Pope and emperor Henry VI clash over Sicily

This week we will watch Henry VI’s attempts to make the papacy comfortable with the fact that their neighbour to the south is now the same as their neighbour to the North. Pope Celestin may see it as encirclement by a family whose track record as sons of mother church had been to say it politely, a bit patchy. But Henry VI thinks there is a way to make this work. Let’s see…

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans, Episode 72 – Clouds on the Horizon

This week we will watch Henry VI’s attempts to make the papacy comfortable with the fact that their neighbour to the south is now the same as their neighbour to the North. Pope Celestin may see it as encirclement by a family whose track record as sons of mother church had been to say it politely, a bit patchy. But Henry VI thinks there is a way to make this work. Let’s see…

Before we start just a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. And thanks a lot to Francisco, Peter and Per who have already signed up.

Last time we left emperor Henry VI. enjoying a string of successes that made the year 1194 by far his best. Not only did he take possession of the Kingdom of Sicily, his by right of inheritance through his wife. What put the icing on the cake in 1194 was the birth of his son and heir in the city of Jesi on Christmas day.

He was only 32 but his wife had just turned 40 and hope of continuing his line must have been thin on the ground. Henry VI. Had probably resigned himself to the idea of not having a legitimate heir. For him to die without a direct heir was not particularly worrisome for the dynasty since Henry’s father, Barbarossa had 8 sons, of which 4, including Henry were still alive by 1194.  

But now even that possible wrinkle in his imperial career was resolved. Henry VI. was at the top of the world.

But the wheel of fortune that had catapulted him up keeps turning. Barely a month after his solemn coronation in Palermo, a monk appears in the imperial chamber and tells of a conspiracy. The Sicilian nobles were planning to murder their new ruler. Behind it he says are Tancred’s widow who just recently had been so magnanimously allowed to retain the ancestral lands of her former husband. Other key conspirators were the bishop of Salerno who had so vehemently insisted on putting Constance in chains and the admirals Margarito and Eugenius who had frustrated Henry’s siege of Naples in 1192.

Initially Henry VI. did not believe the story, but when he was shown documents that implicated the main conspirators, he had to strike. He invited them to court, confronted them with the proof he had gathered and had them all arrested. Within days the whole conspiracy collapsed and it’s leaders were in jail. Their crime was high treason and the sanction for that was death. Again, still magnanimous, Henry Vi. did not have them killed or blinded. They were exiled and kept under guard in Germany. The ex-queen Sybil and her daughters were confined to the monastery of St. Odile in Alsace where they were held until Pope Innocence III effected their release in 1198. The former boy king William III was brought to Hohenems, one of the largest Hohenstaufen castles near lake Constance. He would never see daylight again. The admirals and the bishop ended up on the Trifels, in the suite of rooms so recently vacated by Richard the Lionheart..

For many of his contemporaries this felt a little bit too convenient though. The conspiracy allows Henry to remove the potential leaders of the opposition to his rule, just when he is planning to go home. There is also the question why the conspiracy happened so soon after Henry had taken power. A few months earlier the conspirators were in charge of the kingdom, and they did surrender without much resistance. If they had thought imperial rule had to be opposed at all cost they could have struck after Henry had released his army in October when he had only taken Messina so far. Some questions are hanging in the air, and remember, this is a man some accused of having killed the elected bishop of Liege and who had a returning crusader apprehended and released only after a huge ransom was paid.

The conspiracy, disconcerting as it was, was also the background to one of the great love stories of the age.

Amongst those taken prisoner was Irene, the daughter of the Byzantine emperor Isaac Angelos. She had been sent to Palermo to marry the son of Tancred as part of an alliance to keep Henry VI. out of the Mediterranean. But this son, a man called Roger, had died before the marriage could actually take place. Irene had stayed in Palermo after Roger’s death, probably because the political situation in Constantinople was fragile. Her father would be deposed and blinded by his brother in 1195. As a member of the family of Tancred she was implicated in the conspiracy and her fate was to be buried alive in some monastery in Germany. But she did not.

Henry VI. youngest brother, Phillip had fallen deeply in love with the Greek beauty. The 18-year old prince had fallen head over heels for the beautiful and ill-fated princess from the East. Young Phillip was begging, beseeching, entreating and imploring his brother to release this wonderful creature, the love of his life. Henry VI. still magnanimous let her go. He even allowed Phillip to marry her even though she had zero political value now that her father was blinded and imprisoned. Henry VI. She travelled back to Germany with the Imperial party, not as a prisoner, but as the bride of Phillip, the emperor’s brother.

Phillip had initially been designated for the church and had even been elected as bishop of Wurzburg but in 1193 he had left the church and returned to being a laymen. That was probably in the wake of the death of his older brother Frederick who had died in the Holy Land and the realisation that his other brothers were falling short of their great father. Otto, the second youngest had inherited his mother’s county of Burgundy. There he managed to create absolute chaos. He began feuding with most of his neighbours. One he killed with his own bare hands, another was assassinated under implicating circumstances. He had the brother of the bishop of Strasburg executed and basically fought all the time with everybody, until he was mercifully himself murdered in 1200.

The next oldest surviving brother, Conrad had been made duke of Swabia upon his older brother’s death in 1191. Conrad was also fond of the occasional quarrel with his neighbours, but his true passion was sex, both with willing and with unwilling participants. His end came about thanks to such a case of rape. One theory is that he was killed by an enraged husband, but my preferred version is that the victim bit off his right nipple. The wound became infected, and this awful duke of Swabia succumbed in 1196. Phillip became his brother’s successor as Duke of Swabia and de facto the number 2 in the House of Hohenstaufen after his brother, the emperor Henry VI.

Ok so much for the family history. Trust me that will become relevant pretty soon, but before we get there, we should go back to Henry VI. and the fundamental problem he needs to address.

He might have found some compliant bishop who was prepared to crown him king of Sicily, but that is not the same as having the papal blessing for his ascension. Thing is that by 1194 the Kingdom of Sicily has become a fief of the papacy and only of the papacy. Yes, there used to be imperial overlordship over Southern Italy and emperor Lothar and Pope Innocent II had a bit of ding dong about who was to take the oath of vassalage of Apulian nobles. But 50 years later this imperial right had gone from theoretical to non-existent. The kings of Sicily beginning with Roger II had signed multiple agreements with the papacy that confirmed the pope’s feudal superiority. Usually, these agreements came about when the pope had – again – lost a battle against the Normans and was put in a cell. From there he was made to graciously accept the Norman upstarts as his vassals whilst signing an agreement  that limited his effective control of the kingdom to close to nothing. The last such agreement dated from 1156 and restricted papal over lordship to a mere formality. The pope did not even have any influence on the selection of bishops in the kingdom of Sicily.

Henry VI had taken Sicily not on the back of some long forgotten imperial rights, but as the inheritance of his wife whose rights have the same source as that of her ancestors, the investiture of the kingdom by the papacy.

Hence in order to be fully established as king of Sicily, Henry VI. needed the pope to formally invest him as King of Sicily. Without that the pope could at any point invest another third cousin twice removed of King Roger II as King of Sicily and Henry VI. would have another war to deal with.

But it is more than just this formality. The pope is now sandwiched between two territories the emperor controls. In the south the Kingdom of Sicily and in the North, the Kingdom of the Lombards as well as the Lands of Matilda that at this point are under imperial administration. This, Henry realises is an uncomfortable position for his holiness. It is important both for his reign, but also for his dynasty that a sustainable settlement is found.

Negotiations did not start slow. They did not start – full stop. Henry VI. and Pope Celestin III had not communicated at all for three years. Relations had been strained ever since the freshly crowned emperor rode out of Rome telling the Holy father that he did not care one bit about his opposition to him becoming king of Sicily.

To mend fences, Henry thought he could give the pope the one thing he should cherish more than him not being king of Sicily. And that would be the return of Jerusalem into Christian hands. So, Henry sends a letter to Celestin offering to take the cross. He asks to be sent a papal legate to discuss the details and formulate a plan. At the end of March the papal response arrives at the imperial court in Bari. It is delivered by a simple bishop who says – nothing. Celestin does not see why the promise of a crusade would any reason to speak to the emperor again.

Henry now changes the angle of attack. He sends a formal offer to the cardinals of the curia, promising to leave with 1,500 well-equipped and well-funded knights and the same number of infantry for the Holy Land. And he simultaneously calls all his vassals to join him on crusade.

Now the pope cannot ignore Henry any longer. He may have his differences with the emperor but at this point the church is not yet prepared to outright dismiss a sincere offer of crusade for purely political reasons. That they will do later. Celestin III has to  and does send some cardinals to help plan the upcoming crusade. Two high ranking Cardinals who have a good reputation at the imperial court arrive and the crusade is under way. They even bring a letter from pope Celestin where he addresses Henry as Emperor of the Romans and says nice things about working together and the like. But when Henry probes the cardinals to find out about Celestin’s willingness to accept him as King of Sicily, he gets the response he should have expected: what do these two things have to do with each other? We love the crusade idea, but that will not make you the legitimate King of Sicily.

And with that communication between pope and emperor goes silent again.

This failure to strengthen the legitimacy of his reign in Sicily forced Henry to go all in on the crusade plan. If he were to return to Europe as the prince who had returned Jerusalem to Christendom, the logic goes, there won’t be anything the pope could refuse him anymore. Equally, if he fails, the game is up, papal allies will revolt in Sicily and even the civil war in Germany may resume.

With failure not an option, he needed to massively increase the military commitment. When the crusade finally leaves in 1197 the knights and foot soldiers count up to 18,000, 6 times what he had promised the cardinals in 1195.

And he needs to go it alone. No other monarch should be allowed to share in the glory if he wants to return as the saviour of Outre Mer. And that is where the recent vow of allegiance of Richard the Lionheart comes in handy. Richard might have been interested to go back to the Middle East and relive his glory days. He went so far as to negotiate a peace with his foe, king Philippe Auguste to allow him to join the crusade. But Henry, as his now overlord, rejected the agreement so that the two kings had to keep fighting in France.

Henry now needs the support of the imperial princes, nobles and Ministeriales. To gain that he needs money, glamour and he will have to make major concessions.

As for items 1 and 2, his newly acquired kingdom provides plenty. He travels to Germany accompanied by 150 mules carrying selected treasures from the glittering court of Palermo. Amongst them is the coronation mantle of King Roger II. As the name indicates this mantle was used in the coronation ceremonies of the Kings of Sicily and until 1806 in the coronation of the Holy Roman Emperor. It was made of silk and is covered in 100,000 pearls and pieces of enamel. On each side it shows a lion striking a camel. It also bears an inscription in Arabic that was only translated in the 18th century. It states that this coronation mantle was made in the royal workshops of Palermo in the year 528 of the Islamic calendar. It is today in Vienna, together with the other imperial regalia.

On his way home Henry VI. stopped in Folignano the seat of the Konrad, duke of Spoleto. This is where his son, little Frederick had been living for the last year. His mother, Constance had returned to Sicily shortly after giving birth to take over the regency of the kingdom whilst her husband was travelling back to Germany. It seems that in light of the recent conspiracy against the life of Henry, Sicily was still considered too dangerous for the precious heir to the throne. Little Frederick was left in the care of duke Konrad and his wife, who were German nobles, administering the duchy on behalf of the empire. Though Frederick was less than a year old, Henry puts him at the centre of his political schemes.

To gain the support of the imperial princes he offers a package deal.

The princes are to receive two important concessions they have been demanding for a while now.

Number 1 was to make fiefs fully inheritable. That means the duke or count has the right to pass on his fiefs not only to their eldest son, but to their daughters, nephews and even remote cadet branches. In other words, a fief never returns to the king but stays within the family.  This is a privilege some princes enjoyed, others did not. For instance, the duke of Austria enjoyed them under the Privilegium Minus granted by Barbarossa in 1156. And as we have seen in the aftermath of the fall of Henry the Lion, the emperor is already struggling to call back  fiefs that have become vacant.

Number 2 was to end the right of the Spolia. The Spolia allowed the emperor to confiscate the personal belongings of a bishop or abbot upon his death. And further it allowed the emperor to draw the income of the bishopric during the period a bishopric was vacant. That had been both a significant source of imperial income and a thorn in the side of the bishoprics.

In exchange for these concessions, the princes were to grant the following:

  • Election of the baby Frederick as Frederick II
  • Participation in the crusade

And – drumroll

Making the empire a hereditary monarchy.

Yes, that was his deal. No more elections. In the same way the princes can now pass on their fiefs to essentially whoever they want, the emperor should also be able to pass his crown to whoever he chooses. Fair dues, right. It is just an alignment of imperial practice to what has been the case in most other European monarchies, in England, in France, in Aragon and in Sicily.

Henry pushed his package hard. He first proposed it at a royal assembly in Mainz in early March 1196. As only few princes had shown up for that, a new assembly was set for Wuerzburg 2 weeks later. There he managed to coerce the princes into accepting the new concept of monarchy. They squirmed and wiggled, they moaned and groaned, but in the end, they took the deal. They cared more about their right to pass on their fiefs as they liked than the right to elect an emperor.

The princes signed a document that set out the new constitution of the empire, they swore an oath to elect the 2-year-old Frederick and many took the cross. It was agreed that the crusaders should come down to Sicily in the spring of 1197 and would take ship from there to the Holy Land. This again shows how significant the control of Sicily is for the empire. Previous German crusades had taken the land route via Hungary, the Byzantine empire and Turkish controlled Anatolia. And all previous efforts had perished along this route. Sicily with its splendid navy finally opened up the sea route for the skint German knights who could not afford the extortionate fares the Venetians, Pisans and Genoese were charging.

So far the wheel of fortune is still pushing our emperor Henry VI up. He has his Kingdom of Sicily, he has made the empire an inherited monarchy and his crusade is well under way and looks a lot more promising than his father’s. But just you wait.

And when things go well for the empire, the popes tend get very agitated. In fact, pope Celestine III is more than agitated. Henry VI. last move confirmed his worst suspicions. This emperor was out to get him and the papacy. Not only had he encircled Rome militarily, he also removed one of the papacy’s most significant political levers, the imperial coronation.

As we have seen time and again, the popes had used their right to crown the emperor to extract concessions. They made Lothar III wage war against the Normans, they made Barbarossa wrest Rome from the Senate and so on and so on. If the empire becomes an inheritable monarchy, the coronation will become nothing but a formality, similar to the coronation of the kings of England or France. The archbishops of Reims and Canterbury could not demand any concessions from their rulers for performing the coronation, and Celestine feared, quite rightly, that this would be the same for the popes once Henry VI. got his way. The papacy was facing its worst crisis since Henry Iii had deposed three popes in one go in 1046.

He needed to do something to derail Henry’s plans. But what?:

He did stop the marriage of the only daughter and heir of the King of Aragon to one of Henry’s brothers. This would have been an even further expansion of Hohenstaufen power that he could prevent. But it didn’t do much to improve the current situation.

There was however something else. His legates had noticed that many of the princes were uncomfortable with the deal they had just made. They became worried that an inheritable imperial crown could over time challenge their position. They could see how the Capetians across the Rhine were rolling up their once overbearing magnates. The landgrave of Thuringen and some other Saxon nobles publicly refuted the agreement they literally had just signed. They threatened to slow down or even abandon their commitment to go on crusade, thinking that pope Celestine would release them from their crusader oath.

Henry VI. was by now down in Italy as part of the preparations for the crusade. That made it difficult for him to confront the princes directly. He called them to an assembly at Erfurt where his representatives pointed to documents and letters where they had committed to the crusade and the recognition of an inherited monarchy. But to no avail. The princes simply refused to fulfil their obligations.

It is now October 1196 and with all the preparations for the crusade in full swing, ships being prepared, depots set up, mercenaries being hired, there was no time left for Henry VI. to go back to Germany, sort out the rebels and still set sail in spring 1197. And the worst case scenario could materialise, that the pope and the rebels join forces, excommunicate and depose him, establish an antiking and cause decades of civil war.

The only way to solve this was by going to Rome and bringing this conflict with the papacy to a solution, one way or another.

Henry travels south and sends his envoys ahead with a first offer to the pope. He offered the papacy financial independence and a settlement over the lands of Matilda. Oh yes, the lands of Matilda are still in dispute, 85 years after the death of the great countess. He offers the pope some of the most lucrative church benefices in the realm to be paid to him directly in exchange for a formal recognition of the imperial ownership of the lands of Matilda. That is at least financially a great deal since the Lands of Matilda have been under imperial administration for most of the last fifty years and yield close to nothing to the papacy.

Money talks and Celestine III agrees to talk. Henry, who had already travelled south en route to see his son at Folignano, turns west and moves towards Rome. In Montefiascone, 100km north of Rome did Henry VI. receive the cardinals Celestine III had sent to negotiate.

There he revealed an even larger and more comprehensive proposal, a proposal that would address more of existing conflicts between the papacy and the empire not just the Lands of Matilda.

We do not know what exactly Henry VI. proposed, but it was likely that on top of an enhanced financial compensation scheme for the Lands of Matilda, he would accept the pope as his liege lord for Sicily and would let the pope baptise little Frederick and consecrate him as king of Sicily.

That offer was rejected but not in such a way as to end negotiations.

Henry moves now closer to Rome to facilitate negotiations. He modified his offer sacrificing positions that so far no emperor had offered.

Again, Celestine III and his cardinals reject the offer.

In December Henry VI. makes his last and final offer. We do not know exactly what it was,  but Hartmut Jericke believes that Henry VI. offered to become a papal vassal not just for Sicily but for the empire too. That would be an absolute bombshell. The last time a papal envoy suggested the emperor was a papal vassal, he was almost run through with a sword by Otto von Wittelsbach. But here his son is offering the unimaginable, all that to stabilise his rule in Sicily.

Pope Celestine should be ecstatic. Imperial vassalage was the great objective of Gregory VII and Alexander III but neither of these greats popes achieved it. And now here it is offered on a silver platter. But he rejects this last and final offer. He rejected it because Sicily was more important, more important than anything Henry can offer, including himself and his empire.

Are they both mad or is Souther Italy really that important? Hard to believe from today’s perspective, but Short answer, yes it was.

 The rise of the papacy from plaything of Roman aristocrats and emperors to its formidable position under Gregory VII and Alexander III went hand in hand with the rise of the Normans in Sicily. The Normans were the counterweight the papacy needed to resist the emperor and they used the emperor as a counterweight against the Normans. Without the military counterweight in the south, the papacy was doomed to fall back into dependency on the emperors. Sicily was rich, rich enough to fund mercenary armies for years, something no emperor had been able to do before. And Sicily had a fleet, something no emperor commanded before.

And that is why Hohenstaufen control of the kingdom of Sicily was unacceptable. There is literally nothing Henry VI. can offer to make them accept it. Not money, not Jerusalem, not vassalage of the emperor, nothing whatsoever could cut a deal.

This is not the end of the Middle Ages, but a key pillar of it is falling in these December days outside Rome. The pope and emperor, the two swords of Christendom are no longer joined in the pursuit of a common objective. Military and political considerations take precedence over the spread of Christianity. Less than 10 years later crusaders will plunder Constantinople, the capital of a Cristian empire, others will be chasing heretics in southern France in the service of Phillippe Auguste’s aim to consolidate royal power in France.

The encirclement of Rome and the Ppatrimonium Petri pits Papacy and empire into a fight to the death for the next 60 years, at the end of which the Hohenstaufen will be gone and the popes will be locked in the golden cage that is the Palais de Papes in Avignon, courtesy of the heirs of king Philippe Auguste.

This epic struggle will feature two of the greatest popes and emperors in our story, Innocent III and Frederick II. It is going to be great and I hope you will join us. I should also revert to the normal Thursday morning schedule with the next episode and audio should also return to normal.

Before I go, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patron.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to do advertising. I was absolutely shocked to hear the host of another show I admire and which is much more successful than this one pretending he supports some energy supplement.. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. As always, all the links are in the show notes.   

What to do with Richard the Lionheart and his ransom?

I am writing this whist sitting in the Loggia of Santa Maria dell Grazie in Arezzo, one of the finest early renaissance buildings ever. And I am all alone. Behind me is one of Andrea della Robbia’s masterpieces and the church also holds a fresco by a pupil of Piero della Francesca. The fact that even one of the smaller towns in Tuscany can hold absolute wonders entirely off the beaten tourist track tells you all you need to know about the delta in wealth between Italy and most of Northern Europe in the Middle Ages.

One who was painfully aware of that delta in potential tax income was our friend Emperor Henry VI. If he could only get hold of the kingdom of Sicily, the inheritance of hi wife, he would be so rich and powerful. But having lost his army before Naples and even worse, having his wife falling into enemy hands means this all looks terribly leak.

But his luck is about to turn thanks to one of the most famous and most unexpected events of the High Middle Ages, involving one of Englands most overrated monarchs. I am sure you have heard the story a thousand times of Richard the Lionheart being kidnapped ad ransomed by crowned highwaymen. Today you get the Kurusava treatment and will hear the story from the other German perspective.

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 71 – To catch a King

I am writing this whist sitting in the Loggia of Santa Maria dell Grazie in Arezzo, one of the finest early renaissance buildings ever. And I am all alone. Behind me is one of Andrea della Robbia’s masterpieces and the church also holds a fresco by a pupil of Piero della Francesca. The fact that even one of the smaller towns in Tuscany can hold absolute wonders entirely off the beaten tourist track tells you all you need to know about the delta in wealth between Italy and most of Northern Europe in the Middle Ages.

One who was painfully aware of that delta in potential tax income was our friend Emperor Henry VI. If he could only get hold of the kingdom of Sicily, the inheritance of hi wife, he would be so rich and powerful. But having lost his army before Naples and even worse, having his wife falling into enemy hands means this all looks terribly leak.

But his luck is about to turn thanks to one of the most famous and most unexpected events of the High Middle Ages, involving one of Englands most overrated monarchs. I am sure you have heard the story a thousand times of Richard the Lionheart being kidnapped ad ransomed by crowned highwaymen. Today you get the Kurusava treatment and will hear the story from the other German perspective.

Before we start just a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. And thanks a lot to Felix, Marty and Ella who have already signed up.

History has not been kind to our emperor Henry VI. He occupies the slot between the heroic Barbarossa and the enigmatic Frederick II. It is never quite clear what he was for. But I always saw him like the slice of bread between the two pieces of meat in a Big Mac. It isn’t strictly speaking necessary but without it, it would not be a Big Mac. Chroniclers were less kind to him. They portrayed him as the ruthless, calculating power player. Three events had shaped this reputation, one of which happened to be one of the most famous events in Medieval history.

Let’s start with the first two.

The first was how he dealt with the desertion of young Henry, the son of Henry the Lion. You may remember from last episode that young Henry, the son of Henry the Lion had deserted the imperial army before Naples. He first fled to the defenders and then returned to Germany, spreading the rumour the emperor had died. Young Henry may even have harboured ambitions to get himself elected king.

This unprecedented act by a member of the second most august family in the realm called for retaliation. The desertion compounded the initial betrayal by the house of Welf who had sworn an oath to stay in exile until 1193 but returned almost immediately after Barbarossa had left on crusade.

As to be expected Henry VI. had both father and son put into the ban and called an imperial war against the House of Welf. The Saxon nobles did not need much encouragement to muster an army against the lords of Brunswick. Henry the Lion has spent the last 40 years expanding his personal property at their expense and though they managed to depose him as duke, he had remained the most powerful and most vengeful of aristocrats in Saxony.

Henry the Lion is now 62 years old and has no appetite for a full-on confrontation with the empire. He offers the one thing he knows Henry VI wants more than stability of the empire, he offers to join another campaign down to Southern Italy and his time he would come along personally so no shenanigans will happen.

Well shenanigans still need to happen, but this time not against the emperor, but again, against the Saxon nobles. For the second time in his very short reign, Henry VI will leave the Saxon nobles hang out to dry. They are not aware of the under the table agreement between the two Henries and expect their imperial overlord to join them with all his might and bring down Henry the Lion for good. Henry VI keeps up appearances, declares young Henry an outlaw and all that. But when it came to sending troops, ah, no that did not happen. The Saxon Nobles left alone by their emperor get a bloody nose before Brunswick. That was the first x on his score sheet.

His duplicitous policy in Saxony is followed by his involvement in the botched election of the bishop of Liege. Liege, in today’s Belgium was an important bishopric, crucial to retain some control over Lothringia and as a line of defence for the empire’s western border. There were two contenders to succeed the recently deceased bishop, one from a pro-Hohenstaufen party and another from an anti-imperial faction.

As per the Concordat of Worms in disputed episcopal elections, the emperor has the last word. And he chooses a third individual, Lothar von Hochstaden, a Hohenstaufen ally who had just lost out on the archbishopric of Cologne. The Anti-imperial party appeals to the pope in Rome, and Celestine III, by now firmly opposed to Henry VI. appoints their candidate, Albert, brother of the duke of Brabant. Things go back and forth a bit until on 24th of November 1192 the papal appointed candidate is struck down by two German knights whilst travelling near Reims in France.

A murdered bishop is never a good thing. What makes things more problematic is that the two knights who had murdered Albert were close associates of Henry VI. and they find refuge at his court. The duke Henry of Brabant blames not just Lothar von Hochstaden but the emperor himself for the murder of his brother. This local issue is now gradually turning into a full-blown rebellion calling for Henry VI to lay down his crown. Let us not forget that the murder of Thomas a’Beckett, just 20 years earlier, was still fresh in people’s mind. The whiff of episcopal murder is the next scratch on Henry’s scoreboard.

And that brings us to the third and by far biggest stain on Henry VI.s reputation. In January 1193 Henry VI. receives news that duke Leopold of Austria had arrested King Richard the Lionheart of England on his return from the Holy Land.

The short version of that story goes as follows. Richard the Lionheart had insulted duke Leopold of Austria during the Third crusade. Hence, when he travelled through Austrian land on his return from the Holy land, Leopold had him arrested in revenge. Henry VI. bought Richard the Lionheart from Leopold and demanded ransom from England. The amount of the ransom was ratcheted up as Henry played Richard against his enemies, King Phillippe Auguste and John Lackland. After more than a year he was released from prison after swearing allegiance to Henry.

In the public imagination Richard the Lionheart is painted as the heroic knight returning home after securing the survival of Outre-Mer. On the other side you have the archvillain, John Lackland who conspired to bring his brother down even joining up with the Angevin’s archenemy, the wily King Phillippe Auguste. Henry VI. is seen as greedy and calculating, using his position to squeeze out every penny from the unfortunate English peasants. Only duke Leopold gets away ok. He had been insulted and was hence justified in what he did. The other three had no justification, other than insatiable appetite for money and power.

Let’s take a look at this in more detail.

First up, the famous insult before Akkon.

The Third Crusade was a pan-European effort led initially by two kings and an emperor. Phillippe Auguste of France, Richard the Lionheart of England and Barbarossa. By the time the French and the English arrived in Palestine, Barbarossa was long dead. What remained of the German contingent was initially led by duke Frederick of Swabia, Henry VI. younger brother. After Frederick had died of disease in early 1192, command of the Germans went to Leopold, duke of Austria, the most senior imperial prince present.

The Third Crusade was somewhat successful in as much as it regained several of the cities on the coast, but failed to regain Jerusalem, the main objective of the exercise. When the crusaders took Akkon, the most important stronghold along the coast, the question of distribution of the spoils arose. The two kings, Phillippe Auguste and Richard raised their banners s a sign where the plunder should be collected. Leopold raised his banner alongside, not in his role as duke, but as representative of the emperor. What he did not know was that Richard and Phillippe Auguste had already decided to keep him and the other Germans out of the distribution. So, Richard had Leopold’s banner taken down by common soldiers. That infuriated Leopold in two ways, one, he didn’t get any plunder, nor did his knights and soldiers which will be difficult to explain and his banner had been insulted. But Henry VI. as emperor had also been insulted as the rights of the empire and the standard of his representative had been disregarded.

The insult was certainly one justification for Henry’s behaviour, but the much more significant one was that he had already declared Richard the Lionheart an enemy of the realm for the following reasons:

  • Richard had encouraged Henry the Lion to break his oath and return early, creating a civil war in Saxony
  • Richard was an ally on Tancred, the usurper king of Sicily who denied Constance and Henry’s legal rights to Southern Italy
  • Richard had extracted vast sums of money from Tancred, which was money that by rights belonged to the kingdom of Sicily and hence to Constance

As far as Henry VI. can make out, Richard the Lionheart was out to undermine his rights and standing in Europe and was an enemy. Whether Richard pursued an active anti-imperial policy is however doubtful. It is quite clear that he did not take his agreement with Tancred seriously since he departed Sicily with all his troops once the gold was on board and rumblings of the imperial army arriving before Naples could be heard. And I doubt he had any notion of the havoc an early return of Henry the Lion would cause in Germany. It is typical Lionheart. He is a bit of an elephant in a porcelain shop, crashing into things and then looking befuddled at the debris.

And then we come to the question whether apprehending, imprisoning and ransoming Richard was an unprecedented crime that no one else was daring to commit.

For that, let’s find out why in December 1192 Richard finds himself disguised as a merchant in Vienna, literally 1000 miles from home.

Richard had returned from the Holy land and initially planned to return the same way he had come, via Sicily, Marseille and then through Provence and the county of Toulouse into his duchy of Aquitaine.

That route was blocked because he had got into a quarrel with the count of Toulouse and he was planning to apprehend him should he come near his lands. There was also a Genoese fleet based on Sardinia tasked with finding and capturing him. The Genoese may be in the pay of the King of France or have their own reason to seek out Richard. And if he had made it through to Marseille, a journey up the Rhine would have delivered him right into the hands of Phillippe Auguste. So, he had to go down the Adriatic towards Venice. It was now late autumn, and the seasonal storms broke his ship somewhere in Dalmatia.

From there he could have gone to Venice and from there across the alps on one of the western passes. But that would have meant going across Swabia or Bavaria, held by close allies and family of Henry VI., the man who had put a search warrant out for him.

Richard, the accomplished diplomat (Encyclopedia Brittannica) had irritated so many rulers in Europe that he had only one route to get home, sneak under disguise through Slovenia and Austria into Bohemia and from there into the lands of his brother-in-law, Henry the Lion and take a ship home.

Richard, more accomplished than the rest of his family (Encyclopedia Brittannica) was shockingly unconvincing as a travelling merchant. When he passed through the county of Gorizia he had the count sent a hugely valuable ruby as a present to ensure safe passage. This royal gift was unlikely to have come from the humble merchant Hugh he was travelling as. The count who also did not like Richard for god knows what reason had men searching for him and in a skirmish Richard lost 8 of his knights.

From Gorizia he ran for three days covering 150 miles before he collapsed with exhaustion in an inn near Vienna. There he was again quickly discovered because he was throwing money around as no merchant would ever do. Duke Leopold of Austria had him apprehended and brought to the castle of Durnstein.  Leopold informed Henry VI. that he had the king of England in custody.

I do not know about you, but it seems this hero of the Troubadours (Encyclopedia Brittannica) was lucky to make it as far as Vienna with pretty much all of Europe out to get him, including his own brother.

Henry promised Leopold 50,000 Mark of Silver for his hostage and Richard was brought to the Trifels, the great imperial castle in the Palatinate and then negotiations began.

Henry as we know has one political objective at this point, the crown of Sicily. Hence his demands on Richard were: a.) money and b.) military support. 100,000 mark of silver plus 50 ships, 200 knights and 100 archers led by Richard himself.

Richard like most members of his class did not care one bit about the money. What he refused to do was serve in Henry VI. army. That would have turned him into an imperial vassal which he could not and would not accept.

For the next year the two sides would negotiate almost exclusively about this issue of service in Henry VI. army. Henry had a tremendous negotiation position. Between him and the very significant military power of the Angevin house lay the Kingdom of France, so he did not have to fear any efforts to free the king by force. Moreover, Richard’s brother, John Lackland did not want his brother to return. Richard was childless so if he ended up dead in a German prison cell, John would not have minded one bit. Even worse for Richard, John and Phillippe Auguste were conspiring about ways how to prolong Richard’s stay on the Rhine. These two conspirators offered Henry VI. to pay a large amount of money for prolonging his stay in Germany.

Richard’s only trump card were his cousins, the sons of Henry the Lion. They were weighing in on the Lionheart’s behalf, offering on the one hand to take over the military obligations on Richard’s behalf, whilst on the other threatening to block any legal proceedings against Richard in the Court of Princes.

In May the two sides finally agreed a compromise. Richard would pay an additional 50,000 Mark of silver, so 150,000 in total but would be relieved from having to serve. Instead, he would convince the Welf to join the campaign.

Money then began to flow from England and a date for the release of Richard was put in the diary for January 17, 1194. But shortly before that date envoys from Phillippe Auguste and John Lackland arrived, offering Henry the exact same sum as Richard had, 150,000 mark of silver for the prisoner. If Henry had handed Richard over to the king of France, the Lionheart would never got out of jail. And that was quite tempting. Given the choice between Richard out in the wild able to retaliate for his involuntary sojourn or Richard languishing in a French prison, never able to get back at him, its pretty easy.

Henry immediately cancelled the assembly scheduled for the initial release date to ponder this extremely generous offer. He then scheduled a new assembly for February 2. There everyone expected the release of the Lionheart and his mother, Eleanor of Aquitaine was even considering coming down for the event.

And as Richard came in to the assembly, Henry threw in his hand grenade. He called on the envoys of Phillippe Auguste and John to read out loud what ha been offered. He then turned to his princes and asked them what he should do. These guys saw the dollar signs and would probably have voted to ship the hero of the Third Crusade from the Trifels to the Chateau de Vincennes.

Richard then did what he had wanted to avoid at all cost. He knelt down and agreed to become an imperial vassal. He handed the Kingdom of England over to Henry who then returned it to him as an imperial fief.

As a vassal of Henry VI. Richard could demand protection from his enemies, which meant he could no longer be handed over to the French. Richard came back to England and had himself crowned again in an attempt to wash off the oath of fealty. He spent the rest of his life fighting against Phillippe Auguste and died aged just 41 from an arrow.

Henry’s behaviour in this affair, specifically that last move to force Richard to become his vassal has been the cornerstone of his poor reputation. He is shown as the grimy ransom dealer versus the heroic chivalric knight. But all that has happened is that the world had moved on from a world where emperors like Henry II or Otto the Great pursued mainly Christian ideals to one driven by dynastic interests. And Henry’s dynastic interest was to a.) gain the Sicilian inheritance and b.) keep his empire safe, which meant keep the House of Welf in check. Richard delivered him that and screw chivalry, the crusades and all that. He is no different to Phillippe Auguste who will brand a war against the Count of Toulouse as the Albignesian crusade against heretics. Nor is he the only one to be shadowed by the whiff of murder, Richard had the murder of Conrad of Montferrat, elected king of Jerusalem, hanging over him as well.

Next question. What did they do with the money? Leopold took his 50,000 and invested it into new walls for Vienna, a ducal mint and other useful infrastructure. Henry VI. used it to gain the Kingdom of Sicily.

Flush with cash he mustered a large army. Since he could not demand a second Italian campaign from his vassals, this army consisted almost exclusively of his own Ministeriales and very expensive mercenaries.

All throughout the negotiations over Richard’s ransom Henry VI. had meticulously planned his campaign. Things had also improved in other ways. Constance had been released after a year of imprisonment thanks to papal intervention and probably in the hope to reduce the urge of the emperor to come down to Sicily.

And on February 20th, 1194 Tancred had died. Though Tancred had been formally recognised and invested by Pope Celestin III, Henry thought that with his death papal policy would now change. His army was getting ready and surely Celestin III would not want to stand in the way of such overwhelming force. Celestin, he thinks will do the sensible thing and recognise Constance’s right to inherit. But no. Celestin III invested Tancred’s little son as King William III of Sicily.

And so, Henry’s army sets off in April 1194. They hold a great muster on the fields of Roncaglia in June. The imperial lord high steward Markward of Annweiler, an important Ministeriale takes command of a combined Pisan and Genoese fleet. No longer will Henry risk that the squabbles between the two republics impede his success.

The land army advanced in three columns down into Southern Italy. The Normans put up virtually no defence. The city of Salerno where Constance had been apprehended and imprisoned saw its worst nightmares come true. Henry VI. left the city to his men to plunder for three days. Afterwards he as all its houses put to the flames.

As the army marches down the length of Apulia and Calabria, the imperial fleet under Markward of Annweiler takes Messina. In October 1194 Henry VI. first set foot on the island of Sicily. With that the military part of the campaign is over. Henry VI. immediately dismisses his expensive mercenary troops.

Tancred’s widow, Sybil and her little son, the little king William III are holed up in the royal palace above Palermo. As the Germans approach the city, the children of Tancred are brought to a strong defensive castle in the interior, whilst their mother prepares to throw herself at the feet of the conquering emperor.

Henry VI. elated by his easy success is in a magnanimous mood. He promises Sybil and her children freedom and safety. They are even allowed to retain the county of Lecce, one of Tancred’s possessions from before he had taken the throne.

On December 25th, 1194, Henry VI. is solemnly crowned King of Sicily in the Cathedral of Palermo. The royal insignia are brought to him by the little boy king William III who kneels before him, swears allegiance and in return receives the county of Lecce as his fief.

Within almost exactly 3 years Henry VI. has recovered from his nadir as a defeated war leader who had lost his wife to his enemies to lord of an additional two kingdoms, Sicily and England. Ok, England may be a bit of an exaggeration, but Richard Lionheart had knelt before him which is quite cool for an emperor that most people have long forgotten.

But even more astounding than the rise from this set of serious setbacks is the other miracle that took place two days after his coronation. His wife, Constance, by now nearly 40 years old had not made it to the coronation in Palermo. She had to stay behind central Italy because after 8 years of marriage she had become pregnant. A pregnancy at that age in the 12th century was extremely unusual but not impossible. The unnaturally fecund Agnes of Waiblingen may have had her last child at the age of 52, but then she really was really unnaturally productive.

One of the most unusual medieval stories surround the delivery of Constance’s child on Boxing Day 1194 in the town Jesi. The story goes that Constance gave birth in a tent on the main square in the presence of the reputable matrons of the city. The tent’s doors were then opened, and she breastfed her little son for all to see, as further proof that the child was indeed hers.

As much as I would love this to be true, and there is even an inscription on the town square of Jesi claiming to be the spot where the tent has stood, there are good reasons to believe the story might have been an invention.

It begins circulating only after another set of stories are making the rounds. Constance so we are told by Albert of Stade was already 60 years old at the time of her marriage. Thanks to some medical quackery Constance had made her bely swell up so as to convince the emperor of her miraculous pregnancy. Then, when it was time, the doctors lanced her stomach, let out the puss and passed a butcher’s son off as the heir to the throne. These stories were repeated in various forms. Proof was found when the king of Jerusalem called him a butcher or in fictional stories that Markward of Annweiler had told the pope he wasn’t the emperor’s real son.

The tent story was created to discredit the rumours.

Who was that child whose birth agitated so many scribes from St. Albans to Albano? That child is Frederick, the future emperor Frederick II, history dreamboat for both Germans and Italians, an enigma who for some was an autocratic proto-Hitler and for others a scientist on the imperial throne. The stupor mundi as Matthew Paris called him.

At the end of December 1194, this little boy is the crowning glory of a truly great years for emperor Henry VI. and a dawning nightmare for pope Celestin IIII and all his successors until the day they will have ripped out the Hohenstaufen, root and stem.

Next time we will see how our emperor of ill repute will attempt to make peace with Pope Celestin, offering him the one thing the papacy wants even more than freedom from encircling imperial armies, Jerusalem.

Before I go, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patron.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to start with me endorsing mattresses or meal kits. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. As always, all the links are in the show notes.   

Emperor Henry VI takes over

When Barbarossa drowns in the river Saleph in 1190 the crown transfers to his eldest surviving son, Henry, known to History as Henry VI.

This is the first time since the accession to personal rule of Emperor Henry III in 1039 that the imperial crown moves from father to grown up son without a glitch. In the previous 150 years, the passing of an emperor had been a dramatic event where all the cards were dealt anew. Just remember, Henry IV came to the throne as a child, Henry V by rebellion against his father, Lother III wasn’t in any meaningful way related to the imperial family, Konrad III came in by a coup against the named heir, as did Barbarossa. The French meanwhile had five transitions from father to son, with only one 6-year regency.   This consistency in reproduction is one of the key reasons the Capetion dynasty was so much more successful than their German counterparts, though the greatest of the Capetions has only just appeared, Phillipp II Augustus (1180 to 1223). More, and a lot more about him later.

Talking about famous protagonists, the other contemporary of Henry VI is of course Richard the Lionheart (1189 to 1199). Of him we will hear even more.

But today’s episode is mainly about the lay of the land and the first attempt to achieve the main aim of his reign, control of the kingdom of Sicily.

Transcript

Hello and Welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 70 – From Father to Son

I know, I know, you were expecting another Germany in 1200 episode, talking about feudalism and chivalric culture. And that was really the episode I wanted to produce. But as it happened, Clio, the muse of history refused to kiss me, an event much reminiscent of my teenage years.

I probably read too many books and articles on feudalism which left me utterly confused with nothing interesting to say. I would never dare to say that this debate, on which so many eminent historians have voiced an opinion is nothing but a wild goose chase. I have someone to do that for me. If you want to hear a straightforward perspective on what feudalism was, check out lecture 5 of the High Middle Ages course on the Great Courses Plus. Philip Daileader does a much better job of it than I could do.

Which means we can resume our narrative again! Hurrah!

When Barbarossa drowns in the river Saleph in 1190 the crown transfers to his eldest surviving son, Henry, known to History as Henry VI.

This is the first time since the accession to personal rule of Emperor Henry III in 1039 that the imperial crown moves from father to grown up son without a glitch. In the previous 150 years, the passing of an emperor had been a dramatic event where all the cards were dealt anew. Just remember, Henry IV came to the throne as a child, Henry V by rebellion against his father, Lother III wasn’t in any meaningful way related to the imperial family, Konrad III came in by a coup against the named heir, as did Barbarossa. The French meanwhile had five transitions from father to son, with only one 6-year regency.   This consistency in reproduction is one of the key reasons the Capetion dynasty was so much more successful than their German counterparts, though the greatest of the Capetions has only just appeared, Phillipp II Augustus (1180 to 1223). More, and a lot more about him later.

Talking about famous protagonists, the other contemporary of Henry VI is of course Richard the Lionheart (1189 to 1199). Of him we will hear even more.

But today’s episode is mainly about the lay of the land and the first attempt to achieve the main aim of his reign, control of the kingdom of Sicily.

Before we start just a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. And thanks a lot to Tomas, Dennis and Christoph who have already signed up.

Henry VI was born probably in November 1165 as the second son of Frederick Barbarossa and his wife Beatrice of Burgundy. His elder brother died very young and may have had some disability that rendered him unsuited to kingship in the customs of the time. Henry hence grew up as the heir to the throne.

As so often with medieval figures we have little concrete information about his life before he had turned 18. It is likely he received an education to prepare him for the imperial role. That meant he would not just learn how to fight, hunt and drink as his father had, but also in Latin, maybe a smattering of theology and mathematics and obviously reading and writing.

Henry VI did have a passion for the Minnesang, the art of the troubadours who sang about courtly love. The famous Manesse Liederhandschrift, a compilation of medieval love poetry from the late 13th century contains a poem by Henry VI. The poem is a bit so, so and some argue it wasn’t even by him, but it does a reasonable job of conveying the longing for the beloved who he would gladly sacrifice all his crowns and castles for. As we will see, he was not serious about that one.

We hear that his court was a bit jollier than his predecessors’ with travelling Minnesingers, troubadours, musicians and even a fool.  He was very sociable, generous to his friends and enjoyed intelligent conversation. Physically he was less impressive than Barbarossa, skinny and not very tall.

And what was crucial, he had been nurtured for his future role by his father. Since he was 9 years old he followed his father on his journeys to Italy and from place to place in Germany. In 1083, barely 19, he takes part in the complex negotiations that leads to the settlement between Barbarossa and the Lombard Leage.

In 1184 he makes his first appearance in the history books. The Diet of Pentecost in Mainz was the great event where Barbarossa and the Hohenstaufen clan celebrated its recovery from the setbacks and humiliation of the 1170s. Officially it was the to celebrate the knighting of Henry and his younger brother Frederick, Duke of Swabia.

Once Henry had become a knight and was thereby now a full member of the social elite, he took on major responsibilities. He headed a campaign against duke Casimir of Poland in Summer 1184 that concluded with Casimir giving homage to Henry and his father.

It is also in 1184 that an agreement was concluded the results of which will dominate the reign of Henry VI. Barbarossa had agreed with King William II of Sicily, nicknamed “the Good” that Henry would marry his aunt, Constance. Constance was at that point already 30 years old whilst the intended bridegroom was just 19.

Constance was the youngest daughter of King Roger II of Sicily and at that point the only legitimate member of the once so fecund Hauteville family. Her nephew, the current king of Sicily was 32 at the time and by all accounts should still be in with a chance of producing an heir.

But as long as William remained childless, she was the last remaining Hauteville.

We have come across the Kingdom of Sicily quite a few times now, so we do not have to go over the full backstory again. Basically, the Hautevilles had shown up in Southern Italy as mercenaries from the 1030s onwards and had rolled up the Lombard princes, the Byzantines and ultimately the Muslim Emirs of Sicily. In 1130 Roger II had consolidated all of Southern Italy and Sicily in his hand and acquired a royal title from the pope.

The kingdom of Sicily was, at least in the eyes of the Norans and the Popes a fief of the papacy. But as far as fiefs go, the Normans enjoyed a large amount of freedom. They controlled the church in their territory, including the right to select and invest bishops. Their fief could be inherited not just by the sons, but also by daughters and cadet branches. All that had been laid down in a Concordat the papacy had concluded with King Wilhelm I in 1156.

Hence Constance was the true and sole heir of the KIngdom of Sicily.

Which gets you to the point that is really hard to get your head around. A marriage between the heir of the imperial crown and the heir to the crown of Sicily is the very, very last thing the papacy could tolerate, let alone sponsor.

Now that the empire had found a way to collaborate with the Northern Italian cities that gave it a modicum of executive power, acquiring Sicily would put the pope into the chokehold of the emperor. If the empire and Sicily were one political block, the emperor could come down and besiege Italy at will. He could even do that without having to rely in his German knights. Sicily and its wealth was more than enough to muster an army that could march on Rome.

Ever since the Normans appeared they had been a key element of Papal political strategy. One of the reasons Pope Gregory VII could stand up to Emperor Henry IV was down to his alliance with Robert Guiscard. In Rome, the Sicilians and the Empire were roughly equally strong. The Empire may have the ability to muster larger armies, but these could not be kept in Italy for very long, whilst the Sicilians may have less manpower but were closer.

The popes who did not want to swap imperial overlordship with Norman control, played both sides against each other, sometimes involving peripheral powers like the emperor Manuel in Constantinople or the great maritime republic of Venice, Pisa and Genua.

A long as the popes were able to keep the empire and the Normans apart, they were free to pursue their policy of making the seat of Saint Peter the most powerful throne in Europe. And that meant in reverse, if the Normans and the Empire come together, the popes will be demoted to nothing but bishops of Rome.

So how could this engagement and then marriage come about? The pope in 1184 was Lucius III. He was much less of a man than his predecessor Alexander III. He could not reside in Rome where the senate still ruled. And he could not even take over one to the smaller cities in the Papal states, like Terracina or Agnani as some of his predecessors had. Being essentially expelled from his property he lived of the courtesy of the citizens of Verona. Not only his temporal situation was stretched, he also struggled to maintain control of the spiritual framework. As we saw last episode, heretic, anticlerical ideas spread around the growing cities, posing a direct challenge to the authority of the church. Lucius III needed help from secular rulers to confront this fundamental threat. Concerns about the deterioration of the situation in the crusader states may have also played a role.

But all that still cannot explain why the pope did not intervene to stop the engagement. It seems that Alexander III had even proactively supported a rapprochement between Sicily and the empire.

That leaves only one last reason. The great force of history known as cockup. WHatever Lucius III thought about this marriage, it wasn’t the correct assesment.

The actual marriage took place in 1186 in Milan. By now the new pope, Urban III could only look on and grind his teeth. But he could no longer stop the proceeding, setting a train of events in motion that will dominate the history of the empire for more than 50 years.

But let’s go back to Henry’s carreer.in the last years of Barbarossa, Henry became his right hand man. He was involved in the excalating conflict with pope Urban III. In 1186 and 1187 he took charge of Italian affairs including a campaign against the papal lands.

The conflict with the papacy ended when news arrived of the fall of Jerusalem and the popes now needed support from all temporal lords, including the Hohenstaufen. In preparation of the crusade the Reich needed to be secured. And that meant ending the ongoing feud between archbishop Phillip of Cologne and the emperor and to neutralise Henry the Lion.

Henry VI was involved in both efforts, in particular his diplomatic skill helped finding an arrangement with the former imperial chancellor.

As for Henry the Lion, you may remeber that he volunteered to go into exile with his father in Law, Henry II, king of England.

When Barbarossa set out from Regensburg in Mai 1189 to go to his watery grave in the middle of Anatolia, Henry VI took over the affairs of the empire.  As I said before, such a smooth transition to a tried and tested new monarch is exceedingly rare in German history.

His father had barely made it to the Hungarian border before events in London and Palermo put events in motion that will lead, amongst other things, to King Richard the Lionheart being imprisoned on the castle of Trifels.

To understand these events, we need to take a quick look at the main riders and runners in Western Europe in 1190.

Up until now our history was fairly linear. As far as the empire was concerned, the significant players were the papacy, the princes and the powers on the Italian peninsula, i.e., the cities and the Normans. By 1190 the two new powers, France and England can no longer be ignored.

The King of France, Phillippe Auguste was an incredibly tenacious, ruthless and competent ruler who tripled, if not quadrupled the lands directly under royal control during his 43 year reign. We are still at the start of this process and he has not yet acquired Normandy or the County of Toulouse, but he is already shaping up to be the dominant figure in European History of the time.

The king of France’s main interest was dynastic. His objective was to wrestle as many counties and duchies from his great magnates as possible. And the greatest of his magnates was Henry II, King of England. Henry II controlled all of France west of Paris. And that was a lot more than half the Kingdom of France in 1190 given large parts of East and Southeast France were part of the Empire. For Phillippe Auguste this means he has to use absolutely every trick in the book to get ahead. Religious fanaticism, emerging nationalist feeling, bribery, kidnapping, anything goes. And if anything goes, involving the empire in the grand schemes becomes part of the plan, as we will see.

His opponents, Henry II and his brood are no sissies either. they fight back along the same lines. They too will now involve the empire in their schemes which means taking an increasingly active role in German politics.

Barbarossa could still largely ignore the Kings of France and England. All he tried to get from them was recognition of his antipopes, but not a lot more. But for his son, that is no longer the case. The conflict between France and England will last effectively 200 plus years and becomes the vortex into which a bg chunk of European history gets sucked in.

Henry VI’s chessboard has a lot more pieces than his dad, and three of them now fall over in quick successin.

In June 1189 the wife of Henry the Lion, Matilda dies and a week later her father, KIng Henry II of England. For Henry the Lion, exiled former duke of Saxony and Bavaria, this is a problem. Though his family is well regarded at court in England and his sons are close to the new King, Richard the Lionheart, hehimself does not have a role.

Richard is also now preparing for the Third Crusade which Henry the Lion cannot join, since he had just refused Barbarossa’s offer to come along instead of exile. Going to the Holy Land with the King of England would be a unforgiveable insult to his liege lord. He could not go and he could not stay, so he went for the third option, he returned back home to Brunswick.

That was a explicit breach of the oath he had given Barbarossa not to return for three years, i.e., not before 1192. His return created a major domestic crisis for the young emperor Hnery VI, which got worse as Henry the Lion returned to his favourit passtime, capturing his neighbours lands and castles. within a short period of time he had not just regained his old possessions but expanded them significantly.

In October 1189, mere weeks after the Lion’s return Henry VI convened an assembly, condemned Henry the Lion as an enemy of the Empire, banned him and rised an imperial army to subdue him. This army marched into Welf territory but did not get very far as winter fell.

In these December days, the next piece of news arrived that would dominate the young emperor’s life. King William II of Sicily had died unexpectedly at the age of 32.

Constance was the heir to the Norman kingdom!

Well, yes, on paper she was. All the barons of Sicily had sworn an oath to recognise her asqueen should WIlliam II die without offspring. The concordat of 1156 clearly states that the kingdom would be inherited by whoever is the closest legitimate offspring, male of female.

But politically, this was an impossiblity. The new Pope, Clement III, could not tolerate that. Clement III, despite his ill health was a more proactive pope. He managed to return the papacy to the Holy City by settling the constant conflict with the senate of the city. He was also the main organiser of the third crusade where he achieved the near impossible, a truce between Richard the Lionheart and Phillippe Auguste, so both could leave to recapture Jerusalem.

Given the legal situation, pope Clement III had only one option, do something illegal. There was still a branch of the Hauteville family left. Tancred, Count of Lecce was the illegitimate son of Roger of Apulia, a son of King Roger II. As an illegitimate son, he was excluded from the succession, but that did not stop Pope Clement III. Nor did it stop the Sicilian nobles who had sworn allegiance to Constance just 5 years earlier. So they eleveated Tancred to be King of Sicily and he was crowned early in 1190, even before the news had reached Henry VI that his father-in-law had died.

Tancred and his sons Roger and William

I do not believe in a model of history where there are forks in the road that set the train of history invariably down a particular path. But there are moments that put a spotlight on some of the fundamental choices that gradually shift events in a particular direction.

This is one of them. Henry VI has two options in early 1190. He could pursue imperial justice against Henry the Lion who had broken his oath and the crusader peace. Alternatively he could agree a hasty truce with the Welf and mount a military campaign to gain his wife’s inheritance. It is a choice between the interests of the empire and the dynastic interests of the House of Hohenstaufen.

Barbarossa had made his big u-turn in 1167 when he replaced imperial ambition with dynastic ambition. It is a sign of how embedded this political shift had already become that Hnery VI did not hesitate even for a second. Siciliy was what he wanted and let the Saxons sort out their ssues as they want it.

Henry VI signs an agreement with Henry the Lion that is extremely favourable to the Welf. The only commitment was that the two oldest sons of the Lion, Lothar and another Henry were to join the campaign against SIcily. Lothar dies soon afterwards so that only Henry the Welf joins the campaign.

And it is a great campaign. As Barbrossa had now died, Henry had formally become king, making this his first Italian campaign. As a first campaign almost all vassals of the empire were obliged to provide military suppot to the new king’s journey.

The army started to go down to Northern Italy in summer and autumn of 1190. Henry VI followed in the winter. In spring the great host starts moving towards Sicily.

Between Northern Italy and Sicily lies – the Holy City. And it is in Rome where the Pope now resides again and Henry is still only King of the Romans. We are still missing the imperial coronation. And that takes place on April 15th, 1191.

Hang on, what do you say? The pope who was proactively thwarting Henry’s claim on the Sicilian crown was offering an imperial coronation? How does this work.

Good question. I too am confused.

There are a number of things that happened around the same time that could explain it. First up, PopeClement III, the one who had engineered Tancred’s accession had died literally weeks before Hnery VI arrived in Rome. A new pope, Colestin III was duly elected, but as so often with these elections, he needed a moment to bed things down.

Secondly, the popes were in Rome only by the consent of the Senate of Rome. If the pope refused an imperial coronation he would have had to withstand an imperial siege. AN dthat would only work if teh Senate was prepared to go along.

Now the Senate made his own deal with the aspiring Caesar. They were keen on the destruction of the ancient city of Tusculum. Tusculum had been occupied by Imperial troops since 1187 and was a loyal city of the empire. But the Senate wanted it in exchange for a smooth coroantion.

There was nothing to it. Henry VI offered the Senate of Rome the city of Tuscuum on a silver platter. Tusculum fell, its citizens blinded, killed or exiled and its defences razed to the ground. Tusculum founded by Telegonos, the son of Odysseus and Circe, Tusculum that predates the city of Rome itslef and had been its rival since the time of the kings, was no longer. For 900 years it was grazed by goats and today is an archaeological park. Tusculum was the price Henry VI was prepared to pay for an imperial crown.

And so Pope Colestin III crowned Henry and Constance emperor and empress on April 15th, 1191, a day after his own consecration and ordination as a priest.

Immediately after the coronation the army left for the kingdom of Sicily. Pope Coelestin, his hand still wet from anointing the new emperor, protested. He warned that god, or more precisely the interests of the Roman Curia were opposed to the Norman kingdom falling into the hands of the emperor.

Henry and Constance shrugged off these papal objections and simply pointed to their undeniable right as heir of William II.

The army moved towards the border with Apulia. Citoes quickly fell to henry and Constance. Rocc D’arca, Capua, Salerno. Only when they arrived before Naples did they encounter resistance.

Richard of Acerra, the brother in law of Tancred commanded the city’s defences. Naples history goes back ll the way to the 2nd century BC as an early Greek colony. In the 9th century it had become a largely independent duchy that lasted until 1139 when King Roger II incorporated it into his new Sicilian Kingdom. WIth a population of 30,000 it was the second city of the kingdom surpassed only by Palermo.

Its position at the centre of the bay of Naples and its densive walls made a siege entirely depenent upon being able to prevent any resupply by sea. For that purpose Emperor Henry VI had engaged the ever loyal Pisans and Genoese. The Pisan fleet had arrived in May with the land troops and soldiers began running up against the walls, miners were digging tunnels to bring about the collapse of the walls and siege engineers put together terrifying siege engines.

All looks good, though time is of the essence as always in Italy. But it wasn’t time that ran out, but searoom.

One day the fleet of Tancred’s admiral, Margarito shows up in the bay. Margarito, like Tancred himself was a soldier and sailor forged in incessant campaigns against Byzantium, North African emirs, Venice and pretty much anyone else in the Mediterranean. We know little about how the actual seabattle evolved, but in the end the Pisan ships are on the bottom of the sea, the Pisan sailors loccked up in Castelloamare, the castle in the sea before Naples and supply routes into the city are open again.

Henry did not give up though. There was still a Genoese fleet on its way. The Genoese had been delayed for whatever reason, which may have included unwillingness to fight side by side with the Pisans. Both Pisa and Genua had been offered generous trade privileges in Sicily for their support, not an ideal system to ensure cooperation between the two maritime powers.

Whilst Henry is counting down the days until the Genoese arrive, Italy’s greatest and almost undefeated weapon arrives, the summer. and with summer comes disease and death for the Germans. Will they ever learn? Sell in may, go away as we bankers used to say.

It is a rerun on 1167, with a doube twist though. Like in 1167, soldiers and magnates die in droves. It is again the archbishop of Cologne who bites the dust, that is the same archbishop Philipp who so hugely benefitted from the fall of Henry the Lion. The obligatory duke of Bohemia is also on the list and so are many more.

But what we did not see in 1167 were defections. But that is exactly what happened. The younger Henry, son and heir of Henry the Lion went across the ine and joined the defenders of Naples. Such a blatent change of sides, in particular in a foreign war was pretty much unprecedented and further alienated the Welf and Hohenstaufen clans, undoing all the reconciliation work Barbarossa had done in the years post 1152.

But the final blow came from Salerno. As the siege had bedded down, Constance had moved to the nearby city of Salerno to await the outcome. As disiease took hold of the camp outside Naples and the siege was liften, the citizens of Salerno and their archbishop panicked. They had opened the gates to Henry and Constance without the slightest bit of resistance. They had welcome the empress in an effort to ingratiate themselves with the new rulers and maybe get some priveleges or even royal protection.

Now that Henry’s army was defeated Tancred would be back and he will take revenge on the treasonous citizens of Salerno. It did not matter that other cities had opened their gates as well. Salerno had stuck its neck out further than the rest and that means it would be cut off.

In their distress they did the only thing that would rescue them from certain destruction. They arrested the empress Constance and delivered her as a prisoner to King Tancred in Palermo.  

Henry, who had picked up the disease himself was lying on his sickbed at the monastery of Montecassino when he heard about his wife’s arrest. All seems lost. But it was not.

Henry VI recovered and returned to Germany. En route he meets King Philippe Auguste of France. As the two men swapped stories, talk began about a short stop Phillippe Auguste and Richard the Lionheart had made in Messina.

There the two kings had met the usurper King Tancred. Whilt Phillippe Auguste kept his distance, Richard the Lionheart pushed the “hey we are both Normans” card. Tancred was not quite as excited about his long lost cousin, but after the Lionheart’s soldiers had sacked messina he started seeing the family resemblance. Tancred and Richard made a deal whereby Richard recognised Tancred as legitimate king of Sicily and promised him support in case of an attack. In return, Tancred gave him a busload of cash, officially a refund of the dowry of Richard’s sister who had married William II and a contribution to the crusdae, but in reality, just money into Richard’s pocket. And Tancred promise dto make Rihard’s younger brother Arthur of Brittany the heir to the kingdom.

How much this alliance was worth to Tancred is surely in doubt, but from Henry’s perspective this English king seems to be behind all the things that had gone wrong so far. He had supported Henry the Lion’s return to Brunswick, he supported Tancred of Hauteville and he may have indirectly encouraged the unimaginable defection of an imperial prince. All of that was not only politically irritating, but also a breach of imperial law. Henry VI hence declared Richard the Lionheart an enemy of the empire. And Richard will soon appear inside the empire, more specifically in the lands of Leopold of Austria, a man Richard had insulted during his stint in the Holy Land. Leopold was not the only one he insulted, but the only one whose lands he decided to cross on his way home.

How this will pan out you may know already, but what Henry VI does with the money, you may not. We will see about that next time. As I am still on holiday, I know, its rude, timing for the next episode may again be a bit later than usual. Apologies for that.

Before I go, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patreon.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to start with me endorsing mattresses or meal kits. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. As always, all the links are in the show notes.