches, which then means more people find the show. A win-win for all of us.

And today we want to thank Lynne E., Kris S., Jacob, Simon T., Seb B. and Geert Jan K. whose generosity makes all this possible.

And with that, back to the show

The Stolen crown of St. Stephen

It is October 1439 and Albrecht, King of the Romans, king of Bohemia and king of Hungary is dead. This energetic and warlike prince was felled not by enemy action, but by dysentry he picked up on a campaign against the Turks. He was on his way to Vienna believing that if only he could once more see the walls of his hometown, he would survive. But he didn’t. His wife, the formidable Eliabeth, daughter of emperor Sigismund prevented the body of the dead king to get to Austria where he had wanted to be buried. Instead, she diverted the funeral cortege to Fehérvár (Stuhlweissenburg), the ancient burial place of Hungarian kings since Stephen I.

Elisabeth of Luxemburg

Albrecht II did not have a son when he died. But his wife Elisabeth was pregnant. Her doctors assured her the child would be a boy, a boy who was to become the heir to the crowns of Hungary and Bohemia, and the duchy of Austria.

The magnates of Hungary faced a dilemma. They were loyal to Elisabeth, the daughter of Sigismund who had ruled Hungary for half a century, and hence her son was the legitimate heir.

But then the Turkish offensive of 1439 had only stopped because of the disease. Sooner or later the Ottomans were going to be back. And probably sooner if they found out that the kingdom was ruled by a newborn. In other words, they needed a fully functional ruler.

To square the circle they suggested to Elisabeth that she should marry the king of Poland, Wladyslaw III. That would unite the forces of Poland and Hungary under a competent military leader, a leader who might even rally the feared Hussite fighters into a crusade against the Turks.

Wladyslaw III of Poland and Hungary

However, Elisabeth would not hear these more than reasonable arguments. She was convinced she was carrying a son and she did not want to squander the boy’s chances to become king – nor her chances of ruling Hungary as regent. As I said, she was a formidable lady.

Still needs must, and the Hungarians elected Wladislaw as king of Hungary and were preparing his coronation.

Elisabeth had to stop them.  How? By using – drumroll – the crown of St. Stephen. This was one of Europe’s oldest crowns—by tradition a papal gift from pope Sylvester II to King Stephen in the year 1000, though more likely made in Constantinople around 1070. Either way, it was sacred, ancient, and indispensable for a viable coronation. So Elisabeth had it stolen.

St. Stephen’s Crown

We know all about this heist, because the lady who snuck into the vaults of Visegrad castle, Helene Kottanerin, wrote it all down , how she placed some decoy ladies in waiting in the castle who let her in, how she filed through locks, removed and then replaced the seals and sewed the invaluable crown into a cushion. Now though lady Helene is adamant she brought the crown to her mistress, queen Elisabeth, safe and sound, today the cross at the top of the crown is bent. So maybe, maybe someone sat down on that cushion when he or she shouldn’t have … who knows.

The result was that Elisabeth had the crown and shortly afterwards a boy, on whose head she then placed said crown. Wladislaw III had to make do with a fake crown. But his army and his support was not fake. Elisabeth and her son, who she named Ladislaus after the saint king Ladislaus I of Hungary, came under siege in Bratislava. Very reluctantly the queen had to seek support from her husband’s distant cousin Albrecht VI, the younger son of Ernst the Iron. With his help she pushed Wladislaw III out of Western Hungary, but most of the Kingdom was lost. As for Wladislaw III, we will hear more about him in a moment.

In Bohemia, the situation was marginally better. The Bohemian estates were prepared to accept Ladislaus on condition that he would grow up in Bohemia. Plus that effective control of the kingdom was to sit with a regency council of Bohemian barons, not with Elisabeth.

Elisabeth and Ladislaus decamped to his third realm, the duchy of Austria.

Given a weak and feeble woman could not be entrusted with the affairs of the heir of so many crowns and lands, Elisabeth was forced to accept her Habsburg cousins by marriage as guardians of Young Ladislaus, best known to posterity as Ladislaus Postumus. Two years later, Elizabeth was dead and the cousins, namely the elder, Friedrich took charge of the boy.

The Youth Of Emperor Friedrich III

This Friedrich, the Vth archduke of this name, will soon call himself Friedrich III, King of the Romans. He was born in 1415 in Innsbruck just when his father, Ernst Iron had come to Tyrol to protect it against emperor Sigismund. He was tall, blond and broad shouldered, no surprise given he was the son of Cymburga of Masovia, a famous beauty who had lured his father to Krakow and into a serious disagreement with his family and whose party trick was to crack nuts with her bare hands and drive nails into walls with her fingers.

Cymurga of Masovia

Friedrich had lost his father aged 9 and his mother when he was 14. As an orphan he grew up at the court of his uncle Frederick IV’s of the Tyrol. Having reached maturity in 1430 he took over Carinthia and Carniola, two of his father’s lands, but not the much richer Styria. His uncle Friedrich IV refused to relinquish the guardianship and hence the income.

It was Friedrich’s younger brother, the already mentioned Albrecht VI who forced their uncle to give up Styria. These two brothers could not be more different. Where Friedrich tended to avoid conflict and simply waited for nature to take its course, Albrecht was a belligerent man, always ready to use force to get what he thought was his. In other words, Albrecht VI was very much the son of Ernst the Iron, whilst Friedrich, if he resembled any previous Habsburgs, was in the mold of his Albertine great uncles, who had spent their lives being pushed around by the Leopoldine dukes.

In 1436 Friedrich goes on pilgrimage to the Holy Land. On the one hand, this was an act of genuine piety, but it carried as an added advantage a ban on any attacks on his property. And such attacks were ever more likely as his relationship with his brother soured and powerful families in the neighbourhood could smell the young duke’s weakness.

In Spring 1439, Friedrich’s uncle, Friedrich IV of the Tyrol had died, leaving behind a 12-year old son by the name of Sigismund. Sigismund and the Tyrol was placed under Friedrich’s guardianship. And as we mentioned already, in 1440 the heir to king Albrecht II, the baby boy Ladislaus Postumus, had also become his ward.

Which led to the most unusual situation that for the first time in 77 years all the Habsburg possessions were under the control of just one man, Friedrich, at this point still Friedrich V, archduke of Austria. He may not be the legal owner of Austria, the Tyrol and the ancestral lands that were now known as Further Austria, but he could use all its resources for his purposes. And he was acting on behalf of baby Ladislaus in the affairs of his kingdoms of Hungary and Bohemia.

All this made Friedrich the up to this point, most powerful Habsburg.

The hesitation of Emperor Friedrich III

Which was one of the reasons that on February 2nd, 1440 the Prince Electors unanimously chose Friedrich V of Austria to be the king of the Romans and future emperor.

Ganze Seite: Miniatur (Kaiser Friedrich III. stehend mit Insignien, flankiert von seinem kaiserlichen Wappen und dem seiner Gemahlin Eleonore.

Friedrich let three months pass before he formally accepted the election. What took him so long?

One argument could have been that the title was more hassle than it was worth. Our ever present guide, Aeneas Silvio Piccolomini expressed it best when he harangued the Germans in a famous address: “you acknowledge the emperor for your king and master, nevertheless he possesses but a precarious sovereignty; he has no powers; you only obey him when you choose \ and you are seldom inclined to obey. You are all desirous to be free: neither the princes nor estates render to him what is due ; he has no revenues, no treasure. Hence you are involved in endless contests, and daily wars; hence you suffer rapine, murder and conflagrations, and a thousand evils which arise from divided authority.” End quote.

Yep, that is an accurate description.

tHE CALL FOR iMPERIAL REFORM

In the last season we have gone through our fair share of rapine, murder and conflagrations, the Mainzer Stiftsfehde, the Princes war, the wars against Jakoba of Holland, the constant internecine warfare between brothers and cousins over ever smaller territories. It all reminds one of Sayre’s law that “Academic politics are so vicious precisely because the stakes are so small”.

The absence of an effective central authority that could provide peace and justice had been a constant complaint since at least the passing of emperor Karl IV. His successors, Wenceslaus the Lazy, Ruprecht of the Palatinate and Sigismund barely ever set foot into the core regions of the empire. Wenceslaus and Sigismund were far too embroiled in peripheral matters, Bohemia, Hungary, the Teutonic Knights, the Schism. Ruprecht’s scope had shrunk to his homeland once his journey to Rome failed to get past Milan. None of them was able to impose an effective ban on feuding that was backed by an effective court system and consensus amongst the princes.

This vacuum was filled initially by the prince electors who in 1400  replaced Wenceslaus the Lazy with the less inebriated but equally ineffective Ruprecht of the Palatinate. In 1425 they tried to do the same to Sigismund but that time the emperor held out. Not that he was able to live up to expectations then, given the chaos in Bohemia and Venetian pressure on Hungary.  

From around this time intellectuals, politicians, and writers of all stripes demanded change, the famous Reichsreform, reform of the empire. Things needed to be put on an even keel. A system of courts needed to be established that prevented the endless feuding that ruined the land and weakened the empire against his enemies.

On that everyone agreed. But, as Piccolomini had said”you are all desirous to be free and seldom inclined to obey”. The constituent members of the empire, its limbs as they were called, struggled to coordinate. The Electors believed they had been put in charge and they could point to the Golden Bull as proof. But their small club excluded princes who were richer and more powerful than them, like the Bavarian Wittelsbachs and the Habsburgs. And what about the Brunswicks, Mecklenburgs, Pomeranians, The Landgraves of Hesse, the house of Anhalt, the Württembergs? They were all NFI and they didn’t like it.

The Prince Electors

Then you had the free and imperial cities, as well as those cities that were technically subject to a prince, but de facto independent, like most of the Hanse cities. And within these princely states you had their estates, as we have seen in the Habsburg lands, in Württemberg, and almost everywhere.

All of these entities needed to be slotted into a system that everyone could agree on. So, when we judge old Friedrich and say, why didn’t he sort it out right away, just think about how we would go about changing a constitution that is 200 years old and deeply dysfunctional today.

Ok, that is one huge, messy, wriggly can of worms, but not the only item in the imperial in-tray.

Chruch reform stalling – the council of basel

We still have our old chestnut, church reform. The Council of Constance, as we have seen, resolved one major issue, the schism that had produced three competing popes. But beyond that? It had been the first ever gathering of the European political, religious and intellectual elite and a massive party. But in terms of tangible progress beyond the election of pope Martin V – not much. The fundamental issues of the quality of the clergy, the trading of benefices and the greed of the prelates had not been addressed. Instead they had burned Jan Hus who had pointed out these failings with the consequences we have discussed in some detail already.

The council of Constance had mandated a series of subsequent church councils to be held to address these shortfalls. There were some failed attempts at getting things going in the decade after Constance, but in 1431 the council of Basel got together. Basel was focused on church reform and – as it had become ever more obvious that the Hussites could not be defeated militarily – resolving this crisis.

And in 1436, the council of Basel achieved at least one of these objectives. The Compactata of Prague/Basel were agreed. Bohemia returned to the bosom of mother church. Some of the moderate Hussite demands, like the eucharist in the form of bread and wine and the expropriation of the church, were granted allowing for the suppression of the more radical forces.

Council of Basel

As for item 2 on the Council’s agenda, the reform of the church, this spiralled rapidly into a bust-up with the papacy. Martin V’s successor, Pope Eugene IV, realised that a church council, in particular a sequence of church councils taking place far from Rome posed a material threat to papal authority. In particular since the intellectual leaders of the movement, the conciliarists held the view that the council as the community of all the faithful ranked above the pope.

Eugene IV first tried to simply dissolve the council, but could not cut through. Then in 1437, he ordered the council to move to Ferrara, ostensibly to facilitate an agreement with the orthodox church about ending that much older schism. Some of the prelates followed the order, others stayed behind in Basel.

Pope Eugene IV

Basel suspended and then deposed pope Eugene IV, who in turn excommunicated the Basel council. And so to put the cherry on the cake, the Basel council elected a new pope, Felix V a former duke of Savoy who had entered a monastery and was by all accounts a most pious man. The Schism is back.

This had now led to a stalemate. On one side we have the rump council in Basel, insisting it is the only true representation of the faithful, whilst the Ferrara council believed the same. So instead of two popes we now have two councils.

The imperial princes and estates who cannot agree on much did agree on one thing, that they did not want to get involved. There were lots of sympathies for the council, in particular because many conciliarists took the view that secular rulers should take charge of the management of the church. But few princes wanted to go the whole hog and firmly embed the schism as had happened when the French sided with the Avignon papacy in 1378.

So the Germans declared themselves neutral and required Albrecht II to sign a neutrality pledge as a condition of his election.

tHE OTTOMANS ON THEIR WAY

Excellent, so we have the empire in a structural bind and the church in a total mess. What else could be wrong?

Ah, yes. There are the external enemies. We already heard about the Ottomans, but there were also forces nibbling away at imperial power in the west and north. The French kings had already taken much of what used the kingdom of Burgundy and were eying Alsace. Meanwhile their cousins, the Valois dukes of Burgundy had gone from strength to strength. Holland, Seeland and Hennegau had now gone, as had Brabant. Luxemburg was close to go over and Geldern was next. As the weight of Burgundy’s possessions shifted eastwards, they wanted to shed their vassalage to the French king and become full time imperial princes, even kings.

Then in the north the Poles were taking the better half of Prussia from the Teutonic knights, whilst Scandinavian kingdoms gained footholds on the southern shore of the Baltic.

tEH lAST EMPEROR!

With three massive issues at hand, what the empire needed was the greatest emperor of all time, somebody who combined the qualities of Augustus, Charlemagne and Wu of Jin. And in their desperation the Prince electors harked back to that age-old prophecy of Joachim of Fiore that there would be a Last emperor who would go to Jerusalem and who would usher in a 1000 years of Bliss – a sort of rapture for everyone -. And through some odd iterations in 1440 it was common knowledge that that Last Emperor was called Friedrich.

The Last Emperor

And they had a Friedrich at hand, our Friedrich V of Austria. And Friedrich, blond, broad shouldered looked the part. They conveniently overlooked that he had already been to Jerusalem and nothing had happened, but maybe it will next time he goes wearing his crown.

He may have believed this prophecy himself, at least we will see later that he was prone to such tales. What he did though was take the name Friedrich III to appear closer to the legendary Hohenstaufen emperors Friedrich Barbarossa and Friedrich II, conveniently writing his ancestor Friedrich the Handsome out of history.

And did they get a new Augustus, Charlemagne and Wu of Jin? Well sort of. They got Augustus’ lack of military prowess, Charlemagne’s cunning and Wu’s problems with his own family.

But I am jumping ahead.

Friedrich’s first reforms

In truth, his reign starts quite well. He accepted the election with great pomp and circumstance. It is one of his things that despite an otherwise quite modest lifestyle, he saw the need to perform majesty and imperial power. He did not get quite as brilliant at it as his son Maximilian, but he put on some great mise-en-scene.

And one of those was his imperial progress to his coronation in Aachen. Given Sigismund’s preoccupation with Central Europe, very few people outside of Nürnberg and Regensburg had ever seen an imperial progress. These journeys carry huge importance in reaffirming imperial power and influence.

In 1442 he held court in Frankfurt. It was a brilliantly attended event where Friedrich issued the Reformatio Frederici, his first stab at imperial reform. And whilst many historians are dismissive of it and say it was just a reiteration of existing laws going back to Karl IV, Ruprecht of the Palatinate and Wenceslaus, fact is that these laws had fallen into disuse. Passing a general prohibition of feuding, safety guarantees for priests, women, merchants and even peasants as well as rules about maintaining quality of coinage must have been most welcome, even if they formally existed already. What mattered most though was whether these rules could be enforced.

Which is where his actual improvement comes in. Friedrich III established the Kammergericht as a replacement for the Hofgericht. Hof means court, as in the court of a ruler. The Hofgericht is the lawcourt of the king or emperor. It goes back to the early Middle Ages and is usually comprised of senior nobles present at the imperial court. It usually deals with conflicts arising between nobles who can only be judged by their peers.

The problem with the Hofgericht was that it required the imperial court to come around and do the judging, which was no longer happening since all the recent emperors were busy abroad. Moreover the judges were laymen, not lawyers and proceedings were rarely written up, meaning there were no precedents on which to build a robust legal framework.

The Kammergericht comes from Kammer, meaning chamber.  These are courts who met inside, in a fixed location. They are staffed with lawyers, not laymen and their proceedings are entirely in writing. The parties exchange writs and the court passes a written judgement with its reasoning. The Kammergericht was crucial in the professionalisation of justice in the empire. It established a whole new profession, the lawyers who argue their cases, not on what appears right and proper, but based on precedent and the text of the law. And that law is increasingly Roman Law as opposed to the somewhat unstructured and oral traditions of Germanic law. The Kammergericht was a big step towards Rechtssicherheit, legal certainty, knowing where to sue and being able to assess the chances of success upfront.

Before you go, oh hurrah, Friedrich III is the guy who gets it all done, we have to touch some grass. Sure he established these courts, but the enforcement of their judgements required the cooperation of the princes and in case of the electors, wasn’t even applicable to them and their lands in the first place. What it came down to was the standing and reputation of the emperor and the quality of the judgements that determined their effectiveness.

But still, I would argue this is a tik in the well done box for the much maligned emperor Frederick III.

Sadly, it will be a while before the next tik appears.

The Battle of varna

Coming down from his coronation in Aachen and his promulgation of his imperial reforms, Friedrich went to tackle the second problem, the pending schism.

On his way to Basel he took a detour around Switzerland, where there were still some places with Habsburg sympathies. Even Zurich, formally member of the Old Confederation, opened its gates and received the emperor with great fanfare. When he got to Basel, his welcome was again enthusiastic. The council fathers may have hoped the emperor would after all side with them against the pope. But something most have gone wrong during the meetings. All we are told is that Friedrich left in haste, and shortly afterwards their pope Felix V packed his bags too and returned to Savoy. These two events seriously harmed the standing of the Council of Basel. And that of Friedrich himself who was supposed to be neutral, and instead had messed things up.

On the positive side, Friedrich picked up one of his most important advisers in Basel, and that is none other than friend of the show Silvio Aeneas Piccolomini. Piccolomini had been an avid defender of conciliary ideas and even served as private secretary to antipope Felix V. But by 1443 he was disillusioned and was seeking a way back into the papal grace.

Back home in Austria the emperor was confronted with news out of Hungary.

As we mentioned most of Hungary was now under the rule of Wladislaw III, who was also king of Poland. And he had been quite successful in repelling the Turks who had once again tried to take Belgrade and Transylvania.

In 1444 the pope Eugene IV believed it was time for a final push to drive the Turks out of the Balkans and relieve Constantinople, whose orthodox ruler had just agreed to submit to the Western church. And things looked promising as the Ottoman empire was ruled by a 12 year-old boy, Mehmed II, whose father had just resigned.

A crusade was called. An army assembled comprised of Hungarians, Poles, Bohemians as well as the Teutonic Knights, Venetians, Burgundians, Serbs and of course Vlad II Dracul, the voivode of Walachia. Friedrich and the empire stayed well clear of these events.

The battle that took place at Varna on the Black Sea was exceptionally bloody with huge casualties on both sides. Still the crusaders lost. The young king of Poland and Hungary fell, his body was never found. The Ottomans returned in 1448 and swiped up much of the remaining Balkans up to Belgrade. The defeats meant that when Constantinople was attacked in 1453, no European forces came down landside to relieve what was left of the Byzantine empire, bringing an end to a 1000 years of history and one of my favourite podcasts, the History of Byzantium.

Friedrich’s lack of support to the crusade was not yet such a big deal as the German lands west of Bohemia and Austria still felt covered by a wide buffer zone, but that would change.

The Armagnac War

It was another invasion that got the empire falling out of love with Friedrich, not only because it was closer to home, but also because he himself had triggered it.

Friedrich was after all not just king of the Romans but also a Habsburg. And as such he wanted his ancestral lands back from the Swiss confederation. That is what his trip to Zurich was about. Zurich had fallen out with the other members of the Swiss confederation over some land – as one would. Zurich then sought support from the Habsburgs, specifically Friedrich III. Friedrich was more than happy to oblige in exchange for the return of their ancient homeland.

Switzerland after Sempach

The other Swiss saw that as a fundamental betrayal and a civil war broke out. The Confederates besieged Zurich. Zurich appealed to Friedrich for help. Friedrich was broke. Just in case you were wondering he was and will remain broke, as will most Habsburgs through the centuries. It is a bit of feature, like the lip.

Siege of Zurich

Unable to muster an army he could send to relieve his allies in Zurich, he wrote or had his chancellor Piccolimini write a letter to all of europe. In this letter, formally addressed to king lark VII of France he described the Swiss Confederation as an abomination that threatened the very foundations of late Medieval society. Every Christian ruler had a duty to suppress them and return the world back to its god-given structure.

Whether King Charles VII of France was stirred by his Christian duty or more mundane matters is not for me to judge. He did answer the call and sent an army of allegedly 20,000 to Switzerland. This was a particularly rough lot that went by the name of Armagnacs, mercenaries from all across europe who had got their stripes during the Hundred Years war which was winding down.

Charles VIII of France

The dauphin of France took these mercenaries to Switzerland. As it happened they did not get much beyond Basel where the Swiss were waiting for them. The battle ended in a draw, yes, dear Swiss listeners, it was a draw. Of the 2,000 Swiss, 1,500 lay dead, but the losses for the mercenaries were maybe four times higher. The Armagnacs had enough and retreated into Alsace.

Money to pay them did not arrive, so these guys did what these sort of people always did, they took whatever they believed they were owed from the locals. Their French commanders did not mind as long as they did not do this sort of thing back home in France. The locals, many of whom were living on Habsburg land asked their lord and emperor for help. Friedrich froze, his plan to get free soldiers had backfired badly. He did not know what to do and busied himself with standard administration and the lawcourts, pretending it had nothing to do with him. Meanwhile his own lands and the empire in the west was ravaged by French soldiers. A year after the Armagnacs had appeared, and no imperial help appeared, the local lords took the initiative, led by the Count Palatine, mustered forces to get rid of them. And a few weeks later the Armagnacs returned to France and were reintegrated into the French armies.

Teh Armagnac war

These disasters wiped out whatever goodwill Friedrich had had in the empire. Nobody believed any more that he would bring about 1000 years of bliss. The number of cases brought before his brand new law courts dropped by 2/3rds. At the imperial diets he had enjoyed up until then, he was now on the back foot, having to defend his position.

Things were dire.

The Journey to Rome and teh Vienna Concordat

He needed to break out of this rut. And soon. His cousin Sigismund had now grown up and the Tyrol was no longer under his control. And even little Ladislaus wasn’t that little any more. The day wasn’t far when he might have to give up control of the duchy of Austria and whatever role he now played in Hungary and Bohemia.

He saw one road to get back. It was a road many of his predecessors had travelled, though very rarely with much success. And that road was the road to Rome. He wanted to be crowned emperor. That would rebuild his prestige and give him back the room to manoeuvre that the Armagnac war had cost him.

But there was an issue. The pope was not going to crown him unless the schism was resolved. Eugene was clear, dissolve the council of Basel and I crown you, but not before. The Council of Basel was rapidly losing ground and even its supporters were coming round to the idea that a compromise with pope Eugene IV needed to be found. The question was, on what terms.

Since the council of Constance several European monarchies had made arrangements with the papacy that regulated the influence of Rome in matters of what would rapidly become national churches. For instance France had issue the pragmatic sanction of Bourges in 1438 that removed almost any papal influence over the Gallican church, in particular cut Rome off from the income of the French church. England had passed the statute of provisors and the statute of Praemunire even earlier in 1351 and 1353, limiting papal influence in the election of bishops and abbots.

It was therefore rational for the Imperial church to expect a similar arrangement to be negotiated by their emperor, Friedrich III. The three main areas of contention were, a) who elected bishops and abbots, b) the payment of the so-called annates, the passing through of the first year income of a benefice to Rome and c) the practice of benefice holders to appoint someone else to perform the office they were appointed to.

The settlement that Friedrich and his aides negotiated said that

a) elections of bishops and abbots should be free, however, the pope can overrule them if he has a worthier candidate,

b) that with the exception of a listed set of bishoprics and abbeys, annates have to be paid to Rome, and on

c) that the ban on having stand-ins was lifted.

Basically, Friedrich III handed pope Eugene everything and the kitchen sink. The pope had much more influence on church appointments in the empire than he had elsewhere in europe. Moreover, his fiscal powers, in particular annates and indulgences were a significant burden. On some rough estimates the empire now covered 25-30% of papal income, far more than France and England. This agreement that went on to become known as the Konkordat of Vienna did resolve the conflict for now, but started another, more underground movement where broad sections of the clergy and the population complained bitterly about the overbearing influence of Rome, adding to the undercurrent that broke through in the Reformation. So, nobody can tell me that Friedrich III’s reign had been of no consequence.

Coronation of Friedrich III in Rome

So, what did he get in return. Two things he really cared about. The first was control of the church in the Habsburg lands, including the establishment of the much longed for bishopric of Vienna. 80 years ago his great uncle Rudolf the Founder had built the church of St. Stephen in Vienna as a cathedral, complete with cathedral canons, but no bishopric had been forthcoming. Friedrich III fulfilled this long held ambition.

And the other concession he received was his coronation as emperor. He travelled to Rome, bringing with him his whole family, his brother Albrecht VI, and his wards, Ladislaus Postumus and Sigismund of the Tyrol. And to complete the picture he got married there too, to Eleanor of Portugal. He was already 38 years old and this was the first time he got married. As with his general sluggishness, his libido was modest. Ther are no reports of any relationships before or after his marriage to Eleanor, something quite unusual at the time. His uncle and nephew of Tyrol were known for their extracurricular activities, as was his brother.

Friedrich III being introduced to Eleanor of Portugal

On March 19, 1452 he was crowned emperor in St. Peters in Rome, as was his wife. His family stood by him in a great display of Habsburg unity. The coronation was followed by splendid festivities hosted by the new pope Nicolas V. This must have been the most harmonious imperial coronation ever. It was also the last ever to take place in Rome and the last that was considered a true elevation in rank. Friedrichs successors will call themselves emperors from day one. No papal confirmation required.

And as the procession was trundling back home towards Austria, Friedrich may be contemplating whether his newfound status as emperor plus the elevation of Vienna as a bishopric was worth throwing the German church under the bus. Well, the answer to that will be in next week’s episode. I hope you will join us again.

And if you find all of this worth supporting, go to historyofthegermans.com/support, where you can find various options to keep this show on the road and advertising free.

King Albrecht II

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 208: Boy meets princess, boy becomes king also Episode 6 of Season 11: The Fall and Rise of the House of Habsburg.

Last week we saw the family slowly climbing out of the hole that Friedrich IV of the Tyrol had dug them. But despite all these consolidation efforts, the family was still in the second league of European princely families.

Then, just 25 years after Ernst the Iron married down into minor Polish royalty, his first cousin once removed, Albrecht V became King of Hungary, King of the Romans and King of Bohemia, all in one single year, 1438. 

How was that possible? Here is friend of the podcast, Eneas Silvio Piccolomini summarizing events: quote

Albrecht grew up and married Elizabeth, daughter of King Sigismund. She was a very beautiful woman, who lived with him most virtuously. After the Bohemians had turned to heresy and terrorised all their neighbours with wars, he alone, with great strength, protected Moravia and Austria, and the damage he inflicted upon the Bohemians was not less than the damage he took from them.

He was always in arms and, like the Bohemians, used waggon formations in battle. Making his soldiers undergo hard military training, Albrecht was the only one of all their neighbours whom the Bohemians feared, having been often defeated by him and put to flight.

When his father-in-law Sigismund died, the Hungarians soon called him to the kingship, and the Bohemians followed suit. Thus, in a very short time, he gained two large kingdoms. In the meantime, the electors of the Empire, having heard about Sigismund’s death, elected Albrecht as King of the Romans and sent their decree to him in Vienna.” End quote

Bish bash bosh – that is it, end of episode. Thanks for coming. OK, maybe we have to go with Skipper from the Penguins of Madagascar and demand: Kowalski- Analysis.

Listen on Spotify

Listen on Apple Podcast

Listen on YouTube

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 208: Boy meets princess, boy becomes king also Episode 6 of Season 11: The Fall and Rise of the House of Habsburg.

Last week we saw the family slowly climbing out of the hole that Friedrich IV of the Tyrol had dug them. But despite all these consolidation efforts, the family was still in the second league of European princely families.

Then, just 25 years after Ernst the Iron married down into minor Polish royalty, his first cousin once removed, Albrecht V became King of Hungary, King of the Romans and King of Bohemia, all in one single year, 1438. 

Karel Svoboda: Coronation of Albrecht II as King of Bohemia

How was that possible? Here is friend of the podcast, Eneas Silvio Piccolomini summarizing events: quote

Albrecht grew up and married Elizabeth, daughter of King Sigismund. She was a very beautiful woman, who lived with him most virtuously. After the Bohemians had turned to heresy and terrorised all their neighbours with wars, he alone, with great strength, protected Moravia and Austria, and the damage he inflicted upon the Bohemians was not less than the damage he took from them.

Albrecht II and Elisabeth of Luxemburg

He was always in arms and, like the Bohemians, used waggon formations in battle. Making his soldiers undergo hard military training, Albrecht was the only one of all their neighbours whom the Bohemians feared, having been often defeated by him and put to flight.

When his father-in-law Sigismund died, the Hungarians soon called him to the kingship, and the Bohemians followed suit. Thus, in a very short time, he gained two large kingdoms. In the meantime, the electors of the Empire, having heard about Sigismund’s death, elected Albrecht as King of the Romans and sent their decree to him in Vienna.” End quote

Bish bash bosh – that is it, end of episode. Thanks for coming.

OK, maybe we have to go with Skipper from the Penguins of Madagascar and demand: Kowalski- Analysis.

But before we dig into the reasons for Albrecht’s meteoric rise, let me tell you about something I noticed recently. Apple releases information’s to podcaster about the percentage of an episode listeners consume on average. This number is consistently above a 100% for episodes at the History of the Germans. I have been wrecking my brain how that can be the case. But I think I found the cause. Many people use podcasts to fall asleep to, I do it too. There is even a word for this, ASMR and people make shows specifically for that purpose. Now I have been told by listeners that they love falling asleep to the sound of my voice, which is a bit weird, but nothing to be ashamed of. And that may explain the 110% consumption rate as people doze off to an episode running the second time. And if you are one of them, you may enjoy the fact that my monotonous droning on is never interrupted by enthusiastic endorsements of random consumer goods and services.

Therefore as you now wake up, thank Colin G., Henrik F, Thies, Silke H., Fisherman’s Fencer, Kristian S. and Adrian H. who have gone to historyofthegermans.com/support and made a generous contribution to your undisturbed sleep. 

And with that, back to the show

This story of boy meets girl, boy becomes king fits just a bit too neatly into the “You Happy Austria marry” trope. Rising from middling prince in the empire to ruler of three kingdoms is a process much lengthier and much more complex than just saying “I do” to the most suitable spouse and then be extremely lucky – though I cannot recommend both of these highly enough.

Albrecht V of Austria succeeded the emperor Sigismund as King of the Romans, Hungary and Bohemia on the back of decades, if not centuries of negotiations, hard grind, ruthlessness and skill, plus the political necessities of the time.

To make it easier to understand I have broken it down into five components, namely

  1. his legal claim
  2. his personal relationship with Sigismund
  3. a lot of money, some of it dirty,
  4. the geostrategic situation, and
  5. Albrecht II being the right person at the right time

The Erbverbrüderung

Lapsed lawyer that I am, I start with the fine print, the Habsburg family claim to be the rightful heirs to the imperial Luxemburg dynasty.

That goes back to 1364, when emperor Karl IV and duke Rudolf IV of Austria signed what is called an Erbverbrüderung, a treaty between both families whereby they designate each other as heirs to all their lands and title. Basically, if you no longer produce male heirs, then I will get all you got and in exchange, if my family dies out, your heirs get all of mine. That agreement was renewed several times and formed the legal basis for Albrecht inheriting the lands and titles of the emperor Sigismund in 1437 – alongside his marriage to Sigismund’s only child that is.

Such mutual designations are actually not that rare. They were basically insurance against the emperor swooping in and grabbing your lands if your family tree withered. Because normally if there were no heirs, their fiefs would become what is called vacant. These lands and titles would then revert to the emperor who then had one year to enfeoff it to someone else. In the olden days that someone else had been the most worthy of the nobles. Though nobody can tell when these Olden Days were, because ever since the starting point of this podcast the emperors regularly passed vacant fiefs on to friends and family. It was during the Interregnum that this process went into overdrive. Rudolf I took Austria, Adolf of Nassau tried Thuringia, Albrecht I yearned for Bohemia, Henry VII got Bohemia and Ludwig the Bavarian snatched Tyrol, Brandenburg and Holland. The imperial princes hated that. They came up with these agreements designating each other as heirs. That way there was always an heir, the fief would never become vacant and the emperor could not get his greasy paws on it – problem solved.

Eventually, princes realized these pacts were even better as political currency. Promising your land to another dynasty in some distant, heirless future didn’t cost you a thing. But it bought you an ally right now. Plus an option to get hold of your neighbours territory. No surprise then that there were Erbverbrüderungen  everywhere, between Brandenburg and Poland, between Hessen and Thuringia, between Kleve, Julich and Berg and this one, between the Habsburgs and the Luxemburgs.

Sometimes these deals paid off big time. Sometimes they fizzled out. Sometimes they sparked wars when other claimants (cadet branches, sons-in-law, or the estates who thought they should get a say) got fed up with being shunted aside.

As always with these kinds of documents: they provided legitimacy, but they only mattered in the real world if you could back them up with either cold hard steel or the warm glow of gold, or both..

Back to the 1364 arrangement between Luxemburgs and Habsburgs. At first glance it looks like a fantastic deal for the Habsburgs. The Luxemburgs were Kings of Bohemia, dukes of Luxemburg, about to become margraves of Brandenburg and held a string of possessions all the way from Prague to the French border, whilst the Habsburgs had just Austria, Styria, Carinthia  and their homeland on the Rhine. Moreover, there were three Habsburgs signing the Agreement, Rudolf IV and his brothers Leopold III and Albrecht III, and all three of them were young and as it turns out, able to produce sons in as we saw unhealthy quantities. Meanwhile the Luxemburgs were Karl IV and his brother Johann-Heinrich, who between them had produced only one male heir so far, the future Wenceslaus the Lazy. And they were both in their forties, comparatively old for the age.

An amazing feat of negotiation. Rudolf IV had done it again, the great forger had outwitted the shrewd emperor Karl IV. Hang on, not so fast. We all know Karl IV and honestly, him being screwed over by a 25-year old duke with dubious classical knowledge, that was not likely.

And if you read the fine, fine print you see why it was Rudolf and the habsburgs who got the shrt straw, not the Luxemburgs. In the agreement the Habsburgs promised to give the Luxemburgs their duchies in case they died out, but the Luxemburgs would only hand over the goods if they died out and the Anjous of Hungary died out as well.

And then there was another snag. The most valuable piece of the Luxemburg inheritance was the kingdom of Bohemia. Now Bohemia had an ancient right to choose its own king, a right that Karl IV had to formally acknowledge (see episode 154 and 158 for more detail). And these ancient rights superseded not just legally but also practically any arrangement about mutual inheritance Karl IV may have entered into.

So, net, net, the Luxemburgs offered no more than a vague chance of getting back to the top, whilst the Habsburgs, were they to die out, which had almost happened just 20 years earlier, Karl IV’s family would get Austria, Styria, Carinthia etc., no questions asked. And best of all, the Habsburgs, once a powerful player in the three body problem of the 14th century were now put before the Luxemburg bandwagon, forever snapping at that elusive carrot.

Well, we do know they did get the carrot in the end, but only after a whole lot of pulling and snapping.

The personal relationship

When the Erbverbrüderung that tied the Habsburgs to the Luxemburgs was signed, Sigismund was not even yet born. But throughout his career the Albertine line of the Habsburg had done its fair share of pulling and snapping at carrots.

There was a bit of a hiccup when Albrecht’s grandfather, Albrecht III, promised Sigismund a whopping sum of 100,000 florins for the crusade against the Turks in 1396.  The money never showed up. The crusade went ahead anyway and promptly ended in the disaster of Nikopol — not because of empty pockets, mind you, but because of knightly exuberance and arrogance (episode 168).

So despite the disappointment, the alliance held. Sigismund renewed the inheritance pact, this time with archdukes Wilhelm, Leopold IV and Albrecht IV. Plus, the deal was getting juicier for the Habsburgs. None of the current generation of Luxemburgers had managed to make any baby boys. Things got real and detailed provisions were made as to who gets what. Hungary, Sigismund’s crown jewel, was to go to Albrecht IV, the father of our Albrecht. Sigismund even got the Hungarian magnates to approve the succession and made Albrecht IV his viceroy in Hungary. Sadly, Albrecht IV wasn’t exactly a star hire. When Ladislaus of Naples invaded Hungary, he basically stood there holding Sigismund’s coat while things went sideways. (episode 169).

Things went further south when Sigismund’s brother Wenceslaus escaped from his Austrian prison under mysterious circumstances (episode 206). The Habsburg dukes, Leopold, Ernst and Albrecht’s father, duke Albrecht IV, came to Sigismund and said sorry. But only Albrecht meant it. When Sigismund asked his Habsburg allies to help him against some marauding robber barons in Moravia, only Albrecht IV showed up. The cousins stayed well back – with good reason.

Albrecht IV

The chronicler Thomas Ebendorfer tells us what happened next. While encamped before the robber’s castle, the duke and the king shared a cup of wine, a cup that contained poison. Sigismund survived thanks to the tried and tested method of being strung up by his feet which forced the poison out of his body. This method had once saved Albrecht’s ancestor, the king Albrecht I, even though it cost him an eye, but was not applied to duke Albrecht IV. Albrecht was left to digest the poison, which also came with a dose of dysentery, which finished him off.

That left behind a 7-year-old heir, the hero of our story, little Albrecht V. Given the circumstances one would hope that Sigismund felt some kind of responsibility for the orphaned son of his faithful ally. Whether or not he could afford such sensibilities or not, he came to young Albrecht’s aid, when the dukes Ernst the Iron and Leopold the Fat devastated his duchy of Austria in a feud over his guardianship – again episode 206 for more detail.

In 1408 Sigismund ordered Ernst and Albrecht to stop ruining their cousin’s land and also to let him rule his duchy when he turned 14. And to again quote Piccolomini: “ When he (that is Albrecht)  attained puberty and his subjects asked for him, Leopold put him under stricter guard and resisted his release, which gave rise to a serious conflict. In the end, the senior Lord of Walsee freed him from the hands of his guardian when, under the pretext of a hunt, he took Albrecht with him and brought him to Vienna. Thus the youth took up his rule, relying heavily on the advice of the man who had liberated him.”. As we mentioned in episode 206, this sequence of events made duke Leopold the Fat explode, or more accurately, implode in anger.

From then on, Sigismund and the Austrian dukes from the Leopoldine line, namely Ernst the Iron and Friedrich IV, were at each other’s throats. The wider Habsburg -Luxemburg Alliance had splintered.

Estranged from the rest of his family, still barely 15, Albrecht grew ever more attached to Sigismund. This link was further encouraged by the Austrian estates who had a strong influence over the young duke, not least because they had freed him from the control of his cousins.

In 1411, the year he took charge of his duchy was also the year he got engaged to Sigismund’s daughter, the 2-year old Elisabeth. Given this was Sigismund’s only child at the time, this looks like a major commitment on behalf of the King of Hungary and King of the Romans. Though again, by this time the Habsburgs are in a lower league of princes and engagements with them can be broken, should a more promising opportunity present itself. It was more a “save the date” than a formal invite.

In 1412 Albrecht and Sigismund meet at his grand gathering with the king of Poland at Buda where they both sign an agreement of mutual support against any and all adversaries, which angered the Austrian cousins, in particular Ernst the Iron. Albrecht now Team Sigismund all the way, even against his own family.

Ernst the Iron and his wives

Then it seems they did not meet for quite some time. Albrecht V is not recorded as having taken part in the council of Constance, and if he did, he did not do anything of significance. This is odd given Constance is not that far from Vienna, it was the biggest party of the century and the political high point of his friend and mentor. But then it was also the place where Sigismund had humiliated his cousin and with him the family name.

Next thing we hear about him is in 1418 when he initiated a fundamental reform of monastic discipline. He started with the grandest monastery in his lands, the abbey of Melk, still one of the most impressive sights in Austria. These reforms were part of a broader European move to bring back the strict adherence to the rule of St. Benedict. As we have seen before, living by monastic rules is not just hard, it is pretty close to unbearable, which is why discipline kept deteriorating after every reform push. By the early 15th century things had swung very far the other way and discipline in many monasteries had become exceedingly lax. This was one of the issues that Wycliff, Hus and his successors had highlighted and that animated the Hussite revolt.

Stift Melk

Albrecht’s reforms were successful. The so-called melk reforms spread across Austria and Bavaria and monastic life flourished – at least for a while, before it became unbearable again. That was a great feather in the cap of our young and ambitious duke Albrecht.

In 1419, Albrecht gets another step closer to the dangling carrot. Sigismund came to visit him in Vienna they set a date for the wedding, the spring of 1422, when Elisabeth will reach the ripe old age of 12. We are moving from rather loose promise to serious commitment.

This decision cost Sigismund dearly. His wife, Barbara came from the family of the counts of Celje who had wriggled out of Habsburg overlordship and stood in firm opposition to the Austrian dukes, all three of them. Some argue that it was a disagreement about the Habsburg wedding of their only child that led to the serious marital rupture, though the gossip mills claimed infidelities on her part. In any event, the marriage was in dire straits which reduced the probability of the imperial couple producing another child, let alone a male heir. So Albrecht wins twice. Episode 184 if you are looking for more detail on the German Messalina”.

Barbara of Celje

1419 is also the year when men fell out of windows in Prague and the Hussite revolt is getting going. This revolution is followed by a lengthy war which will be where Albrecht becomes not just a protégé but an indispensable ally to Sigismund.

First Prague defenestration (1419)

As we have done a whole season on these dramatic events (episodes 164 to 184), we will only touch on the key moments and Albrecht’s role in them.

Albrecht participated in every one of Sigismund’s attempts to regain Bohemia. He came on the first crusade in 1420 (episode 177) .

Spring 1422, the date set for the nuptials with Elisabeth of Luxemburg came and went. What was going on? Given the convoluted situation in Bohemia, Sigismund’s advisers suggested very strongly to break the engagement with Albrecht and seek a marriage alliance with Poland. Poland was Bohemia’s neighbour to the North and East, a large and populous country and one of their princes had become a major force in Bohemian politics. In other words, Poland could offer a peaceful route back to Prague.  

Sigismund decided against the soft Polish option and honoured his commitment to Albrecht V. Though not for free. A loan of 400,000 florins, a truly astronomical sum was granted, enough to muster a huge army to take Bohemia back by force.

Albrecht II and Elisabeth

This may have been a political decision, but it was also a personal one. There is a personal warmth between them that went beyond the usual relationship between inlaws. Even before the marriage, Sigismund called him his “beloved son of Austria” and for the next decades builds him up as his heir and successor. He might have been the son he never had.

That being said, the two men were very different. Sigismund was often distracted and struggled to stick to his objectives, whilst Albrecht was clear, determined and focused on long term outcomes, Albrecht was a profoundly pious man who cared about the afterlife, whilst Sigismund was a cynic who used the schism as a tool to elevate his position, Sigismund was constantly chasing skirts, whilst Albrecht was a dedicated husband, and Albrecht was an able military commander much revered by his men, whilst Sigismund was a disaster.

Albrecht II

And that he proved beyond doubt when he took Albrecht’s money and hired a massive army he led to wreck and ruin at Kutna Hora and Nemecki Brod (episode 181)

Sigismund

After that Sigismund would never again lead a major military action. Which meant he needed able military men who could keep the pressure on the Hussites, if not to defeat them.

One was the elector of Saxony in the North and the other one was his son-in-law, Albrecht, duke of Austria. Albrecht became first governor and in 1424, margrave of Moravia. For the next decade, Albrecht would hold this frontier against Hussite incursions and would stage the occasional attack into Bohemia.

Hussite warfare

Even though he lost battles more often than he won them, his military record stood head and shoulder above his peers. There were in total five crusades into Bohemia, some involving huge armies. And all of these armies literally ran away when they only heard the banging of the enemy drum, a drum the story goes was made from the skin of the genius Hussite commander Jan Zizka. Albrecht’s forces stood their ground. They learned to fight like the Hussites, with guns and wagenburgs. He trained his men so that he could coordinate between infantry, artillery and cavalry, making him one of the most admired commanders of his age.

Money, dirty money

Albrecht may have been a military prodigy, but genius does not pay the bills. Sigismund was always cash strapped and could never have have paid for the armies that held back the Hussites. All Sigismund could offer was titles and a promise of inheritance.

The money therefore had to come from Albrecht’s duchy of Austria. And just from the duchy of Austria. The silver mines of Schwaz, that fountain of ready cash was out of reach – in the hands of Albrecht’s cousin Friedrich IV who had no love lost for neither Sigismund nor for Albrecht.

So where did the money come from? Well, one chunk of cash came from the darkest chapter of Albrecht’s life – the Vienna Geserah of 1420/21.

On May 23rd, 1420 Albrecht passed an order that all jews in Austria should be apprehended. Those who would accept baptism were freed, those who did not were to be expelled if they were poor and shoved onto rudderless boats floating down the Danube all the way to Bratislava.

The legal reason for these arrests shifted around a lot. Initially he claimed the Jews had sold weapons to the Hussites. Later he accused them of desecrating the Holy Host. The wealthy jews he had kept in prison were tortured, ostensibly to coerce them to get baptised, but in truth he was after their hidden treasures.

It got even uglier. He threatened to baptize children by force, which drove many to suicide. The rabbi himself killed children to spare them and then burned himself alive. Albrecht locked the remaining children in the synagogue, starving them while offering to sell them.

These atrocities were too much even for the pope, who declared all forced baptisms null and void and ordered Albrecht to stop. Still, at Easter 1421, Albrecht ordered the burning alive of 212 jews and another 21 were killed a few days later. They also burned the churchwarden who allegedly sold the jews the host they allegedly desecrated.

Burning of Jews in Schedelsche Weltchronik

Such pogroms had been quite common in the wake of the Black Death almost a century earlier. But by the 15th century they had become rarer, simply because there were a lot fewer Jewish communities still operating in the empire. Many had fled to Poland where they were welcomed with open arms.

What makes the Vienna Geserah unusual apart from the date was the allegation of co-operation with the enemy and the quite blatant financial motivation.  

Now, did this brutality make Albrecht rich? Not really. By the 15th century, Jewish communities had already been pushed out of big finance. Italian and German bankers had taken over lending to nobles, merchants, and princes with clever loopholes around the ban on usury. Jews were largely stuck with lending to the poor — a thankless and unprofitable job that made them easy scapegoats. So, whatever Albrecht squeezed out of Vienna’s Jews was a one-time payout and probably vanished quickly into military expenses.

Breughel: Tax Collectors

So, where did the rest of the money come from? Well, where money for war comes from today, taxes. Albrecht called the estates of Austria almost every year, asking for more and more cash. And, they paid up. The Hussites were a real threat, regularly raiding Austria, and Albrecht had a reputation as a commander who could actually protect them.

Old Landhaus of Lower Austria – Seat of the Estates

The result? A stronger, more professional administration in Austria. Local troops were trained in Hussite-style tactics, robber barons were crushed, roads became safer, and despite constant war, the duchy flourished. More prosperity meant more taxes, which meant more soldiers, which allowed Albrecht to make himself ever more indispensable to his father-in-law.

The geostrategic logic

All that put Albrecht into pole position to inherit Sigismund’s lands and titles. He had the paperwork (the Erbverbrüderung), the marriage (Sigismund’s only daughter), the bromance (he and Sigismund were tight), and most importantly — the money that Sigismund always needed but never had. So just before Sigismund shuffled off this mortal coil in December 1437, he called on his nobles to recognise Albrecht as his heir.

But what was there to inherit? When Sigismund died in 1437 he had pawned off or lost the margraviate of Brandenburg and the duchy of Luxemburg, and had already given him the margraviate of Moravia. That leaves the three crowns, Hungary, Bohemia and the Holy Roman Empire.

LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01

Sounds fancy, but here’s the catch — none of those crowns were hereditary. They were all elective.

The crown of the Holy Roman Empire is awarded by the prince electors without any legal or traditional regard for the relationship to the previous incumbent.

As for Hungary, since the extinction of the original Arpad dynasty, the magnates have decided who wears the crown of St. Stephen. Sigismund himself had only gained the crown after years of fighting and by convincing a majority of senior nobles and then his first wife that he was the man for the job.  Episode 169 if you want to go through all that pain again.

Equally in Bohemia it was the diet that had called John of Luxemburg to the throne in 1310 and after the Hussite revolt it had become abundantly clear that the only way to become and to remain king of Bohemia was with the consent of the estates.

Meang that all that happened so far was to put Albrecht onto the shortlist. When Sigismund closed his eyes forever on December 9th, 1437, it was down to Albrecht to turn his great starting position into a viable claim on the thrones.

And Albrecht wasted no time. A month later he was in Hungary and whoever amongst the magnates was there elected and crowned Elisabeth and him as queen and king of Hungary. As will become clear later, the loyalty of the magnates lay more with his wife Elisabeth than with him, but what counts for now is that he became king.

The imperial election was even easier. Albrecht did not even ask to be elected, and having seen how distracting it had been for Sigismund, his advisers strongly suggested that he rejected the honour. Albrecht shrugged and accepted in March 1438.

Bohemia was trickier. Albrecht had spent decades fighting the Hussites and was a hardcore Catholic, so plenty of Czechs weren’t thrilled to see him as king. They even had another option: Władysław III of Poland, a teenager who marched into Bohemia with an army. But when his forces faced Albrecht’s, no battle was fought — Władysław went home, and Albrecht took control.

That is what happened, but what was the logic behind it? Why did the three kingdoms accept Albrecht as their ruler?

The answer to that is the geostrategic challenge that will cast its long shadow over European politics for the next 250 years – the Ottomans.

Just take a look at the Atlas. And remember that your globe is based on a Mercator projection that makes europe look a lot bigger than it actually is. In terms of surface area it is less than  a quarter of the size of Asia. And by 1438 europe was in terms of population, economy, culture and military capability a lot less than a quarter of Asia.

Ottoman army under Murat II besieging a city

And one of the great powers of Asia, the Ottomans was coming for Europe. They had already defeated one of the largest European armies of the Late Middle Ages at Nikopol in 1397 (episode 168). The only reason they had not overrun Constantinople right away and then marched on to Budapest, Prague and Vienna was a threat to their southern border.

Timur or Tamerlane as the English called him defeated Sultan Bayezid, the victor of Nikopol at Ankara in 1402. It took the Ottomans thirty years to recover and reconsolidate, but by 1438 they were back pushing up the Balkans. And from now on they would not stop again.

Europe’s defences were weak. Hungary and its allies, namely Serbia and Wallachia were no match for the concentrated might of the Ottomans. The lands that lay right behind Hungary, Austria, Bohemia and Poland, they knew they were next in line. So, over the 250 years that followed, they had to come closer together. There is a geostrategic logic behind what would later become the Austro-Hungarian empire. It wasn’t inevitable at all that it would be led by the Habsburgs, but there was a logic for its existence as a political entity, despite all its cultural differences.

And Albrecht was one of the first who benefitted from this logic. Once he was accepted as king of Hungary, the Bohemians had not much choice. The Ottomans were coming up the Balkans under their new sultan Murat II. He had thrown the Venetians out of the Peloponnese in 1432 and he was mustering his new model army to go after Serbia and Hungary.

Albrecht’s rival for the Bohemian crown, Wladyslaw III, was a 14-year old boy with no military experience, whilst Albrecht was a battle-hardened general. And Albrecht had already gained the Hungarian crown.

So, in June 1438 the Bohemian barons elected and crowned Albrecht of Habsburg, king of Bohemia.

Epilogue

The rest of the story is short and painful. I will leave it again to Eneas Silvio Piccolomin to bring the story to its conclusion: quote:

“After his stay in Bohemia, Albrecht returned to Vienna and afterwards continued to Hungary. When he stayed in Buda, there was a popular uprising against the Germans. The Hungarians took to weapons, went on a rampage through the city, and killed the Germans they found on the spot.1 Then they went on to attack the merchants’ houses. Great anxiety seized all the Germans. The king stayed in the castle, trembling with fear and rebuking the queen for having brought him to this. The Hungarian barons did not feel safe with the people. Thus they went on for several hours, plundering and murdering many Germans.2 But Ban Ladislas,3 a great baron in Hungary and related to the queen by marriage,4 mounted his horse and rode through the city, and with many entreaties he managed to soften the people’s fury, for he was popular with them because of his respect for and merits towards them. Afterwards, the Hungarians declared that it was necessary to fight the Turks who were tearing the whole kingdom apart. Albrecht offered to do it and call on the German and other Christian princes to more easily expel the enemies. However, the Hungarians said there was sufficient strength in Hungary; only order and leadership were lacking. But if the king himself went to war, there would be both order and leadership, and there would be no need to call in foreigners when their own people sufficed. This the Hungarians did because they feared that the Germans would grow too [strong] in their kingdom. The queen sided with them, being only too happy to be shown more honour than her husband. The Hungarians honoured her because she spoke their language and was the heir to the kingdom. They accepted Albrecht as her husband, but they did not like that he was a German and, moreover, did not speak Hungarian. The woman was clever and cunning. She had a man’s mind in a woman’s body,5 and she pushed her husband wherever she wanted to. Thus, she induced her husband to accept the Hungarians’ advice.

An army was gathered, and, moving towards the battlefield, they came to a marshy and foetid area, where there was not enough wine and food. A public announcement was made forbidding all to touch arriving provisions without the queen’s permission. There was no mention of the king. Then, when the enemies approached, the Hungarians fled in all directions, leaving the king with only a few men. He barely escaped, cursing his wife roundly. So great was the disorder that the Hungarians approached the queen even when she was lying in her bed.

Very upset, Albrecht decided to return to Vienna to gather an army and avenge the Hungarians’ betrayal. While travelling, he fell ill from the extraordinary heat and ate too many melons, which caused his death. Thus, he fell as quickly as he had risen.”

King Albrecht II died on October 27th, 1439 near Esztergom in Hungary.

He had no son at the time, but his wife was pregnant. What happened next and whether the Habsburgs would now rule Bohemia and Hungary for good, well that will be revealed next week. I hope you come along.

And if you find all of this worth supporting, go to historyofthegermans.com/support, where you can find various options to keep this show on the road and advertising free.

How the habsburgs got their Chin

“The Habsburgs ruled half of Europe with a chin that entered the room five minutes before they did,” is one of those witticisms that made the 19th century so amusing. But by then the Habsburg jaw had long receded.

It had its heyday in the 16th and 17th century when people in Spain called out to the future emperor Charles V: “Your majesty, shut your mouth! The flies of this country are very insolent.” And when they looked at his later descendant, king Charles II who was probably the worst affected, they said, he was “more Habsburg than human”.

But where is the Habsburg Jaw from? The view repeated again and again in history books is that it came from Cymburga of Masovia, the wife of duke Ernst the Iron, but was she really responsible? Or was it something quite different that caused that deformation, and what has it to do with the prostration of duke Friedrich IV before emperor Sigismund in 1415?

That is what we are looking at in this episode.

Listen on Spotify

Listen on Apple Podcast

Listen on YouTube

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 207 – Of Land and Lip – How the Habsburgs got their chin, which is also episode 5 of Season 11: The Fall and Rise of the House of Habsburg.

“The Habsburgs ruled half of Europe with a chin that entered the room five minutes before they did,” is one of those witticisms that made the 19th century so amusing. But by then the Habsburg jaw had long receded.

It had its heyday in the 16th and 17th century when people in Spain called out to the future emperor Charles V: “Your majesty, shut your mouth! The flies of this country are very insolent.” And when they looked at his later descendant, king Charles II who was probably the worst affected, they said, he was “more Habsburg than human”.

But where is the Habsburg Jaw from? The view repeated again and again in history books is that it came from Cymburga of Masovia, the wife of duke Ernst the Iron, but was she really responsible? Or was it something quite different that caused that deformation, and what has it to do with the prostration of duke Friedrich IV before emperor Sigismund in 1415?

That is what we are looking at in this episode.

But before we start just the usual handing round of the begging bowl. I guess you know the drill by now, but if you are still listening, maybe you feel it is time to make a contribution to the continued existence of the show, free of advertising. And if you do, go to historyofthegermans.com/support and choose one of the various options. Just do not get confused when the software asks you for your account details, even if you get here for the first time. Do not worry, all it is trying to do is to get you to open an account by providing an email and password, so that you can access the bonus episodes and the forum.

And special thanks go to Morera, Edward B., Derrick C, Derek Edmundson, Barry J. R., Joachim B., Lonhyn J., Steve and Stephen C. who have already signed up.  

And with that, back to the show.

Last week we ended with archduke Friedrich IV, count of Tyrol kneeling before emperor Sigismund and begging to be readmitted to his grace.

The kneeling was certainly humiliating, but the other conditions of his pardon were threatening the viability of the whole Habsburg project. Friedrich had to surrender all of his lands to the crown, keeping only those that Sigismund chose to return to him as a fief. And that return of the lands Sigismund had made dependent upon Friedrich standing trial in Constance for his treason and any other claims anyone else might be bringing.

Friedrich IV before emperor Sigismund – Richetal chronik

In other words, the chance that Friedrich would be stripped of all his lands for good was pretty high. It is in this period that Friedrich IV gained his nickname, Friedel mit der leeren Tasche, Friedrich with the empty pockets.

A loss of his lands, in particular of the Tyrol, would have significantly altered the Habsburg trajectory; because of the silver mines of Schwaz. This “mother of all mines” grew to be the largest industrial complex in Europe, where 10,000 miners dug up silver ore, ore that acted as collateral for the immense loans granted by Jakob Fugger and others, which in turn funded the Burgundian wars of Maximilian and the election of Charles V as emperor. In other words, without the Tyrol, no loans, no Spanish Netherlands and hence no Habsburg empire.

The mining district Rerobichl near Kitzbühel in Tyrol (Schwazer Bergbuch, Innsbruck, Tiroler Landesmuseum, Codex Dip. 856, table ” Kitzbühel ” )

The fate of the Habsburg family hung in the balance.

The one who put his considerable weight on to the scales was Ernst, the Iron, duke of Styria, Carinthia and Carniola and brother of Friedrich IV. Upon news of Friedrich’s surrender, he popped up in Meran and began organizing the resistance, and maybe his own takeover of the county.

Friedrich now had to decide. He could stay in Constance and bet on Sigismund’s mercy, or he could flee to Tyrol bringing the wrath of the emperor, an excommunication by the council and an invading army of princes down on him.

William Coxe described Friedrich’s situation in Constance as follows, quote: “Meanwhile Friedrich was detained at Constance, where he was treated like a culprit, and watched like a prisoner. He was brought into the courts of justice, to answer all the complaints which were preferred against him ; he was repeatedly excommunicated by the bishop of Trent, for not restoring the dominions of that see, and threatened with still severer punishments by the council; he was deserted by all, avoided as a heretic and a traitor, reduced to want, and deprived of all necessities of life. Malicious reports were industriously circulated that he was engaged in plots to assassinate Sigismund, and menaces were not withheld that he was destined to become a sacrifice to public justice.” End quote.

OK, so the imperial mercy option looks distinctly unpromising. Friedrich had to go for option 2. On March 1st, 1416, he fled from Constance and returned to Tyrol via Feldkirch and the Arlberg pass.

When he arrived in Tyrol, he was warmly greeted by the estates of the county. Which must have been a great relief for Friedrich. Friend of the Podcast Enea Silvio Piccolomini in his gossipy biography reports that Friedrich was popular with the common people because; quote: “he would often change his dress and visit taverns and farmers unrecognised. There, he enquired, as if a stranger, what they thought about the country’s government and asked much about the dukes, the barons, and the prince. When he heard them praise the prince and criticise the barons, he was glad that he enjoyed the people’s favour”. End quote.

Hence his subjects preferred him to the emperor Sigismund, they preferred him to a Bavarian duke, they preferred him to his brother Ernst, the only thing they did not prefer him to, was death.

So, despite his jubilant reception in Meran, and Ernst subsequent withdrawal back to Styria, Friedrich was by no means out of the woods yet. If Sigismund could muster an army and go down to Tyrol, his vassals may not be as supportive as they appeared right now. His barons may rise up after all. Sigismund tried to encourage them to do exactly that. He even kept dangling the carrot of imperial immediacy before them, if only they would help him toppling the obstinate count of Tyrol and deliver him to Constance.

Throughout 1416, 17 and 18, Sigismund was trying to put together a force that could make an attempt at the topographically challenging Tyrol. He called on the Swiss Confederation, the German cities, the dukes of Bavaria, the Counts Palatine, even his friend and protégé, Friedrich of Hohenzollern, who he had just made margrave of Brandenburg.

But they all turned him down. The Swiss had already got what they wanted when they took the Aargau, the German cities had lost confidence in the constantly cash-strapped emperor, duke Ludwig the Bearded of Bavaria was disappointed when Sigismund first denied him satisfaction against his cousin who had tried to smash his head in, and then passed him over when it came to awarding the margraviate of Brandenburg (all that is in episode 172).

Duke Ludwig the Bearded of Bavaria-Ingolstadt being attacked by henchmen of his cousin Duke Heinrich the Rich of Bavaria-Landshut

The imperial princes finally did not see much benefit in helping Sigismund expanding his empire through the acquisition of Tyrol. And on top of that, Sigismund had dozens of other matters to attend to, the two remaining renegade popes, the fallout from Teutonic Knights’ defeat at Tannenberg, issues in Hungary, a marital crisis, money problems etc., etc. pp. Sigismund was always frazzled, but never more so than during this period.

And so, in 1418, at the behest of the newly elected pope Martin V and under pressure of the mounting tensions in Bohemia following the trial and execution of Jan Hus (Episode 174) Sigismund made peace with Friedrich IV. They met in Merseburg on lake Constance and hashed out a deal.

And as always with Sigismund, when he realised his political options were exhausted, he sold out. So for the trifling sum of 50,000 florins, Friedrich was re-enfeoffed with the Tyrol. And he was given permission to pay out any of the other princes who had taken over his other lands in 1415.

Despite the vast amounts of silver coming out of Schwaz, It took Friedrich a decade plus to get all his former possessions back. Except for one, the Aargau, the ancient homeland of his family was not for sale. The Swiss Confederation could not be bought. The Castle of the Hawk would never return into the family possessions, all they kept was the name.

Schloss Habsburg

Friedrich IV ruled for another 21 years, and whilst he could not shake his nickname as Friedrich of the empty pocket, he became again one of the richest princes in the empire. That wealth came in part from the mines, but also from the fundamental changes he implemented in his lands.

Piccolomini had noted that when Friedrich took charge of Tyrol, the county was ruled by the barons and he had quote “no power by himself. And “he grew tired of it and wanted to change things.”

Schloss Tirol in Meran – ancient seat of the counts of Tirol

Before Friedrich IV moved to Meran in 1410, there had not been a continued presence of the Habsburgs in Tyrol. As so often, the constant shortage of cash compelled the princely rulers to mortgage their rights and lands to the local aristocrats and ultimately left the management of the county entirely to them.

In his first year as count, Friedrich established a register of ducal rights in the Tyrol. He hired administrators who began collecting on these rights, whilst his accountants kept track of money coming in and money going out. Friedrich moved the centre of the princely administration from Meran to Innsbruck where he established the Neuer Hof, which became the residence for the duke and the permanent seat of the government.

Innsbruck Neuer Hof (Goldenes Dachl dates from emperor Maximilian, not Friedrich)

Innsbruck was a strategically better location, in particular because it was at the intersection of the East-West route between Austria and the ancestral lands on the upper Rhine and on the North-South Route across the Brenner Pass. And most importantly, Innsbruck is just 30 km from the silver mines of Schwaz.

Friedrich did not limit his activities to just enforcing or buying back of his existing rights, he also tried to actively expand them. And for that he used the Privililegium Maius, the forged list of ancient rights and titles his uncle Rudolph the Founder had bestowed on the family. And these rights were far reaching and in many ways unprecedented. They included, amongst other, a ban on any man within the geographic boundaries of the county to hold immediacy, aka report directly to the emperor. Further, all temporal courts, authority over the forests and game, waters and woods are subordinate to the duke. And, whatever the Duke shall ordain  or command in his lands and regions may not be changed in any manner, in any way, or at any future time, by the Emperor or any other authority. And best of all, these provisions were supposed to apply not just in Austria, but in any territory the house of Austria had already or would in the future acquire.

Privilegium Maius

Sure, this is all made up, but then Friedrich IV made it reality.

The people must upset about these policies were the Tyrolean barons. They formed noble societies intended to oppose these changes. Friedrich neutralised these societies by asking to become a member himself, a demand the aristocrats could hardly refuse.

But the most powerful of these barons, Heinrich von Rottenburg, whose inherited title of Hofmeister had made his family the de facto rulers of Tyrol, kept the feud going. He called upon duke Stephan of Lower Bavaria and the bishop of Trient/Trento to help him put Friedrich back into his box.

Heinrich von Rottenburg

This lord of Rottenburg was a tough nut and a famous duelist who had killed “many men” and according to Piccolomini “had a coffin with lighted candles carried with him” at all times as a courtesy to his victims.

Still the duke prevailed, mainly because he could rely on the support of the estates, specifically the cities and the gentry who were tired of the abuse by the constantly feuding barons. Rottenburg surrendered in 1410 and six months later he was dead. Whether he was put in his travel coffin, we will never know.

This success did much for the reputation of Friedrich which may explain why he was so enthusiastically received when he returned from his ill-fated adventure in Constance.

In 1419, the most serious of these baronial revolts kicked off. The lords of Starkenberg, of Spaur, the family of Oswald von Wolkenstein, ably supported by the bishop of Trient and the condottiere Pandolfo Malatesta, attacked Friedrich’s castles. Friedrich managed to withstand this first wave of attack. And then through a combination of diplomacy, legal action and occasional warfare, he managed to break the alliance of the barons.

The last of the barons to surrender was Oswald von Wolkenstein, the knight and poet. His life is such a riveting tale. He had started out as knight errand, travelling to Prussia, Russia, Tartary, Turkey, the near east, the Holy Land, Italy, France, the Black Sea and Aragon. He had gone to Konstanz with Friedrich IV but then changed sides and entered service with the emperor Sigismund. He was sent to England on a diplomatic mission, he was in Perpignan helping to bring the antipope Pedro da Luna to resign, he went on crusade in North Africa. Back home he feuded with his peers. One of these feuds went horribly wrong. He was captured by his opponent and extensively tortured, before ending up in one of Friedrich IV’s prisons.

Oswald von Wolkenstein

His poetry ranges from tales of his travels, much self-deprecation, a heavy dose of sex, mixed with a religious poetry and just pure joie de vivre.

And he used his gift to have a go at Friedrich. Here is one of his complaints:

“I complain of the day,
that I first gave my faith
to a lord who keeps empty hands.
Though I served him long and well,
I find no thanks, no reward,
only sorrow, hunger, and grief.
He calls himself Duke,
yet leaves his men in want —
truly he is poor in purse and poorer in heart.”

This is also the oldest reference to Friedrich IV as being penniless.

I thought about creating a whole episode on Oswald von Wolkenstein, but I think we need to press on now. Maybe we can do it as a bonus episode, if you guys want me to.

Back to Friedrich IV. Our friend Silvio Aeneas Piccolomini summarised his other feats and qualities as follows: quote: “He took a wife from the House of Braunschweig. She bore him a son whom she wanted to be named Sigismund. .Friedrich was a man of great sexual appetites and had affairs both with married women and married men but mostly with maidservants. He loved money, and therefore he never wanted to fight the Venetians since they assisted him financially.” End quote.

We will get back to Friedrich IV in a moment. First we need to talk about his elder brother, Ernst, his wife Cymburga and the reason you probably pressed play on this episode, the famous Habsburg Jaw.

The reason we talk about this now is that the eldest son of Ernst was the first of the Habsburg who is confirmed to have presented that famous feature, the Habsburg lip. Just have a look at the episode artwork. And based on a long tradition, last repeated by Andrew Wheatcroft in 1995, this son had quote “inherited his most striking characteristic, a fat and ponderous lower lip” from his mother, .

Friedrich V (III as emperor)

His mother, Cymburga of Masovia could probably take it. She was by most accounts a strong woman, as in strong enough to bend horseshoes and drive nails into walls with her bare hands. A most suitable companion for a duke who went by the name Ernst, the iron, or as others called him, the  “little robber with the giant beard”.

Archduke Ernst the Iron with his wives, cymburga on teh left (1820)

But did she really bring this world renowned trait into the family?  

Before we go there, let’s just define what exactly is the Habsburg Jaw? It is a hereditary deformation whereby the lower jaw outgrows the upper jaw, resulting in an extended chin and a crossbite. This Mandibular Prognathism is the result, not of just one genetic mutation, but multiple genes that add up together to create a particular trait. To get all these genes in the right order requires a seriously intense level of inbreeding, which is why these conditions are very rare. And in the case of the Habsburgs, there are some additional features like the pointy nose, thick lips and droopy eyes, all of similar provenance, aka requiring multiple genes acting in concert.

Forms of Prognathism

These features vary in degree and become ever more pronounced throughout the 16th and 17th century until we hit Charles II of Spain who was so deeply affected, he could neither speak nor chew normally.

So, let’s take a look at the alleged culprit, Cymburga. First up, we have no contemporary portrait of her. Polish and Austrian chroniclers who knew her, did not mention a protruding jaw.

Cymburga of Masovia (picture from the 16th cnetury)

Now let’s look at her genetic inheritance.

She was the daughter of the duke of Masovia, a cadet branch of the Piast family, the kings of Poland. Her mother was the sister of Jogaila, the grand duke of Lithuania and king of Poland who had defeated the Teutonic Knights at Tannenberg. There is little chance that her parents had much blood in common, given her mother’s family had only recently converted to Christianity and had hence not been suitable marriage material for European royalty.

Her father’s family had one ancestor with a jawline deformation, Boleslaw Wrymouth, the king of Poland who was born in 1086, aka 300 years before Cymburga. It is also not clear whether Wrymouth’s impairment had been genetic or had been caused by an injury.

Boleslaw III Wrymouth (as imagined in the 19th cnetury)

The Poles are currently undertaking a broad analysis of the DNA of their Piast kings and dukes, none of which had noticed an anomaly linked to Mandibular Prognathism, though admittedly that is not what they were looking for. These studies are published in Polish, which is why I had to rely on Chat GPT to see whether there was anything in it, a notoriously unreliable source. So, if any of you can read Polish and can have a look, it would be much appreciated.

Dukes of Masovia (~1450)

Let’s add all this together, (i) Cymberga’s parents were not closely related, (ii) there is no record of her having the feature and (iii) there is no record of anyone in her family having a Habsburg jaw, except for an ancestor who lived 300 years earlier. So simply on the basis of probability, Cymberga should not be on the top of the list. There were many more likely candidates amongst the Habsburg spouses of the 13th, 14th and 15th century, all of which came from the closely interrelated community of the imperial princes.

So, why would anyone single out Cymburga?

I spent a solid day trying to trace where the first mention of Cymburga as the origin of the Habsburg jaw came from. And this turned into a truly epic and pointless goose chase. I started with Andrew Wheatcroft who quoted a book by Friedrich Heer, which does not contain the claim that Cymburga was the source. Then I looked at William Coxe who made the same allegation. He just referenced “authorities” with no further detail.

Wikipedia then directed me to Robert Burtons, Anatomy of Melancholy of 1621.

Robert Burton, Anatomy of Melancholy, 1621

I have not read the book, but Coleridge, Wordsworth, Herman Melville, Milton, Samuel Johnson, Laurence Sterne, John Keats and Philip Pullman clearly loved what medical researchers described as “that omniumgatherum of anecdotes of insanity whose burden was that mankind — including the author himself — was quite out of its mind”.

Not very reliable, but even stranger, at no point does Robert Burton even mention Cymburga. That did not stop Chat GPT and its ilk to hallucinate a detailed quote from Burton, which again, could not be found at the reference they give, nor anywhere else.

Chat GPT making stuff up….

Then Wikipedia directed me to the history of Vienna by Wolfgang Lazius from the middle of the 16th century. Again nothing at all. A run through the digitalised content of the Bavarian state library then brought up stories about Cymburga, just not ones about the Habsburg lip.

Instead the story goes that duke Ernst had met Cymburga at some event at the court of emperor Sigismund. And he was so struck by her extraordinary beauty, he travelled to Krakov in disguise to woo her. In one retelling he saved her from an attack by a brown bear, which is depicted in a 19th century picture, today in the Belvedere. So unless Ernst had a strange penchant for chinful women, Cymburga was unlikely to be afflicted by a deformation of the jaw.

Franz Dobiaschofsky, 1850 – Duke Ernst the Iron saves Cymburgis of Masovia 

There is however a conceivable reason in this story that may explain why Cymburga was blamed.

Cymburga and Ernst were both members the high aristocracy, unmarried and a link between Habsburg and Poland was politically opportune. So why the cloak and dagger story and the bear thing.

The problem was that Cymberga’s existence reminded the family of another humiliation. Ernst’s older brother Wilhelm had been engaged to Hedwig, the daughter of king Louis of Hungary and Poland. Hedwig is better known to posterity as Jadwiga, the girl that was made king of Poland in 1384. Wilhelm and Jadwiga were apparently quite close and she had lived in Austria as a child. But in the complex negotiations following her father’s death, the Polish estates decided that the engagement to Wilhelm should be set aside and that Jadwiga should marry Jogaila, the grand duke of Lithuania instead. Jogaila, who was Cymburga’s uncle, leveraged this marriage into the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth that dominated much of central Europe. We covered this tumultuous process in episode 169.

Dymitr of Goraj by Jan Matejko depicts Jadwiga trying to break the castle gate to join William

Whilst the marriage to Jogaila made sense for the Poles, it was a massive snub to the Habsburgs. Breaking engagements was something a king or emperor could do to a burgrave of Nurnberg or a margrave of Baden, but not to an archduke of Austria. Well the Poles had done it and the Habsburgs had to face the fact that they had dropped back into second tier.

Cymburga’s presence in Vienna was a constant reminder that Habsburg power was much diminished, making her extremely unpopular with the family. So, if you look for a reason why she was singled out as the source of the Habsburg Jaw, that may be it. But then again nobody seems to have mentioned it until William Coxe in 1847, and god knows where he got it from.

So, if it definitely was not Cymburga, where did Habsburg Jaw come from then?

Well, there is one figure close to the house of Habsburg that had a confirmed deformation of the jaw, and that was the emperor Sigismund himself. In all his portraits you can see he could not fully close his mouth any more, something people remarked on at the time.

Emperor Sigismund

But there is no link between Sigismund and the surviving branches of the House of Habsburg, neither downstream from him, nor two or three generations before.

Then, maybe it was running in the family already for some time.

We have two depictions of early members of the house of Habsburg that are believed to be genuine portraits. And these are the tomb of King Rudolf I from about 1295, and an oil portrait of Rudolf IV, the founder from the mid-14th century.

Rudolf I

I am not sure I can detect anything on Rudolf I, whilst Rudolf IV does look as if he was a mouth breather. But I am not sure what that is worth.

Rudolf IV

Maybe the explanation is much simpler. The European high aristocracy had settled sometime in the 13th century. Very few new families were able to enter the close circle of intermarried princes. Sure, there were the Italians, the Visconti of Milan, the Medici of Florence and then the Lithuanians and Russians, but most of the rest was basically the same set of cousins twice removed that made up the rather limited gene pool.

What tightened the pool further and may have given rise to their most prominent feature was the constant intermarriage between the Spanish and the Austrian branches during the 16th and 17th century. And why did they constantly intermarry? Did they not know about the impact of inbreeding. Oh sure they knew about this. This is an agricultural society where everyone understands what happens if a herd is left without fresh blood. Leaving aside the strict rules of the church about consanguinity.

But these marriages between often first cousins were a political necessity. Charles V had divided the Habsburg empire into two parts, the Austrian and the Spanish line. To keep the two parts of the empire acting in unison, the Habsburgs needed to renew the familial link at least every second generation, leading to a truly catastrophic level of inbreeding.

Only when Spain was lost to the Bourbons, the need for these intermarriages disappeared and with it the Habsburg Jaw. Maria Theresia had no visible Prognathism, nor had her children, in particular not Marie Antoinette, though French revolutionary propaganda kept adding the feature to her depictions.

Maria Theresia

In other words, the Habsburg jaw was the result of politics, of a fear that the coherence of the family could fall apart. And that fear of a breakup of the family goes back to the times we talk about right now.

Which is what gets us back to Ernst the Iron.

Ernst the Iron was last seen taking over the Tyrol whilst his brother was literally tied up in Konstanz. And when Friedrich re-appeared in 1415, Ernst returned to Styria without making a fuss.

Ernst the Iron

That is quite a remarkable change of pattern. In the years before he had fought his brother Leopold over control of the duchy of Austria proper and had later on conspired with the barons of Tyrol to oust his younger brother. But now, at a time when Friedrich was on more than shaky ground, he did not pounce.

We do not know what had happened to him. He had done a pilgrimage to Jerusalem in 1414 where he was knighted as a member of the order of Holy Sepulchre. As such he had to commit to  a number of religious observances, maybe even the 10 commandments which have this clause about not coveting your neighbour’s house, fields, man and maidservant, or even ass or anything else..

Though I wonder whether the shock of seeing his brother and hence his family kneeling before Sigismund had triggered his change of heart. Had the family been united, Sigismund would have never gotten away with humiliating a senior member of the Habsburgs. Friedrich and Ernst were both powerful princes, and their cousin Albrecht V was equally rich and a very close ally of Sigismund. The fact that neither protested against Friedrich’s ban and its execution, is what made this possible. And when a year later, at least Friedrich and Ernst stood together, Sigismund stood no longer any chance of invading Tyrol.

This entente between the brothers seemed to have continued once the Tyrol was stabilised. And when Ernst died in 1424, his two sons, Friedrich and Albrecht were placed under the guardianship of Friedrich IV. And in turn, when Friedrich IV died, his former ward took over the guardianship of his son 12-year old Sigismund.

So, after all, the kneeling before Sigismund, painful as it certainly was, had a silver lining in as much as it shocked the Habsburgs out of their internecine warfare into finding a way to act more coherently. We are still a long way from the point where they are sacrificing their health and appearance for the sake of family coherence, and this was not yet the last war between brothers, but the understanding had set in, that they can either rule together or be dragged under divided.

One member of the family has taken very much of a back seat in this episode, and that is Ernst and Friedrich’s second cousin, duke Albrecht V of Austria. Now he is the one who will truly restore the fortunes of the family, bringing them back to the top table, ironically courtesy of the man who had just humiliated them. And that is that we will discuss next week, I hope you will join us again. And if you find all of this worth supporting, go to historyofthegermans.com/support, where you can find various options to kee

Albrecht III&IV, Wilhelm, Leopold IV, Ernst the Iron and Friedrich IV

Success for a princely family in the Late Middle Ages has a lot to do with reproductive luck. Not having any offspring, in particular no male offspring is a bit of a knockout. But having too many sons that could be a major issue too.

And in 1386 the Habsburgs struggled with exactly that problem. Their territory was already divided between an Albertine and a Leopoldine line. But then Leopold had four sons, bringing the number of archdukes of Austria to six, which is five too many.

In this episode we will discuss how they managed to muck it up quite bad, in fact so bad, one of their number had to fall to his knees before the emperor, not once, not twice, but three times…

Listen on Spotify

Listen on Apple Podcast

Listen on YouTube

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 206 – Division, Destruction and Degradation, also episode 4 of the Fall and Rise of the House of Habsburg.

Success for a princely family in the Late Middle Ages has a lot to do with reproductive luck. Not having any offspring, in particular no male offspring is a bit of a knockout. But having too many sons that could be a major issue too.

And in 1386 the Habsburgs struggled with exactly that problem. Their territory was already divided between an Albertine and a Leopoldine line. But then Leopold had four sons, bringing the number of archdukes of Austria to six, which is five too many.

In this episode we will discuss how they managed to muck it up quite bad, in fact so bad, one of their number had to fall to his knees before the emperor, not once, not twice, but three times…

But before we start let me tell you a little bit about my research process. For almost a year now I do most of my research at the London Library. The London Library was founded in 1841 by Thomas Carlyle and counted great luminaries from Charles Darwin to Helena Bonham Carter amongst its members. What makes this place so special is not just its amazing history and the chance to bump into authors one has been admiring for decades, but the way it is organised. The London Library has a collection of books only rivalled by the British Library. But other than the British Library, the books are stacked by topics. So you can go to a section entitled History/Austria, or printing, or even one of history- Sigismund emperor. And that allows me to find books I would have never spotted in a library catalogue. For instance to prepare this episode I did borrow the books on the Habsburgs by Martyn Rady, Andrew Wheatcroft and Jean Berenger, but whilst picking them up, I came across William Coxe’s History of the House of Austria from 1847, that may not cover the latest research but is written so vividly, I borrowed a few phrases from him. Same goes for Hugo Hantsch’s Geschichte Österreichs and an anthology about Oswald von Wolkenstein.   So, if you are based in London and feel like joining a library that has over a million titles at hand and is organised for the needs of writers and creators, not librarians, check it out.

I am afraid membership is not cheap, but that is where some of your generous contributions go. So as I sink into the comfortable leather sofa in the reading room to indulge in William Coxe’s prose, my thanks go to Sven N, Torsten, Raymond F., Patrick M., Pim W., Gerald A. G. who made this happen by signing up at historyofthegermans.com/support.

And with that, back to the show.

Last week we watched duke Lepold III of Austria sinking into the mud outside Sempach under the incessant blows of the Swiss halberds. There are dozens of battles that mark the end of the dominance of the armoured knight on horseback. And Sempach was one of them. Not the first, but a seminal one.

Leopold had been a seasoned military commander. He had defeated duke Stephan of Lower Bavaria when he was just 17. And since then he had spent his time in the saddle, riding from one conflict to the next. Holiday for him was a trip to Koenigsberg in Prussia to have a go at the Lithuanians. (check episode 133 if you want to hear what these trips were like). For a city militia and the forces of three rural cantons to defeat someone like that in an open battle where Leopold was able to deploy his army of knights and trained infantry as he wished, that was again proof that military tactics had to change.

Infantry was now more important, whilst cavalry, including heavy cavalry, remained an key military tool. So, coordination between these different forces  became the key to success, superseding the individual bravery that had been the most prized military skill up until then.

This transition should have translated into social and political change as well. If co-ordination was the key to success, then a system of clear hierarchies where orders are being followed was required.

Armies with effective chains of command require training, equipment and would ideally fight together as units for an extended period of time. And that costs money, hitherto unimaginable amounts of money. To raise funds on that scale, territories needed to be larger and have a proper administration, in particular tax collection systems. We have seen some princes working hard at establishing all of these things, like the Valois dukes of Burgundy, and be rewarded for it with an ever expanding power base.

But old habits die hard. And one of the old habits that had been engrained in chivalric society, was the idea that even princes would divide their property equally amongst their sons. Forward thinkers, like Rudolf IV and Karl IV had attempted to introduce primogeniture even for princely, as opposed to royal, territories. But in the end, both of them had failed.

By the end of the 14th century, Karl IV’s sons Wenzeslaus and Sigismund were at each other’s throats, ably assisted by their cousins of Moravia and the Bohemian barons. And Rudolf’s brothers, Albrecht III and Leopold III had de facto divided the Habsburg possessions.

And when Leopold III was laid to rest at Koengsfelden, the process of fragmentation of the family territory went up a gear.

Leopold had left four sons – four. The legendary Habsburg fecundity was back on show.

But as we all know, one can have too much of a good thing, and princely sons in an already divided territory can be very much too much of a good thing.

Have you been counting? Let me do that for you. By 1386, we have six Austrian archdukes. There is Albrecht III, called with the Plait, the founder of the so-called Albertine line and his only son, Albrecht IV. Albrecht III was in his prime at 37 years of age. Then we have his nephews, the sons of Leopold III. The eldest, Wilhelm was 16 when his father died, followed by 15 year-old Leopold IV, and the younger two, Ernst 9 and then Friedrich IV, only 6.



Previous generations of Habsburgs had signed family compacts and agreements to deal with exactly  such a situation. The problem was that there were so many of these compacts, and with such different provisions, that  any member of the family could claim more or less anything under one or other of these agreements. The only broad planks enshrined in all of them was that #1 – as a family – they should stick together, #2 that the two eldest male members of the family should direct overall policy and #3 that in case one line dies out, their lands were to go to the remaining members of the family.

Comparisons are always difficult, but the Habsburg at least on paper started with a bit more coherence than the Wittelsbachs, whose decline we have traced in episodes 196 and 197. But let’s see what that was worth in real life.

The two eldest at this point were Albrecht III, the head of the Albertine line and Wilhelm. Wilhelm was Albrecht’s junior by 20 years, so one would expect Albrecht to enjoy at least a few years of largely uncontested rule. A period he could use to consolidate power by pushing through the provisions of the Privilegium Maius.

But that would be a misunderstanding. Albrecht III was a feeble man. Whenever things got a bit dicey, he took refuge in a monastery to seek advice from his saviour. The other one of his obsessions was with the hair a woman. We do no longer know who this woman was, but she clearly meant a lot to him, since he had her tresses braided into his hair, which is why he was known as Albrecht with the Plait. On the positive side, he had a strong interest in science and theology, which came in handy for the university of Vienna that thrived thanks to Albrecht’s support.

To concentrate on these pursuits, he handed over the management of the duchies to his most trusted courtier, John I of Liechtenstein. Liechtenstein did a reasonable job at maintaining peace and keeping the robber barons down, which is why the rule of Albrecht III is often described as a benign one, in particular compared to what was to come.

In 1395 Liechtenstein was found with his hand in the till once too often and was toppled as de facto prime minister. Devoid of his counsel, the peace-loving Albrecht III found himself drawn into the conflict between his neighbour, King Wenceslaus and his barons. Wenceslaus was at this point still king of the Romans, though his authority in the Reich was almost non-existant. And his control of Bohemia was also slipping, so that he found himself captured and then incarcerated by his barons. The barons transferred Wenceslaus to Austria, to the castle of Wilsberg. Wenceslaus supporters then invaded Austria to free their king, which they managed. But that forced Albrecht III to get involved. Albrecht took the side of the barons against Wenceslaus and mustered an army. But before he could set off, he succumbed to an unknown illness, leaving behind only one son, Albrecht IV, aged 16.

With Albrecht III gone, the seniority system flipped. It was now Wilhelm, the eldest of the Leopoldine dukes who took the lead in family politics.

Under the previous regime, Albrecht III’s conciliatory nature and the age gap to Wilhelm meant that things could trundle along nicely. That was no longer the case.

Albrecht IV and Wilhelm were only 9 years apart in age. They were cousins, not uncle and nephew and they held different perspectives on the big political questions of the day.

The Habsburgs had hitched their cart to the Luxemburg bandwagon with Rudolph the Founder’s marriage to Katherina, the daughter of emperor Karl IV. On that occasion, the two families had made a pact that should either of them die out, the other was to inherit all their lands. When Rudolph the Founder had died without offspring, Albrecht III had then married another of Karl IV’s daughters and they renewed the alliance including the clause on inheritance. So it was Luxemburg all the way for the House of Habsburg.

It only became problematic when there was division within the house of Luxemburg. By 1402 the disagreements between the half-brothers Wenceslaus and Sigismund of Luxemburg had reached boiling point. Sigismund had captured Wenzeslaus and had sent him over to his friends and allies, the Habsburg dukes of Austria.

That was a sign of great trust, but also caused some major headaches for our two dukes.

Sure, the dukes had been close to Sigismund, but at least legally, Wenzeslaus was the head of his house and heir to Bohemia and the Luxemburg lands in the empire, territories of huge strategic importance to the Habsburgs. Therefore having king Wenzelaus in custody was a very, very hot potato, or, since potatoes had not yet made it across the Atlantic, a very hot parsnip. Nobody knew how the conflict between the brothers would end and so drawing Wenzeslaus’s wrath was not a good idea.

What exactly then happened, nobody knows. But one night, Wenzeslaus hopped the fence and legged it back to Prague.  Did Albrecht IV let him go, or was it his cousin Wilhelm who had unlocked the cell?  

Albrecht IV at least felt obliged to placate Sigismund by doing something he rarely did, he went to war. In 1404, the two princes were leading an expedition against a rebellious group of barons in Moravia, when they both fell violently ill. Sigismund recovered, Albrecht IV did not. As always there were rumours of poison everywhere…and again, who knows. But as far as Sigismund was concerned, he had more confidence in Albrecht’s loyalty than in Wilhelms. And he transferred this sympathy to Albrecht’s son, Albrecht V, who was just 7 years old at this point.

The question of who amongst the Luxemburg brothers to support was not the only thing Albrecht and Wilhelm had been at odds. Over the previous decades the two lines of the family had tried to find arrangements that balanced the demands of each member of the family to be a real prince with a territory to run and to keep the Habsburg united and hence in the Premier League of princes. Over time the egoistical urges outpaced the willingness to stick together.

When Albrecht IV died, the Habsburg lands were de facto split into three. The core duchy of Austria was held by the Albrechts, Styria, Carinthia and Carniola were now administered by Wilhelm and the Tyrol and the ancestral lands on the upper Rhine were managed by the second eldest brother, Leopold IV.

Given little Albrecht V was only 7 years old, Wilhelm assumed the guardianship, which would have put him in control of almost the whole lot. This concentration of power was unacceptable to the other three brothers. Which is why Wilhelm had to accept his brother Ernst as co-ruler of his territory and Leopold had to accept the youngest, Friedrich as his partner.

And that is when things started to go seriously south. The brothers not only did not get on, they also began to pursue different policies. Whilst Albrecht and Wilhelm had been firm supporters of the House of Luxemburg, Leopold sided with Ruprecht of the Palatinate, the archenemy of the Luxemburgs. Ruprecht had been elected king of the Romans after Wenzeslaus of Luxemburg had been deposed for incompetence (episode 165 if you want to know more). Leopold not only gave Ruprecht free passage through the Tyrol, he joined the king’s attempt to journey to Rome, which stalled in Milan. The political unity of the House of Habsburg was broken.

Things got even worse when Wilhelm died in 1406. It was now Leopold IV’s time as senior Habsburg. But whilst in previous arrangements the two joint rulers accepted the seniority of the elder, this was not the case any more. The two younger brothers demanded not just a share of Wilhelm’s lands, but also the guardianship over their cousin twice removed, little Albrecht V. The compromise they arrived at was that the youngest, Friedrich, would be the sole duke in Tyrol and the ancestral lands, whilst Leopold and Ernst would jointly administer Styria, Carinthia and Carniola and act as joint guardians over little Albrecht V. That arrangement was then further altered so that Leopold would administer Austria for Albrecht and Ernst would get Styria. And even that was not clear enough, because Leopold and Ernst began to quarrel over what land was Styria and what was Austria.

The four brothers were a rough lot, ready to raise a sword at the slightest provocation, seeking war and adventure wherever there was an opportunity. They were after all the sons of Leopold III, the martial hero and martyr of the battle of Sempach. But even within that lot, Ernst stood out. He would become known as Ernst “the Iron”. He was brutal and ruthless.

When the disagreement between him and Leopold over Austria and Styria turned violent, he did not hesitate to call on Hungarians and Bavarians to devastate his brother’s lands as well as the lands of his ward, young Albrecht V. Leopold in turn brought in one of the most feared Bohemian mercenary commander to do the same. The chronicler Thomas Ebendorfer bemoaned this upheaval as the worst in living memory, a timequote ”where the sons were forced to rob their fathers”. Ernst became known as the “tiny robber with the giant beard”. Things came to a temporary halt when their neighbour, the then not yet emperor Sigismund intervened. In 1409 he decreed that the brothers should cease hostilities and share the revenues of their lands and that of little Albrecht equally. And he set out that the guardianship should end on Albrecht’s 14th birthday, aka by 1411.

By that point the Habsburg rule was in a very sorry state. The land has been devastated by the foreign armies the two brothers had called into Austria. But there had also been structural changes.

Some of the lords who had been vassals of the dukes of Austria were wiggling out of their subordination. Amongst them were the counts of Cilli, the family of Sigismund’s wife Barbara, whose life we looked at in episode 184.

Even more significantly, the ducal estates were taking more and more control of the finances and political direction. Each of the main territories, Austria, Styria, Carinthia, Carniola and the Tyrol had a body representing the subjects, the estates. These consisted usually of three and sometimes four orders, the clergy, the nobles and the cities. In some places the nobles were divided into two, the rich barons and the gentry. The latter was a feature quite common in central Europe where the feudal system as we know it in the west, had only been imported quite late and had been overlaid over existing structures.

What would also often happen was that the voting pattern worked along economic lines rather than by estate. So the barons, abbots and bishops would act together whilst gentry, cities and lower clergy would be another unified block.

The estates could not assemble at will, but had to be called by the duke. That tended to happen when the duke was running out of cash and he wanted to raise taxes. Tax raising authority was not formally given to the estates, but from a purely practical point of view it was more effective when the taxed subjects had agreed to pay. As time went by, and demands for cash mounted, the estates were called more and more often until in many places the diet met once every year. And during times when a duchy was ruled by a minor, the estates often assembled to protect the rights of their lord against his guardians.

Alongside the regular assemblies, the estates also established their own administration. This dealt predominantly with taxation matters, apportioning the obligations amongst the different orders. Building from there they took an ever larger role in the administration of the state, for instance managing the courts. They built their own palaces, the Landhaus, often splendid buildings in the centre of town. In Vienna it is placed next to the Hofburg and in Graz the Landhaus is a spectacular affair with one of central Europe’s most impressive Renaissance courtyards and attached to it is the Landeszeughaus, the armoury of the duchy that contains 32,000 pieces of arms and armour.

These representative bodies would become an important restraint on the power of the Habsburg emperors. They existed all through to 1848 not just in Austria but also in Hungary and for a crucial time, in Bohemia.

In 1411, the two quarrelling brothers, Leopold and Ernst, will get more than a glimpse of the power of these ducal assemblies.

Albrecht V, the sole heir to the Albertine line had finally reached his 14th year and as per Sigismund’s  ruling was to be declared an adult and given control of the duchy of Austria. Though Ernst and Leopold were constantly at each other’s throat, they agreed on one thing and one thing only, that Albrecht should remain a minor for as long as humanly possible. Because as long as that was the case, they, Ernst and Leopold would receive the revenues from the duchy, not the no longer little Albrecht V. So they blocked and tackled, and blocked, and tackled.

The estates of Austria got increasingly irate about this selfish behaviour. And even more importantly, they wanted to prevent another war between the brothers that would  decimate their home. So they applied an unusual method. Several members of the diet went to see Albrecht at the castle where he was living. They convinced him to leave and rode to Eggenburg where the diet declared him an adult and swore him allegiance. When Leopold and Ernst heard about the – as they called it , kidnapping, they got into such a rage, that Leopold, known as the Fat, had his long overdue coronary. And when the second oldest brother hit the floor with a massive thud, Albrecht V became the duke of Austria for real.

Albrecht V

We will talk a whole lot more about Albrecht V in next week’s episode.

The time we have left today will be dedicated to the ingenious way in which the youngest of the brothers, Friedrich IV managed to sink the house of Habsburg even further.

Friedrich was in charge of the Tyrol and the ancestral lands on the upper Rhine. Following the battle of Sempach, the Habsburgs had lost significant territory in German speaking Switzerland, but Albrecht IV, Leopold IV and now Friedrich IV had managed to stabilise the situation, and even regaining some of the lost ground. Albrecht IV, or more accurately, his wife Mechthild of the Palatinate, even had time to found the University of Freiburg, my Alma mater.

And the legendary silver mines in Schwaz in Tyrol had begun operations. So for all intents and purposes, Friedrich IV should have been able to live the joyful life of a noble prince, hunting and shooting all day.

But not so our friend Friedrich. Friedrich had developed an appetite for high politics, in particular Italian politics. The Tyrol included what is now South Tyrol, or Alto Adige, meaning their southern neighbours were the duke of Milan and the Republic of Venice. And that is where he started to get into conflict with Sigismund. Their disagreements were mainly political rather than personal. In 1409 Sigismund had again confirmed the Erbverbrüderung, the commitment that either family would inherit the other’s territories should they die out. And that could at least theoretically include Friedrich IV.

That being said, the political differences between Friedrich and Sigismund kept mounting, in particular when  Friedrich linked up with Venice, one of Sigismund’s arch enemies. In 1413 Sigismund explored options for the Swiss Confederation to attack Friedrich, which they did refuse.

In 1414 the  emperor Sigismund called the great church Council of Constance to bring an end to the schism that had resulted in three competing popes. Episodes 171 to 174 if you want to get the full picture.

Of the three competing popes, only one, Pope John XXIII, was travelling across the Alps to be present at the largest gathering of the church in the Middle Ages. He travelled via the Tyrol where Friedrich IV was more than excited to meet the pope, who wouldn’t be. The two men got on extremely well and Pope John made Friedrich the commander of the papal army with a stipend of 6,000 ducats. This papal army was however BYO, bring your own. Friedrich gathered 500 lances and accompanied the pope to Constance, promising him safety and security.

Once Sigismund arrived in Constance and saw the papal bodyguard, he leant on Friedrich to disband his troops. After all, a pope with a small army was a lot harder to depose than one without.

Which is what was about to happen. Pope John XXIII had hoped that the council would make him the one and only pope, and depose his two rivals. But he was finding out quite quickly that the mood went a very different way. The council was planning to depose all the popes, including him.

In his predicament the pontiff decided to flee. If he left Constance, so he thought, the council would no longer be legitimate, and he could remain pope. And to organise his escape he relied on the commander of his armies, Friedrich IV of the Tyrol.

Friedrich organised a tournament – it seems every time something bad happens to the Habsburgs, it has something to do with tournaments –  anyway. Friedrich organised a tournament and everybody came. Well except for pope John XXIII, who pointed to the papal ban on tournaments that had been formally in place for centuries by now and had now been ignored for centuries.

So whilst everybody was watching grown man knocking each other unconscious for sport, John snuck out of the city and sought refuge in one of Friedrich’s castles. Friedrich too skipped town once the tournament was over and before anyone had noticed the missing pope. That happened on March 20th, 1415. On March 22nd, Sigismund accused Friedrich of treason against church and empire. Another week later, without observing the usual 45 day grace period, Friedrich was put in the imperial ban and declared an outlaw. The council excommunicated him as well.

Now anyone could kill Friedrich or occupy his lands without sanction. And to make this a reality, Sigismund declared all of Friedrich’s lands vacant fiefs and promised to grant them to anyone who could seize them.

Friedrich was completely stunned by this reaction. He had gone to Freiburg im Breisgau, waiting for the collapse of the council and the rewards from his papal benefactor/hostage.  

Instead he receives news that Zurich and Berne were sending troops into the Aargau, that the Count Palatine had taken his lands in Alsace, that Vorarlberg had fallen to his enemies and  that Sigismund’s agitators were working on the estates of Tyrol to throw him out. Against such an onslaught his spread out forces stood no chance. The mighty fortress of Baden in Switzerland fell, and then the Habsburg itself was occupied by the city of Berne.

Let me at this point hand over to William Coxe who described the scene in his inimitable 19th century fashion as follows:

Friedrich quote “sunk under his multiplied disasters, and, refusing to listen to the exhortations of the pope and of his adherents, or to the voice of honour, yielded to the pusillanimous advice of Louie duke of Bavaria, and consented to deliver up the pope, and submit himself to the mercy of Sigismond.

No prince of the empire ever submitted to such indignities, or experienced such degradations, as Frederic. To grace and witness his triumph, Sigismond summoned the most considerable princes of the empire, and the ambassadors from the Italian states, with the chief fathers of the council, into the refectory of the Franciscan convent at Constance. The emperor, having seated himself on his throne, Frederic, accompanied by his nephew the burgrave of Nuremberg, and by his brother-in-law Louis of Bavaria, entered the apartment, and thrice prostrated himself. The eyes of the whole assembly were fixed on the unfortunate prince, and a dead silence prevailed, till Sigismond demanded, “What is your desire ?”

The burgrave replied, “ Most mighty king, this is duke Frederic of Austris, my uncle ; at his desire I implore your royal pardon, and that of the council, for his offences against you and the church , he surrenders himself and all his possessions to your mercy and pleasure, and offers to bring back the pope to Constance, on condition that his person and property shall remain inviolate.” The emperor, raising his voice, asked, “ Duke Frederic, do you engage to fulfil these promises ?” and the duke, in faltering accents, answered, “I do, and humbly implore your royal mercy.” At this reply a sensation of pity spread through the whole assembly; even Sigismond himself seemed to be affected, and said, “I am concerned that he has been guilty of such misdemeanours.” Frederic took the oath, by which he surrendered to Sigismond all his territories, from the Tyrol to the Breisgau, submitting to hold as a favour what the emperor should please to restore, and yielded himself as an hostage for the fulfilment of the conditions. Sigismond then took him by the hand, and concluded the ceremony by observing to the Italian prelates, “ You well know, reverend fathers, the power and consequence of the dukes of Austria ; learn, by this example, what a king of the Germans can accomplish.” End quote

As Coxe said, such elaborate humiliations were rare, in particular of a prince whose family had already furnished 2 plus one king of the Romans and not long ago had been on par with the House of Luxemburg. It was meant to demonstrate the power that Sigismund had garnered through his management of the Council of Constance, and may well be the high water mark of his political power.

At the end of this process, Friedrich had become effectively landless. All territory that wasn’t occupied by his enemies was now Sigismund’s direct possession. Alsace was gone, several towns were raised to cities and given immediacy, the Swiss cantons were confirmed in their possession of the lands south of the rhine, including the Habsburg and Baden. His subjects had sworn allegiance to the Luxemburger, except for one – the Tyrolians. The estates of Tyrol did not want to become part of a Luxemburg empire, or worse, be enfeoffed to a Bavarian duke. Instead they called on Friedrich’s brother, duke Ernst the Iron, to come and lead the resistance.

It was at this point that this once richest imperial prince, owner of the largest silver mine in Europe, became known as Friedrich with the Empty Pocket.

Given the family history I am unsure whose ambitions Friedrich feared more, Sigismund and his allies, or his brother’s…but he needed to act to protect his lands. So he fled from Constance, breaking his solemn oath. He was put back into the imperial ban. Sigismund called on his princes to muster an army to execute his ban.

I think this is where we are going to leave it for now. Friedrich IV, Count of Tyrol, prince of the house of Habsburg, kneeling before Sigismund of Luxemburg. The ancestral castle of the Hawk occupied by townsfolk from Berne and lost for ever.

Surprising as this sounds, this is still not the low point for the family. Friedrich will find his boulder to climb back up on to fight another day. Ernst the Iron will do unironic things and Albrecht V, well, he is set for greater things. And all that so they can tumble down again.

Something to look forward to next week. I hope you will join us again.

And if you find all of this worth supporting, go to historyofthegermans.com/support, where you can find various options to keep this show on the road and advertising free.