Emperor Henry VI takes over

When Barbarossa drowns in the river Saleph in 1190 the crown transfers to his eldest surviving son, Henry, known to History as Henry VI.

This is the first time since the accession to personal rule of Emperor Henry III in 1039 that the imperial crown moves from father to grown up son without a glitch. In the previous 150 years, the passing of an emperor had been a dramatic event where all the cards were dealt anew. Just remember, Henry IV came to the throne as a child, Henry V by rebellion against his father, Lother III wasn’t in any meaningful way related to the imperial family, Konrad III came in by a coup against the named heir, as did Barbarossa. The French meanwhile had five transitions from father to son, with only one 6-year regency.   This consistency in reproduction is one of the key reasons the Capetion dynasty was so much more successful than their German counterparts, though the greatest of the Capetions has only just appeared, Phillipp II Augustus (1180 to 1223). More, and a lot more about him later.

Talking about famous protagonists, the other contemporary of Henry VI is of course Richard the Lionheart (1189 to 1199). Of him we will hear even more.

But today’s episode is mainly about the lay of the land and the first attempt to achieve the main aim of his reign, control of the kingdom of Sicily.

Transcript

Hello and Welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 70 – From Father to Son

I know, I know, you were expecting another Germany in 1200 episode, talking about feudalism and chivalric culture. And that was really the episode I wanted to produce. But as it happened, Clio, the muse of history refused to kiss me, an event much reminiscent of my teenage years.

I probably read too many books and articles on feudalism which left me utterly confused with nothing interesting to say. I would never dare to say that this debate, on which so many eminent historians have voiced an opinion is nothing but a wild goose chase. I have someone to do that for me. If you want to hear a straightforward perspective on what feudalism was, check out lecture 5 of the High Middle Ages course on the Great Courses Plus. Philip Daileader does a much better job of it than I could do.

Which means we can resume our narrative again! Hurrah!

When Barbarossa drowns in the river Saleph in 1190 the crown transfers to his eldest surviving son, Henry, known to History as Henry VI.

This is the first time since the accession to personal rule of Emperor Henry III in 1039 that the imperial crown moves from father to grown up son without a glitch. In the previous 150 years, the passing of an emperor had been a dramatic event where all the cards were dealt anew. Just remember, Henry IV came to the throne as a child, Henry V by rebellion against his father, Lother III wasn’t in any meaningful way related to the imperial family, Konrad III came in by a coup against the named heir, as did Barbarossa. The French meanwhile had five transitions from father to son, with only one 6-year regency.   This consistency in reproduction is one of the key reasons the Capetion dynasty was so much more successful than their German counterparts, though the greatest of the Capetions has only just appeared, Phillipp II Augustus (1180 to 1223). More, and a lot more about him later.

Talking about famous protagonists, the other contemporary of Henry VI is of course Richard the Lionheart (1189 to 1199). Of him we will hear even more.

But today’s episode is mainly about the lay of the land and the first attempt to achieve the main aim of his reign, control of the kingdom of Sicily.

Before we start just a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. And thanks a lot to Tomas, Dennis and Christoph who have already signed up.

Henry VI was born probably in November 1165 as the second son of Frederick Barbarossa and his wife Beatrice of Burgundy. His elder brother died very young and may have had some disability that rendered him unsuited to kingship in the customs of the time. Henry hence grew up as the heir to the throne.

As so often with medieval figures we have little concrete information about his life before he had turned 18. It is likely he received an education to prepare him for the imperial role. That meant he would not just learn how to fight, hunt and drink as his father had, but also in Latin, maybe a smattering of theology and mathematics and obviously reading and writing.

Henry VI did have a passion for the Minnesang, the art of the troubadours who sang about courtly love. The famous Manesse Liederhandschrift, a compilation of medieval love poetry from the late 13th century contains a poem by Henry VI. The poem is a bit so, so and some argue it wasn’t even by him, but it does a reasonable job of conveying the longing for the beloved who he would gladly sacrifice all his crowns and castles for. As we will see, he was not serious about that one.

We hear that his court was a bit jollier than his predecessors’ with travelling Minnesingers, troubadours, musicians and even a fool.  He was very sociable, generous to his friends and enjoyed intelligent conversation. Physically he was less impressive than Barbarossa, skinny and not very tall.

And what was crucial, he had been nurtured for his future role by his father. Since he was 9 years old he followed his father on his journeys to Italy and from place to place in Germany. In 1083, barely 19, he takes part in the complex negotiations that leads to the settlement between Barbarossa and the Lombard Leage.

In 1184 he makes his first appearance in the history books. The Diet of Pentecost in Mainz was the great event where Barbarossa and the Hohenstaufen clan celebrated its recovery from the setbacks and humiliation of the 1170s. Officially it was the to celebrate the knighting of Henry and his younger brother Frederick, Duke of Swabia.

Once Henry had become a knight and was thereby now a full member of the social elite, he took on major responsibilities. He headed a campaign against duke Casimir of Poland in Summer 1184 that concluded with Casimir giving homage to Henry and his father.

It is also in 1184 that an agreement was concluded the results of which will dominate the reign of Henry VI. Barbarossa had agreed with King William II of Sicily, nicknamed “the Good” that Henry would marry his aunt, Constance. Constance was at that point already 30 years old whilst the intended bridegroom was just 19.

Constance was the youngest daughter of King Roger II of Sicily and at that point the only legitimate member of the once so fecund Hauteville family. Her nephew, the current king of Sicily was 32 at the time and by all accounts should still be in with a chance of producing an heir.

But as long as William remained childless, she was the last remaining Hauteville.

We have come across the Kingdom of Sicily quite a few times now, so we do not have to go over the full backstory again. Basically, the Hautevilles had shown up in Southern Italy as mercenaries from the 1030s onwards and had rolled up the Lombard princes, the Byzantines and ultimately the Muslim Emirs of Sicily. In 1130 Roger II had consolidated all of Southern Italy and Sicily in his hand and acquired a royal title from the pope.

The kingdom of Sicily was, at least in the eyes of the Norans and the Popes a fief of the papacy. But as far as fiefs go, the Normans enjoyed a large amount of freedom. They controlled the church in their territory, including the right to select and invest bishops. Their fief could be inherited not just by the sons, but also by daughters and cadet branches. All that had been laid down in a Concordat the papacy had concluded with King Wilhelm I in 1156.

Hence Constance was the true and sole heir of the KIngdom of Sicily.

Which gets you to the point that is really hard to get your head around. A marriage between the heir of the imperial crown and the heir to the crown of Sicily is the very, very last thing the papacy could tolerate, let alone sponsor.

Now that the empire had found a way to collaborate with the Northern Italian cities that gave it a modicum of executive power, acquiring Sicily would put the pope into the chokehold of the emperor. If the empire and Sicily were one political block, the emperor could come down and besiege Italy at will. He could even do that without having to rely in his German knights. Sicily and its wealth was more than enough to muster an army that could march on Rome.

Ever since the Normans appeared they had been a key element of Papal political strategy. One of the reasons Pope Gregory VII could stand up to Emperor Henry IV was down to his alliance with Robert Guiscard. In Rome, the Sicilians and the Empire were roughly equally strong. The Empire may have the ability to muster larger armies, but these could not be kept in Italy for very long, whilst the Sicilians may have less manpower but were closer.

The popes who did not want to swap imperial overlordship with Norman control, played both sides against each other, sometimes involving peripheral powers like the emperor Manuel in Constantinople or the great maritime republic of Venice, Pisa and Genua.

A long as the popes were able to keep the empire and the Normans apart, they were free to pursue their policy of making the seat of Saint Peter the most powerful throne in Europe. And that meant in reverse, if the Normans and the Empire come together, the popes will be demoted to nothing but bishops of Rome.

So how could this engagement and then marriage come about? The pope in 1184 was Lucius III. He was much less of a man than his predecessor Alexander III. He could not reside in Rome where the senate still ruled. And he could not even take over one to the smaller cities in the Papal states, like Terracina or Agnani as some of his predecessors had. Being essentially expelled from his property he lived of the courtesy of the citizens of Verona. Not only his temporal situation was stretched, he also struggled to maintain control of the spiritual framework. As we saw last episode, heretic, anticlerical ideas spread around the growing cities, posing a direct challenge to the authority of the church. Lucius III needed help from secular rulers to confront this fundamental threat. Concerns about the deterioration of the situation in the crusader states may have also played a role.

But all that still cannot explain why the pope did not intervene to stop the engagement. It seems that Alexander III had even proactively supported a rapprochement between Sicily and the empire.

That leaves only one last reason. The great force of history known as cockup. WHatever Lucius III thought about this marriage, it wasn’t the correct assesment.

The actual marriage took place in 1186 in Milan. By now the new pope, Urban III could only look on and grind his teeth. But he could no longer stop the proceeding, setting a train of events in motion that will dominate the history of the empire for more than 50 years.

But let’s go back to Henry’s carreer.in the last years of Barbarossa, Henry became his right hand man. He was involved in the excalating conflict with pope Urban III. In 1186 and 1187 he took charge of Italian affairs including a campaign against the papal lands.

The conflict with the papacy ended when news arrived of the fall of Jerusalem and the popes now needed support from all temporal lords, including the Hohenstaufen. In preparation of the crusade the Reich needed to be secured. And that meant ending the ongoing feud between archbishop Phillip of Cologne and the emperor and to neutralise Henry the Lion.

Henry VI was involved in both efforts, in particular his diplomatic skill helped finding an arrangement with the former imperial chancellor.

As for Henry the Lion, you may remeber that he volunteered to go into exile with his father in Law, Henry II, king of England.

When Barbarossa set out from Regensburg in Mai 1189 to go to his watery grave in the middle of Anatolia, Henry VI took over the affairs of the empire.  As I said before, such a smooth transition to a tried and tested new monarch is exceedingly rare in German history.

His father had barely made it to the Hungarian border before events in London and Palermo put events in motion that will lead, amongst other things, to King Richard the Lionheart being imprisoned on the castle of Trifels.

To understand these events, we need to take a quick look at the main riders and runners in Western Europe in 1190.

Up until now our history was fairly linear. As far as the empire was concerned, the significant players were the papacy, the princes and the powers on the Italian peninsula, i.e., the cities and the Normans. By 1190 the two new powers, France and England can no longer be ignored.

The King of France, Phillippe Auguste was an incredibly tenacious, ruthless and competent ruler who tripled, if not quadrupled the lands directly under royal control during his 43 year reign. We are still at the start of this process and he has not yet acquired Normandy or the County of Toulouse, but he is already shaping up to be the dominant figure in European History of the time.

The king of France’s main interest was dynastic. His objective was to wrestle as many counties and duchies from his great magnates as possible. And the greatest of his magnates was Henry II, King of England. Henry II controlled all of France west of Paris. And that was a lot more than half the Kingdom of France in 1190 given large parts of East and Southeast France were part of the Empire. For Phillippe Auguste this means he has to use absolutely every trick in the book to get ahead. Religious fanaticism, emerging nationalist feeling, bribery, kidnapping, anything goes. And if anything goes, involving the empire in the grand schemes becomes part of the plan, as we will see.

His opponents, Henry II and his brood are no sissies either. they fight back along the same lines. They too will now involve the empire in their schemes which means taking an increasingly active role in German politics.

Barbarossa could still largely ignore the Kings of France and England. All he tried to get from them was recognition of his antipopes, but not a lot more. But for his son, that is no longer the case. The conflict between France and England will last effectively 200 plus years and becomes the vortex into which a bg chunk of European history gets sucked in.

Henry VI’s chessboard has a lot more pieces than his dad, and three of them now fall over in quick successin.

In June 1189 the wife of Henry the Lion, Matilda dies and a week later her father, KIng Henry II of England. For Henry the Lion, exiled former duke of Saxony and Bavaria, this is a problem. Though his family is well regarded at court in England and his sons are close to the new King, Richard the Lionheart, hehimself does not have a role.

Richard is also now preparing for the Third Crusade which Henry the Lion cannot join, since he had just refused Barbarossa’s offer to come along instead of exile. Going to the Holy Land with the King of England would be a unforgiveable insult to his liege lord. He could not go and he could not stay, so he went for the third option, he returned back home to Brunswick.

That was a explicit breach of the oath he had given Barbarossa not to return for three years, i.e., not before 1192. His return created a major domestic crisis for the young emperor Hnery VI, which got worse as Henry the Lion returned to his favourit passtime, capturing his neighbours lands and castles. within a short period of time he had not just regained his old possessions but expanded them significantly.

In October 1189, mere weeks after the Lion’s return Henry VI convened an assembly, condemned Henry the Lion as an enemy of the Empire, banned him and rised an imperial army to subdue him. This army marched into Welf territory but did not get very far as winter fell.

In these December days, the next piece of news arrived that would dominate the young emperor’s life. King William II of Sicily had died unexpectedly at the age of 32.

Constance was the heir to the Norman kingdom!

Well, yes, on paper she was. All the barons of Sicily had sworn an oath to recognise her asqueen should WIlliam II die without offspring. The concordat of 1156 clearly states that the kingdom would be inherited by whoever is the closest legitimate offspring, male of female.

But politically, this was an impossiblity. The new Pope, Clement III, could not tolerate that. Clement III, despite his ill health was a more proactive pope. He managed to return the papacy to the Holy City by settling the constant conflict with the senate of the city. He was also the main organiser of the third crusade where he achieved the near impossible, a truce between Richard the Lionheart and Phillippe Auguste, so both could leave to recapture Jerusalem.

Given the legal situation, pope Clement III had only one option, do something illegal. There was still a branch of the Hauteville family left. Tancred, Count of Lecce was the illegitimate son of Roger of Apulia, a son of King Roger II. As an illegitimate son, he was excluded from the succession, but that did not stop Pope Clement III. Nor did it stop the Sicilian nobles who had sworn allegiance to Constance just 5 years earlier. So they eleveated Tancred to be King of Sicily and he was crowned early in 1190, even before the news had reached Henry VI that his father-in-law had died.

Tancred and his sons Roger and William

I do not believe in a model of history where there are forks in the road that set the train of history invariably down a particular path. But there are moments that put a spotlight on some of the fundamental choices that gradually shift events in a particular direction.

This is one of them. Henry VI has two options in early 1190. He could pursue imperial justice against Henry the Lion who had broken his oath and the crusader peace. Alternatively he could agree a hasty truce with the Welf and mount a military campaign to gain his wife’s inheritance. It is a choice between the interests of the empire and the dynastic interests of the House of Hohenstaufen.

Barbarossa had made his big u-turn in 1167 when he replaced imperial ambition with dynastic ambition. It is a sign of how embedded this political shift had already become that Hnery VI did not hesitate even for a second. Siciliy was what he wanted and let the Saxons sort out their ssues as they want it.

Henry VI signs an agreement with Henry the Lion that is extremely favourable to the Welf. The only commitment was that the two oldest sons of the Lion, Lothar and another Henry were to join the campaign against SIcily. Lothar dies soon afterwards so that only Henry the Welf joins the campaign.

And it is a great campaign. As Barbrossa had now died, Henry had formally become king, making this his first Italian campaign. As a first campaign almost all vassals of the empire were obliged to provide military suppot to the new king’s journey.

The army started to go down to Northern Italy in summer and autumn of 1190. Henry VI followed in the winter. In spring the great host starts moving towards Sicily.

Between Northern Italy and Sicily lies – the Holy City. And it is in Rome where the Pope now resides again and Henry is still only King of the Romans. We are still missing the imperial coronation. And that takes place on April 15th, 1191.

Hang on, what do you say? The pope who was proactively thwarting Henry’s claim on the Sicilian crown was offering an imperial coronation? How does this work.

Good question. I too am confused.

There are a number of things that happened around the same time that could explain it. First up, PopeClement III, the one who had engineered Tancred’s accession had died literally weeks before Hnery VI arrived in Rome. A new pope, Colestin III was duly elected, but as so often with these elections, he needed a moment to bed things down.

Secondly, the popes were in Rome only by the consent of the Senate of Rome. If the pope refused an imperial coronation he would have had to withstand an imperial siege. AN dthat would only work if teh Senate was prepared to go along.

Now the Senate made his own deal with the aspiring Caesar. They were keen on the destruction of the ancient city of Tusculum. Tusculum had been occupied by Imperial troops since 1187 and was a loyal city of the empire. But the Senate wanted it in exchange for a smooth coroantion.

There was nothing to it. Henry VI offered the Senate of Rome the city of Tuscuum on a silver platter. Tusculum fell, its citizens blinded, killed or exiled and its defences razed to the ground. Tusculum founded by Telegonos, the son of Odysseus and Circe, Tusculum that predates the city of Rome itslef and had been its rival since the time of the kings, was no longer. For 900 years it was grazed by goats and today is an archaeological park. Tusculum was the price Henry VI was prepared to pay for an imperial crown.

And so Pope Colestin III crowned Henry and Constance emperor and empress on April 15th, 1191, a day after his own consecration and ordination as a priest.

Immediately after the coronation the army left for the kingdom of Sicily. Pope Coelestin, his hand still wet from anointing the new emperor, protested. He warned that god, or more precisely the interests of the Roman Curia were opposed to the Norman kingdom falling into the hands of the emperor.

Henry and Constance shrugged off these papal objections and simply pointed to their undeniable right as heir of William II.

The army moved towards the border with Apulia. Citoes quickly fell to henry and Constance. Rocc D’arca, Capua, Salerno. Only when they arrived before Naples did they encounter resistance.

Richard of Acerra, the brother in law of Tancred commanded the city’s defences. Naples history goes back ll the way to the 2nd century BC as an early Greek colony. In the 9th century it had become a largely independent duchy that lasted until 1139 when King Roger II incorporated it into his new Sicilian Kingdom. WIth a population of 30,000 it was the second city of the kingdom surpassed only by Palermo.

Its position at the centre of the bay of Naples and its densive walls made a siege entirely depenent upon being able to prevent any resupply by sea. For that purpose Emperor Henry VI had engaged the ever loyal Pisans and Genoese. The Pisan fleet had arrived in May with the land troops and soldiers began running up against the walls, miners were digging tunnels to bring about the collapse of the walls and siege engineers put together terrifying siege engines.

All looks good, though time is of the essence as always in Italy. But it wasn’t time that ran out, but searoom.

One day the fleet of Tancred’s admiral, Margarito shows up in the bay. Margarito, like Tancred himself was a soldier and sailor forged in incessant campaigns against Byzantium, North African emirs, Venice and pretty much anyone else in the Mediterranean. We know little about how the actual seabattle evolved, but in the end the Pisan ships are on the bottom of the sea, the Pisan sailors loccked up in Castelloamare, the castle in the sea before Naples and supply routes into the city are open again.

Henry did not give up though. There was still a Genoese fleet on its way. The Genoese had been delayed for whatever reason, which may have included unwillingness to fight side by side with the Pisans. Both Pisa and Genua had been offered generous trade privileges in Sicily for their support, not an ideal system to ensure cooperation between the two maritime powers.

Whilst Henry is counting down the days until the Genoese arrive, Italy’s greatest and almost undefeated weapon arrives, the summer. and with summer comes disease and death for the Germans. Will they ever learn? Sell in may, go away as we bankers used to say.

It is a rerun on 1167, with a doube twist though. Like in 1167, soldiers and magnates die in droves. It is again the archbishop of Cologne who bites the dust, that is the same archbishop Philipp who so hugely benefitted from the fall of Henry the Lion. The obligatory duke of Bohemia is also on the list and so are many more.

But what we did not see in 1167 were defections. But that is exactly what happened. The younger Henry, son and heir of Henry the Lion went across the ine and joined the defenders of Naples. Such a blatent change of sides, in particular in a foreign war was pretty much unprecedented and further alienated the Welf and Hohenstaufen clans, undoing all the reconciliation work Barbarossa had done in the years post 1152.

But the final blow came from Salerno. As the siege had bedded down, Constance had moved to the nearby city of Salerno to await the outcome. As disiease took hold of the camp outside Naples and the siege was liften, the citizens of Salerno and their archbishop panicked. They had opened the gates to Henry and Constance without the slightest bit of resistance. They had welcome the empress in an effort to ingratiate themselves with the new rulers and maybe get some priveleges or even royal protection.

Now that Henry’s army was defeated Tancred would be back and he will take revenge on the treasonous citizens of Salerno. It did not matter that other cities had opened their gates as well. Salerno had stuck its neck out further than the rest and that means it would be cut off.

In their distress they did the only thing that would rescue them from certain destruction. They arrested the empress Constance and delivered her as a prisoner to King Tancred in Palermo.  

Henry, who had picked up the disease himself was lying on his sickbed at the monastery of Montecassino when he heard about his wife’s arrest. All seems lost. But it was not.

Henry VI recovered and returned to Germany. En route he meets King Philippe Auguste of France. As the two men swapped stories, talk began about a short stop Phillippe Auguste and Richard the Lionheart had made in Messina.

There the two kings had met the usurper King Tancred. Whilt Phillippe Auguste kept his distance, Richard the Lionheart pushed the “hey we are both Normans” card. Tancred was not quite as excited about his long lost cousin, but after the Lionheart’s soldiers had sacked messina he started seeing the family resemblance. Tancred and Richard made a deal whereby Richard recognised Tancred as legitimate king of Sicily and promised him support in case of an attack. In return, Tancred gave him a busload of cash, officially a refund of the dowry of Richard’s sister who had married William II and a contribution to the crusdae, but in reality, just money into Richard’s pocket. And Tancred promise dto make Rihard’s younger brother Arthur of Brittany the heir to the kingdom.

How much this alliance was worth to Tancred is surely in doubt, but from Henry’s perspective this English king seems to be behind all the things that had gone wrong so far. He had supported Henry the Lion’s return to Brunswick, he supported Tancred of Hauteville and he may have indirectly encouraged the unimaginable defection of an imperial prince. All of that was not only politically irritating, but also a breach of imperial law. Henry VI hence declared Richard the Lionheart an enemy of the empire. And Richard will soon appear inside the empire, more specifically in the lands of Leopold of Austria, a man Richard had insulted during his stint in the Holy Land. Leopold was not the only one he insulted, but the only one whose lands he decided to cross on his way home.

How this will pan out you may know already, but what Henry VI does with the money, you may not. We will see about that next time. As I am still on holiday, I know, its rude, timing for the next episode may again be a bit later than usual. Apologies for that.

Before I go, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patreon.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to start with me endorsing mattresses or meal kits. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. As always, all the links are in the show notes.   

The Emperor asleep under the Kyffhaeuser Mountain

This week, after 15 episodes we will finally leave the emperor Barbarossa behind, though it is almost impossible to ever get away from him. No other medieval ruler is still so present in the national psyche, not as the man he was but as the myth he was turned into. So today we say goodbye to the man and next time we will take a look at the myth. 

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 66 – The myths of Barbarossa

We have just spent 15 episodes talking about the life and times of the actual Frederick Barbarossa. Exciting as his life was, his afterlife is almost as interesting. Don’t panic I will not go on for 15 episodes talking about the perception of the great emperor. Just give me 30 minutes and I promise it is worth it.

But before we start as always, a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. Thanks a lot, to Annemie and Jim who have already signed up. And thanks Annemie for your regular support on Facebook – much appreciated.

As we mentioned last week, in its immediate aftermath emperor Barbarossa’s death was seen as a bad one. Drowning in a river that all his companions crossed without a glitch, taken just when he was going to Jerusalem to fulfil what he believed to be his destiny and not having confessed before he died. This could only mean one thing, God disapproved of the venture and of the man.

It took until the mid-13th century for chroniclers and acolytes of the Hohenstaufen to wash off the stain of an unconfessed death. They alter the story so that Barbarossa gets dragged out of the river half dead but fit enough to properly confess before dying.

That helps his legacy but does not yet make him the shining beacon of the imperial dynasty.

Once the house of Hohenstaufen had fallen the Holy Roman empire went into a chaotic period often called the interregnum. Popular myth sprang up, talking again of a Last Emperor who would bring about the end of time. But that emperor was not Frederick Barbarossa, but his grandson, Frederick II. Frederick II had died in Sicily in 1250 and is buried in Palermo, a long way from Germany. Papal propaganda had falsely declared him dead several times before he actually died, which is why rumours kept going around that he was still alive.

False Fredericks would appear in Germany, claiming to be the emperor himself or at least his trueborn son. One of these, a man named Tile Kolup manages to set up his own court, corresponds with several princes, takes over the city of Wetzlar and had to be brought down by an army sent by king Rudolf of Habsburg.

Tile Kolup’s claim was made even more believable by the appearance of a “black chamberlain”.

As time went by the probability of the actual emperor coming back turned into a myth that Frederick II was simply asleep waiting for the moment his people really needed him. Once he wakes up, so the folk tales believed, he would perform the acts of the last emperor, take Jerusalem, put down his crown in the church of the Holy sepulchre and bring about a 1000-year long reign during which Satan would be chained.

The hope for the return of the emperor Frederick remained strong for centuries and a many pseudo-Fredericks emerged, mainly in periods of stress and turmoil. When the Black Death hit in 1348 the Franciscan friar John of Wintherthur reported alarming tales of Frederick’s imminent return. Frederick, he reports would bring full justice to everyone. Stolen property will be returned to widows and orphans and -great news – poor maidens would be married to rich men and working-class lads to wealthy cougars. That he thought was great, but what frightened the friar was that the emperor was eager to persecute the clergy so that if they have no other means of hiding their tonsures, they will cover them with cow dung. The word that describes that kind of headgear has no room in a family show, though it is apparently it is also a popular card game.

Just as the reformation is getting going, the figures of Frederick II and Barbarossa started to merge into one. In 1519 the “Folk Book of the Emperor Frederick Barbarossa” appears in print. It offers a weird concoction of historic events of both emperors but ascribes all of them to Barbarossa. It also made up a few, including that Barbarossa had been betrayed to Saladin by the pope, then took revenge on Venice where the pope allegedly lived. The pope in his extreme arrogance ordered Frederick to kneel and put his foot on the imperial neck, a treatment he accepted out of misguided piety.  And, Barbarossa did not die in the river Saleph but still lives in a hollow mountain. He would rise again and – so the unknown authors believe, will return to punish the clergy.

And with that his avatar is off to the races. From this point forward at all the major junctions of German history the shadow of the old emperor appears, every time taking on a new guise that reflects the dreams and hopes of his people.

The first to press this mythical Barbarossa into national service are the protestants.

The story of pope Alexander III putting his foot on the neck of the German emperor is reprinted ferociously and formed part of antipapal and anticlerical propaganda. Luther himself believed that his patron, the elector Frederick the Wise of Saxony who was a descendant of Barbarossa had fulfilled part of the prophecy by freeing the church from the shackles of papal control. Barbarossa in the protestant interpretation was the defender of the true faith against the corrupt church hierarchy.

It is around this time that the location of the hollow mountain where Barbarossa allegedly sleeps shifts to the Kyffhaeuser mountain, the central part of a small mountain range in Thuringia. The plateau of the Kyffhaeuser had been the site of a castle originally built by Henry IV and enlarged by Barbarossa. The Pfalz of Tilleda, site of several royal assemblies lies just below the mountain. Barbarossa had been there, though it was not one of his habitual residences. Why he was believed to be there and not somewhere near say Gelnhausen or Kaiserslautern, places he had built and stayed very regularly is a unclear. It may have to do with a battle during the peasant’s war or an event in 1546 where 300 people saw an old, bearded man walking through the woods and mistook him for the ancient emperor.

In subsequent centuries Barbarossa disappeared from people’s minds. The enlightenment and its total disdain for the Middle Ages had no room for such old folk tales. Barbarossa became nothing but a silly fable.

It was the Romantics who rediscovered Barbarossa and the tale of his sleep inside the Kyffhaeuser mountain. They had begun to discover the Hohenstaufens initially as a source for dramatic stories. The tale of Agnes, daughter of Barbarossa’s half-brother who eloped with Henry of Brunswick, member of the house of Welf and eternal enemy of the Hohenstaufen was turned into some Germanic Juliet.

There were also nearly 100 plays or fragments of plays about Konradin, the last of the Hohenstaufen who ended his life being beheaded on the main square of Naples upon orders of Charles of Anjou. That story provided an ideal foil to project all the great Germanic values onto Konradin and paint Charles as a perfidious Frenchman.

The resurrection of the myth of Barbarossa was down to the Brothers Grimm. The brothers grimm, the ones who wrote Cinderella, Rumpelstiltzkin, Snow White, Hansel and Gretel, Little Red Riding hood, Rapunzel, Sleeping Beaty, Puss in Boots, the thing about kissing a frog and 575 more. Essentially most all Disney’s movie output before they hit upon Marvel movies and the concept of massively overstretching minor characters in Star Wars sagas. Anyway, one of those 585 tales was a brief story that Barbarossa was sitting at a stone table inside the Kyffhaeser Mountain, his beard already long enough to go twice around the table and waiting to be woken. He woke up from time to time to check whether the ravens were still circling the mountain. As long as they did, he would have to sleep for another 100 years.

Brothers Grimm

In 1816 this story catches fire. The Napoleonic wars have just ended. Led by Prussia many German states have fought and defeated the French at the battle of the Nations near Leipzig and at Waterloo. For the first time volunteers, the Freikorps, fought, not for some prince or king, but for themselves, their freedom and their country.

The glorious war was followed by a disappointing peace. The great powers, England, Austria, Russia, Prussia and Bourbon France agreed on a system of mutual support for autocratic rule. This was a bitter pill for both the liberal and the nationalists who had dreamed of a unified Germany with some form of democratic participation.

Similar to that other fragmented country in Europe, Italy, the Germans desperately searched for a national narrative that fit with their hopes and beliefs. I talked a bit about that in episode 20 – A Blank Canvas where we explored how the Ottonians were used and abused in the various definitions of the national destiny.

Otto the Great and Henry the Fowler were major components of this historymaking, but the myth of Barbarossa is the Granddaddy of them all. The reason he is so compelling is that his story includes a rebirth of the broken empire. Barbarossa had inherited a realm torn apart by civil war. That civil war could at least partially be blamed on foreigners, most specifically the popes.

Barbarossa brought back peace and unity, let others participate in the state, rebuild the honour of the empire and faced up against the most powerful force of his time, the popes and their allies. That fits neatly into what the pre 1848 generation dreamed of – unity, freedom and national pride.  

Friedrich Ruckert brings it all together in a poem from 1817. It goes like this:

The ancient Barbarossa,

Frederick the Kaiser great,

Within the castle cavern,

sits in enchanted state

He did not die; but ever

Waits in the chamber deep,

Where hidden under the castle

He sat himself to sleep

The splendour of the Empire

He took with him away

And back to earth will bring it

When dawns the promised day.

This poem used to be the German equivalent of “Paul Revere’s ride”. Compulsory reading for schoolchildren after 1871 and shaping many an impressionable mind.

In 1848 a group of Patriots climb the Kyffhaeser Mountain, raise the Black, Red, Gold flag of the national revolution and sing a poem meant to waken the ancient emperor. Barbarossa, we heard, did not wake up.

Barbarossa becomes the icon of the yearning for national unity.

The Barbarossa enthusiasm did have its critics though, Heinrich Heine most prominent amongst them.

Heine wrote a poem, Germany, a Winter’s tale. It was a satirical look at what he saw as the backwardness of the country in 1844, its obsession with the Middle Ages and Militarism that made him fearful of the future.

His poem begins with: “Denk ich an Deutschland in der Nacht, bin ich um den Schlaf gebracht” which translates as “When I think of Germany at night, it puts my sleep to flight”. And other great ones like his observation about Prussian soldiers: “als hätten sie den Stock verschluckt mit dem sie einst geschlagen“ again translates as „as if they had swallowed the rod they had once been beaten with.

Okay, full disclosure, I love Heinrich Heine. Heine believed Barbarossa to be a useless, old relic that epitomises the parochialism, the dream of ancient glories that blinds his compatriots to the ideals of liberty, freedom and brotherhood the French Revolution had created.  

Heine takes goes straight for the mythical emperors jugular.

In a dream he finds the emperor not sitting at his table but shuffling through the vast halls of his lair filled to the brim with weapons and thousands of sleeping soldiers all waiting for his call to rise up and free the German people. Asked why he has not yet acted, Barbarossa replies that he is still not quite happy with the number of horses at his disposal. “I wait until their number is complete and then I will strike and free my people who will wait faithfully for my arrival”. Va piano, va sano he says.

Having delighted the old emperor with tales of the guillotine and the demise of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette he goes:

“Sir Redbeard! – I cried out loud – You’re a mythical creation. Go, off to sleep! Without your help we’ll work out our salvation. The republicans would laugh at us If a ghost with sceptre and crown came marching as the head of our ranks – They’d laugh us out of town. It would be best if you stayed at home here in the old Kyffhauser – When I consider the matter carefully, It is clear we don’t need a Kaiser.”

Heinrich Heine was as ever so often right, but again, as ever so often, his call remained unheeded.

A Kaiser duly appeared in 1871, Wilhelm I. A man with a luxurious white beard that would make any hipster go green with envy. In this next iteration of the Barbarossa myth, he, William I became Barbablanca, the White beard successor to Barbarossa Redbeard and the man who fulfilled his mission, as saviour of the country.

For that to happen a number of obstacles had to be overcome. The first one was that the Hohenzollerns did not have much affinity to Barbarossa. The kings of Prussia were relative nouveau riches amongst the great German families. Their ancestors had been the counts of Zollern whilst the other major families in the empire, the Wittelsbachs of Bavaria, the Wettin of Saxony and the Zaehringer of Baden had already been imperial princes in the 12th century.  Moreover, the Holy Roman Empire of Barbarossa was usually associated with the Habsburgs, the Prussians main rival for dominance in Germany

The politician and historian Johann Gustav Droysen tried to bridge the gap. He pointed out that the Hohenstaufen had also risen from obscure beginnings to dukes of Swabia in 1079 and proceeded from there to unite the empire. More than that, Barbarossa’s anti-papal policies mirrored those of protestant Prussia.

At the same time as Droysen was moulding a 12th century emperor into a 19th century role model, genuine historians got to work on the Middle Ages.

The towering figure here is Wilhelm von Giesebrecht whose monumental Geschichte der Deutschen Kaiserzeit” or ”History of the German imperial times” graced most middle class households in the same way Gibbons Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire was de rigeur on British bookshelves.

Now I have to make a confession. I have a soft spot for Giesebrecht. Sure, he is a product of his time and some of his views can make your toes curl up and some of his findings have by now been overturned. But he has the detail, he sticks fairly close to the primary sources and most importantly, the man could write. Write in a way that I find it hard to put the book down.

Combine that with the need for a national narrative and it is no wonder that Giesebrecht’s history of the  Ottonians, Salians and Staufer captured the imagination of the nation.

Not just that, but the proper investigation of the medieval history triggered the famous Historian’s debate of 1859-1862, which was not just a debate about historical events, but also a debate about whether Germany should be a Prussian led “smaller Germany” or an Austrian-led “Larger Germany”.

We discussed that in episode 20 already and after several attempts to write it up again in a different way, I concluded the way I laid it out then is still the best. So, I will largely repeat wat I said then:

In the Prussian corner we have Heinrich von Sybel (1817-1895). An accomplished historian and, like Giesebrecht, trained by the godfather of the modern science of history, Leopold von Ranke. He argued that Henry the Fowler was the greatest Ottonian ruler since he focused on unifying the German stems, defending the realm against the Magyars, and expanding eastwards. Amongst the later rulers he liked Henry II and Lothar III, but his biggest hero was Henry the Lion who drove the Eastward expansion into Pomerania. On the other hand, he thought Otto the Great was misguided and did terrible harm to Germany by going after the imperial crown. The entanglement in Italy forced him and his successors to waste blood and treasure in fruitless fights with the Italian states and most of all, the papacy. Taking the eye off the ball in Germany allowed the local princes to expand their power which ultimately led to the collapse of central authority in Germany and all the misery ever since. His bottom line was that Germany should focus on inner unity and coherence and avoid entanglement with foreigners in general and Roman Catholics in particular. Barbarossa focus on Italy was in his eyes the most fatal of mistakes.

In the Austrian corner we have Johann von Ficker (1826-1902), unfortunate name but also a gifted writer. He argued that the imperial project of Otto the Great and Otto III was neither a true empire nor a nation state but an ambitious and benevolent attempt to bring together the members of multiple nations under one roof. It was no coincidence that this model of the reign of Otto the Great looked a lot like the then Austrian empire which comprised many nations including Hungarians, Czech, Poles, Croats, Slovacs, Slovenians and many more who allegedly lived happily under Emperor Franz Joseph’s benevolent rule. Otto the Great and Barbarossa were his heroes.

Though v. Sybel took the Prussian in inverted commas position, the freshly made Kaiser Wilhelm I influenced by his son did not go along. Instead, they went for some sort of pick’n mix that they then consolidated in the next iteration of mythical Barbarossa.

They took a bit of Doryen’s notion of Barbarossa as an anticlerical ruler who consolidated the empire after a period of weakness inflicted by foreign powers. They took v. Sybels’s notion that the Italian entanglement was the source of all evil. Barbarossa, so the story goes, wanted to go east but was held back by the nasty popes and treacherous princes. And they took a bit of v. Ficker when they emphasised the universal nature of Barbarossa’s title as emperor.

That way they could draw a direct line from the “first” empire, the Holy Roman empire of Barbarossa to the “Second” empire that of the Hohenzollern, of Wilhelm I, Barbablanca. This happened quite quickly. When Wilhelm I addressed the Reichstag on March 21st, 1871, two months after the formal creation of the Kaiserreich on January 18th, the emperor was sitting on a bronze throne that had been made for emperor Henry IV around 1075 and had stood in Goslar for centuries.

Now the weirdness factor is turned up to 11. Bismarck sends out an expedition to Tyre to find the bones of Barbarossa. The plan is to bury them in Cologne cathedral, which had been left half finished since 1473. Though plans had been under way to complete the works, these accelerated after 1871 and in the midst of the Kulturkampf the protestant state of Prussia funded the completion of a catholic cathedral to house the bones of an emperor who would have much preferred to be buried in the traditional mausoleum of his ancestors, the cathedral of Speyer.

Next step was the rebuilding of the Pfalz in Goslar, a building that had been in a desolate state. Wilhelm I began its renovation in 1866 and by 1876 the ministry of culture asked for proposals to decorate the main hall. The project was won by Hermann Wislicenus, a professor at the academy of fine art in Dusseldorf. He and his assistants will spend the next 20 years producing a total of 53 paintings.

I have unfortunately not seen it myself, but it is high up on my list of places to visit because it sounds proper mad.

The fresco cycle starts off with Sleeping Beaty as a personification of Germany on one wall and emperor Wilhem on the opposite side as the prince who awakens her. Below Wilhelm is Barbarossa’s awakening, who, sword in hand, looks towards the great central painting of the foundation of the Second Empire.

And Barbarossa appears several more times, once kneeling before Henry the Lion in 1176 which symbolises the treachery by the princes that led to the downfall of imperial power. Opposite it is a picture showing Henry the Lion kneeling before Barbarossa at the diet of Erfurt in 1181 interpreted at the time as Barbarossa’s great achievement but as we now know his political low point.

Next, he appears at Besancon, rejecting the demands of pope Hadrian IV to be his vassal. This symbolises, together with a picture showing a caged pope Gregory VI being taken into exile across the alps by Henry III the firm rejection of papal interference in German affairs. And then finally he has a great stage appearance in a picture showing his last battle against the Turkish sultan at Konya. What that is to symbolise is unclear, maybe it was simply the only major open battle he had won. Pushing siege engines with hostages chained to the front just does not have the same vibe.

It all culminates in a huge allegorical image that shows the creation of the Second Empire. Wilhelm I is shown of horseback, king Ludwig II of Bavaria hands him the crown, something that never happened, for once because there was no crown and for seconds because Ludwig II had accepted a busload of cash for not opposing the creation of the empire but did not think that was enough for him to leave his kitsch castles in Herrenchiemsee, Linderhof or Neuschwanstein he built with that cash.

Then you have the people who were in fact involved in the real word creation of the empire. There are the other princes nodding approvingly, Otto von Bismarck swinging a distinctly unimpressive hammer onto the foundation stone and Field Marshalls Moltke and Roon looking mighty pleased with themselves.

They share their space with some allegorical figures. Alsace and Lorraine personified as maidens enthralled by Wilhelm’s beard and up in the sky are the Queen Louise holding the medieval imperial crown above her son’s head whilst Barbarossa as a godlike figure up in the heavens points at the events below as if to give its blessing.

That is pretty weirs as is. But for anyone who did not get the message, there are two equestrian statues outside the rebuild palace featuring Frederick I, Barbarossa and Wilhelm I, Barbablanca. The link between first and second empire is made stone and bronze.

Fun fact, once the fresco cycle was completed the new emperor Wilhelm II, Kaiser Bill to you and me, did not like it much. Neither he nor any other member of the imperial family went to the grand opening.

Kaiser Bill objected to the concept that the second empire was described as a culmination of German rather than Prussian history and just generally the notion that anyone else, other than his grandfather had anything to do with the success of 1871. In particular not Bismarck who he had just fired.

To ensure that the new imperial ideology was made into an even more impressive monumnet, Kaiser Bill got closely involved with the other, even more astounding monument to Barbarossa, the Kyffhaeser memorial.

Though this was built over the mountain in which the old emperor allegedly slept, it was designed and built not as a memorial to him, but to glorify the new emperor, Wilhelm I. And only Wilhelm I – nobody else.

The monument had been proposed and financed by the army veteran’s association. It is placed on the site of the medieval castle of the Kyffhaeser which dates back to 1118 and stretched 600m along the ridge of the mountain. The largest medieval structure left was the so-called tower of Barbarossa at one end.

The monument was built at the other end. It is 81 m tall and 130m wide, carved partially into the mountainside and visible for miles around. Its main feature is a 9.7m tall statue of emperor Wilhelm I as its focal point accompanied by personifications of war and history.  Behind the statue rises a 54m tall tower topped by the non-existent crown of the Second empire.

Barbarossa is there. They couldn’t really ditch him completely. But he is down at the base of the tower, his statue looking somewhat unfinished mainly for financial reasons. He is just about to stir, though he is no longer needed as Wilhelm had done the deed he never got round to. Kaiser Bill it seems had no need for medieval relics.

And he did not have much need for anyone else who could detract from his grandpa’s achievements.  When the veteran’s association who funded the whole enterprise suggested to add some canons and military standards to the complex he rejected it. Same goes for statues of the main architects of the new Reich, say Bismarck, Moltke at a minimum, maybe Scharnhort? No, nobody. Just grandpa. This time it was Bismarck who refused to come to the great opening.

After the fall of the monarchy in 1918 the right wind nationalists evoked the “spirit of the Kyffhaeser”, an idea of rebuilding the nation from its ruin, preferably by some great man.

Hitler and the Nazis appropriated not just the Kyffhaeser but most of German history, including Barbarossa and twisted it to their needs.

The concept of a Third Reich is a natural next step after Barbarossa’s First Reich and Wilhelm I’s Second Reich. And the notion of Reich that lasts a Thousand years goes straight back to the prophecy of the Last Emperor.

When you put Barbarossa into Google search, all but one reference is for Operation Barbarossa, the failed invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Why it was called Barbarossa is curious. The Ideological underpinning of the attack was to expand east and conquer “Lebensraum” for the Aryan race.

Barbarossa pursued many political initiatives, executed U-turns and reoriented when necessary. One thing he never showed much interest in was the eastern expansion of the empire. That was the great ambition of Henry the Lion. When the name of Henry the Lion was proposed as the codename for the operation, apparently Hitler refused. He insisted to go in the name of an emperor instead of a duke because it sounded better.

Immediately after the war Barbarossa is shapeshifting again.

Friedrich Heer, an Austrian writer and intellectual likened Barbarossa’s policies in Italy to Hitler’s activities in occupied Europe. He described the years between 1157 and 1167 in Italy as a lordship of horror that Germans had imposed on Italian cities. He blames all that on Rainald von Dassel, the chancellor of Barbarossa. After von Dassel’s death so he thought, Barbarossa reverted back to be a realistic medieval monarch which resulted in a great flowering of art and culture. Barbarossa as a part time Hitler.

But come the cold war and the reintegration of West Germany into the European nations, Barbarossa is reinterpreted again. Now not as an autocrat seeking world domination, but as a ruler who maintained close and friendly relationships with the kings of England and France. A primus inter pares more like.

The disastrous experience with a unified Germany led to a re-evaluation of the political fragmentation of the country and hence the role of the princes in the Middle Ages. Suddenly they are no longer the villains but the starting point of the varied and decentralised German culture, its plethora of small and large cities housing artists, writers, composers and playwrights. Barbarossa’s leniency towards the centrifugal powers had made Goethe and schiller in Weimar a possibility.

In 1977 the great Staufer exhibition that I mentioned at the very beginning of this series was staged in Stuttgart and turned out to be an unexpected success. It was meant not to celebrate the national importance of the Hohenstaufen, but their roots in the ancient duchy of Swabia, roughly equivalent to the newly created state of Baden-Württemberg.

Ministerpresident Filbinger of Baden Württemberg proclaimed that the objective of the Hohenstaufen had been a humane one. They never intended to establish an autocratic state but aimed to provide a universal order of law and peace. Protection of the rights of the individual were at the heart of their policies. Something to be proud of in German history as a counterpoint to the Nazi horrors. And in a typical German twist, Filbinger had to resign a year later having been accused of having pushed for the death penalty in a case of desertion when he was a public prosecutor in the Navy during the war. His guilt is still in dispute.

Hans Filbinger

Whilst the Western Germans were flailing about trying to get to grips with their former national symbol, so did the East Germans. Initially the communists wanted to blow up the Kyffhaeser memorial as a symbol of militarism. But the soviets objected.

Let’s go to the last twist, the architect Bruno Schmitz who designed the Kyffhaeser also built the even larger memorial of the battle of nations near Leipzig (the Volkerschlachtdenkmal), the monument to Wilhelm I and Herman the German in the Teutoburg Forest as well as the Deutsche Eck in Koblenz. Alongside this top trumps of German nationalism, he also designed the similarly sized memorial for the Sailors and Soldiers in Indianapolis, commemorating American soldiers who had died for freedom and democracy. The difference in ideology did not translate into a material difference in design.

The debate about the role of Barbarossa as a national symbol is still ongoing. Who knows what mythical shape he is going to take from here. In 2002 the State of Baden Württemberg erected a stele on the Hohenstaufen, the initial home of the dynasty. Its inscription reads:

Hohenstaufen

A Mountain

A Castle

A Dynasty

An Epoch

A Myth

And with that we put Barbarossa to bed. The next few episodes will attempt to paint a picture of Germany in around 1190, similarly to what we did about Germany in the year 1000. I have to ask for a bit of patience. Summer holidays are coming up and airlines and ferry companies have little respect for podcast schedules. I will try to stick to the Thursday morning release but please do not be upset if you sometimes find an episode is later than usual or if there is a longer gap between them.

Before I go, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patron.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to start with me endorsing mattresses or meal kits. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. As always, all the links are in the show notes. 

The Death of Emperor Frederick I Barbarossa

This week, after 15 episodes we will finally leave the emperor Barbarossa behind, though it is almost impossible to ever get away from him. No other medieval ruler is still so present in the national psyche, not as the man he was but as the myth he was turned into. So today we say goodbye to the man and next time we will take a look at the myth. 

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 65 – The Third Crusade 

This week, after 15 episodes we will finally leave the emperor Barbarossa behind, though it is almost impossible to ever get away from him. No other medieval ruler is still so present in the national psyche, not as the man he was but as the myth he was turned into. So today we say goodbye to the man and next time we will take a look at the myth. 

Quick apology, I was supposed to put up a page for the last episode with transcripts, maps and images. This has unfortunately not yet happened. The same goes for many other things I wanted to do but have not. This page as well as the one accompanying this episode should be up shortly after it is released, as usual under histioryofthegermans/65-2.  

But before we start as always, a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. Thanks a lot, to James and the extraordinarily generous Michael who have already signed up. 

As we heard last week Barbarossa is going on crusade, not just as another ruler, but as the emperor to fulfil the last and final act of his career, free Jerusalem from the yoke of Saladin and possibly the last and final act that brings about 1000 years of bliss by putting down his crown in the Church of the Holy sepulchre, fulfilling an ancient prophecy. 

This all sounds a bit bonkers and probably is. But despite its spiritual objectives, Barbarossa went about organising this crusade with his usual rationality and thoroughness.  

It was not his first rodeo. Barbarossa had been on crusade before, 30 years earlier in the ill-fated crusade of his uncle, king Konrad III. And he remembered the lessons learned. 

The first and most crucial one was that participation of unarmed and poor pilgrims had to be avoided at all costs. These men and women had slowed down the progress through the Balkans in 1147, had consumed much of the scarce water and food and were responsible for the majority of the altercations with the local populace. And, most crucially, they were totally useless on the battlefield. He did get support in his attempt to hold back the pilgrims from the pope himself who ordered that only well-equipped and well-funded soldiers should get the absolution that come with a crusade.   

The second crucial point was discipline. Konrad found himself in all sorts of difficulties with local potentates because order in the army was difficult to enforce. Barbarossa was not willing to allow any distractions of that kind. He instated draconian punishments for stealing and plundering ranging from cutting off hands to execution. And he was not shy in following through. He even executed noblemen who had not stuck by the rules. 

In terms of route, there are now two well established ways to get to the Holy Land. One is via Italy. Crusaders would gather at one of the great maritime republics, Genoa, Pisa or Venice and board huge galleys that could take them and their horses and armour across to the crusader harbours in Acre, Tyre or Tripoli. These journeys were perilous and very, very expensive but much quicker. They could also rely on a fully operational supply chain that offered armour, weapons and horses from their warehouses in Italy, the harbours along the route and in the Holy Land itself. The great republics were able to provide financing, either as credit or by money transfer from back home.  

The cost were initially very high because the galleys returned mostly empty. The few Crusaders who survived long enough to book a return passage would leave their  horses behind and bring souvenirs along. One popular souvenir was earth from Mount Golgatha which is assumed to be where the final judgement would start and hence those buried there would be the first to be sent to paradise. The Camposanto in Pisa was covered with earth of Golgatha brought back on crusader galleys because, in the usual one-upmanship of Italian communes, the Pisans wanted to be the first through the gate. 

This route was however not the one Barbarossa chose. He decided to take the longer and even more dangerous land-route through Hungary, Byzantium and Turkish Anatolia. Why he did that is not recorded. It may be for economic reasons, by now Germany had already fallen behind France and England in terms of wealth. It could be because he wanted to avoid getting into a competition with Richard Lionheart and Phillippe Auguste of France over scarce shipping capacity. Or he may have taken advice from his cousin Henry the Lion who had been to Jerusalem in 1172 and had nearly drowned twice on the way down so that he chose the land route on the way back. 

Barbarossa set the date of departure for May 11, 1189. He left his realm in reasonable order. His son, King Henry VI was 24 which made him an old hand as a medieval ruler. He had run several military campaigns and been involved in all his father’s major decisions over the last decade. As for Henry the Lion, despite the formal reconciliation between him and his adversaries in Saxony, staying in Germany was not an option. Henry was given the choice of joining the crusade or going into exile in England for the duration. He chose England. 

The army that left Regensburg in the early summer of 1189 was one of the largest and best equipped Barbarossa had ever commanded. About 3,000 knights and 12,000 well-armed foot soldiers. His son Frederick VI, duke of Swabia was the second in command. As per normal, a gaggle of bishops came along, though no archbishop. Amongst temporal lords the duke of Bohemia, Duke Berthold of Andechs, the margrave of Baden and another roughly 30 counts and 25 noble knights had joined.  

The other group that will play an important role on the crusade and even more so in later Hohenstaufen history were the Ministeriales. Just to recap, a Ministeriale is a serf-knight. He is not a free man but bound to his master by a servile relationship, unable to own land outright and to shift allegiance. Ministeriales receive the same military training as knights and are given fiefs to sustain them.  Ministeriales have been around for over a 100 years by now and rules have softened. Many Ministeriales are able to pass their position onto their sons. These sons often marry into the aristocracy or daughters of other Ministeriales creating over time dynastic complexes that rival free knights and sometimes counts. And they rise to prominence at court. Two of those, Heinrich von Kalden and Markward von Annweiler serve in imperial court roles and are close advisers. They will later be significant supporters of his son Henry VI.  

The first leg of the journey involved crossing Hungary. This went very smoothly. King Bela of Hungary had offered to support the crusaders with food, drink and transport. The emperor, his entourage and the baggage train travelled by boat along the Danube whilst the army followed along on foot.  

At Belgrade the crusaders entered Byzantine territory. From here the journey had to continue on foot. Though the Danube flows down to the Black Sea, shipping ends beyond Belgrade because of the Iron Gates, a section of fast flowing canyons that weren’t navigable for medieval vessels.  

King Bela took his leave and his boats home. Provisions were loaded onto carts and the host followed the smaller great Morava river. The Byzantine governor of the province greeted the emperor and his magnates with all due honours. Barbarossa had agreed free passage with the Byzantine empire a year earlier and John Dukes, one of the leading figures at court in Constantinople had sworn to provide supplies, guides and safety. When he got to the border Barbarossa had expected to find a letter from the Emperor Issac II Angelos welcoming him to his lands, similar to the letter Konrad III had received at that point in 1147. But there was no letter. There was also no escort and were no guides. The Basileus he was told was in campaign in Asia Minor and hence not yet aware of his coming which explains the lack of letter of welcome. 

What had happened? Before we go into the events of 1189, we have to go back to 1180. The emperor Manuel, the one who had featured so regularly in previous episodes had died aged 61 after 37 years on the throne. His reign was already one of near constant crisis as Byzantium had to fight against Hungarians and Serbs on the Balkans, had fallen out with the maritime republics, in particular Venice and tried to wrestle Anatolia back from the Turks and the Crusaders. The great miracle of his reign was that it held together for so long. It was only in 1176 that he suffered a serious defeat at Myriokephalon against the Turks under Kilij Arslan II.  

Upon his death his wife, Maria of Antioch reigned as regent for her 12-year-old son Alexios II Komnenos.  Maria was not only renowned for her beauty, she was also the daughter of a crusader and supported the Italian merchants in Constantinople. Her opposition was led by her stepdaughter, also Maria and Manuel’s cousin Andronicus Komnenos, who preferred a harsher treatment of the Latins, even though she herself was married to a Latin crusader. The conflict exploded onto the streets and resulted in a massacre of the Pisan and Genoese merchants. The Venetians had already been expelled by Manuel. Maria of Antioch was toppled. The rebels made Alexios II sign his mother’s death warrant before the boy himself was secretly murdered.  

Maria of Antioch

Andronicus’ tried to bring order to the fraying empire, but his regime was considered very harsh. In particular the aristocrats he tried to bring in line opposed him.  His regime grew violent and as chaos set in, King William II of Sicily invaded Greece. William II took Durazza, todays Durres in Albania and sacked Thessaloniki. When he mustered to march his troops towards Constantinople, the population revolted and placed Isaac II, Angelos on the throne. Andronicus was handed to the mob who tortured him for three days before he was hung by his feet in the Hippodrome.    

Emperor Andronikos

Isaac’s regime was initially more stable than Andronicus. He raised an army and sent William II of Sicily packing in 1186. He pacified the borders through marriage alliances. He himself married the daughter of the King of Hungary one of Byzantine’s greatest foes and his niece was given to the leader of the Serbs who had wriggled out of imperial overlordship and expanded. 

Isaac II Angelos

But by 1189 when Barbarossa demanded free passage, things had turned for the worse. The Bulgarians had rebelled against higher taxes and established what is called the Second Bulgarian empire. The general he had sent to put down the revolt had turned his weapons against his master and had marched against Constantinople. The Serbs had also established a pretty much autonomous state. For all intents and purposes, the hold of the Byzantine Empire on the Balkans was fragile.  

Before he had set off, Barbarossa had sent envoys to Isaac II Angelos to confirm the right to free passage and access to supplies through regular markets. He assured him of his peaceful intentions and sole desire to reach Jerusalem. 

However, Isaac II did not get this warm and cosy feeling. Barbarossa was a crusader given previous experiences, a threat. He was also in a close marriage alliance with William of Sicily who had just tried to take Constantinople. The empire was allied with Pisa and Genoa whose citizens had only recently have their limbs torn apart by the mob in his capital. He might even have heard about these age-old diplomatic links to the Seldjuc Turks to his south.  

To say the least, Isaac did not like the idea of a massive Latin army going through his territory. He knew that he did not have the resources to stop Barbarossa and that his other ally, the King of Hungary, would not be willing to prevent a crusade. So, he went out for the full Monty.  

He made an alliance with Saladin, yes, Saladin, the man who had taken Jerusalem from the Christians. Isaac allowed public prayers to be said for the Abasid Caliph in the mosque of Constantinople.  

But where he went completely overboard was when Isaac imprisoned Barbarossa’s envoys, the bishop of Munster and the count of Nassau. The two envoys had their possessions taken and handed over to Saladin’s representatives who taunted the helpless Germans. 

Barbarossa up in Brabitschewo did not know what had happened to his emissaries, but the absence of letters from them made him suspicious. That suspicion grew as he received false intelligence from the governors’ aides.  

After a week of waiting for a more helpful response, the army set off down towards Sofia. What awaited them was the so-called forest of the Bulgars, which is to confuse everyone actually in Serbia. The journey was perilous and the army was constantly attacked by bandits. They finally arrived in Nis, formerly a centre of Byzantine power, but now half destroyed after it had been taken by the Serbs. The Serbs had become a semi-independent polity under their leader Stephan Nemanja. 

The Serbs gave a Barbarossa a splendid reception. They gave the crusaders wine, flour, sheep and cattle as well six extremely useful seals to take along from here. Beyond hard to maintain aquatic animals, they also offered him an alliance that would encompass the recently independent empire of the Bulgars. All they asked was that the emperor would enfeoff them with the lands they already held.  

Tempting as that may have been, Barbarossa refused. Awarding their land to the rebels would have meant war with Constantinople. His objective was however Jerusalem, and he did not want to make the crusade dependent upon being able to overturn the regime of Isaac. 

The other people present in Nis was a delegation from Isaac who saw the emperor drinking and joking with the Serb rulers and – though Barbarossa assured them he would not grant them what they wanted – felt uneasy. They believed that some sort of under the table arrangement had been made to the detriment to Isaac, who quite frankly hadn’t expected anything less.  

The level of mutual suspicion deepened when the Byzantines gathered troops on the passes leading to Sofia whilst the Germans were now given Serbian escorts to protect against the bandits. Sometimes they got through and sometimes the bandits got caught. Bishop Diepold of Passau captured 24 attackers and had them dragged into the camp at the tails of their horses. They admitted to be in the pay of the Byzantine emperor and were hanged by their feet “like wolves” as the chroniclers said. 

When they finally got to Sofia the great reception by senior Byzantine nobles and the promised supplies weren’t there. The city was almost empty, its citizens had fled. There was no food. 

At that point it was clear that emperor Isaac wanted them dead. Reports came that the bodies of crusaders who had died and had been buried in the forest of the Bulgars had been dug up and hung from the trees along the road.  

It nearly came to a battle with regular Byzantine troops a pass called Trajan’s gate. 500 Byzantines had fortified the position and awaited the army. However, as they saw the size of the crusader throng, they fled, leaving the road open to Philippopolis, modern day Plovdiv in Bulgaria. Again, like in Sofia the city is empty of inhabitants but there is some food. 

Theatre in Plovdiv

Envoys from Isaac II arrive with a letter from the emperor. I am sure as usual written in gold on purple paper the letter contains a long list of complaints against Barbarossa who he accuses of wanting to conquer Constantinople and make his son Frederick emperor. His dealings with the Serbs are suspicious. Bottom line is that he would allow the “king of the Germans” to cross at the Hellespont only if he receives hostages of his choosing.  

It is here at the latest that Barbarossa hears about the treatment of his ambassadors at the court of Isaac II. This humiliation of the men travelling under the imperial banner was an insult, not just to Barbarossa and the empire but to the crusade in general and thereby to the whole of Latin Christendom.  

In spite of this double insult, Barbarossa retains his cool. He declares that he would not negotiate until his ambassadors are returned to him safe and sound, their losses compensated and the behaviour explained. Without a valid peace, this is now war. 

The ban on plundering and murdering of the local population is lifted. The army will spend the next 11 weeks in Philippopolis devastating Byzantine lands. This is almost as long as it had taken them to get to where they are. By the end they will control most territory north of Constantinople. 

But that wasn’t why they came. They really wanted to go to Jerusalem. To get there you had to cross the Hellespont. And that meant you needed ships. Not only that, you also needed to be sure the army would not be attacked when it was most vulnerable during the crossing. Given how deteriorated the relationship between Isaac and Barbarossa was, there was no way the Germans would go across without some serious assurances, say some very senior hostages.  

The French knights under Lous VII had the same problem in 1147 and they had come to the same conclusion. The only way to force the Vasilev was by threatening to take Constantinople. And that is exactly what Barbarossa did, thereby proving all of Isaac’s suspicions.  

The war of words escalated once Isaac had sent the bishop of Munster and the count of Nassau who he had held in captivity back. Finally, the court hears from their own mouths how they have been treated. The whole army roars in anger when they hear the imperial representatives were kept in confinement with meagre rations and all their possessions taken from them. The diplomatic exchanges are now bordering on rudeness. Barbarossa calls the Basileos a mere King of the Greeks and points out sarcastically that he would not trust any oath he swears. Isaac responds with equally rude letters.  The patriarch in Constantinople offers absolution to any Greek who kills a crusader. Accusations and counteraccusations run around their respective cultural zones. The western world hears theories that Isaac II has formed a permanent alliance with Saladin to expel the crusaders for good, has allowed Friday prayers in his capital and will ultimately convert to Islam. Saladin, they say, have had sent the Byzantines 25 tons of poisoned fruit and 50 tons of poisoned flour to kill crusaders. All this fuels the notion of Byzantium as a duplicitous people in hock with the Muslims and out to destroy Outre-mer. 

Plans are now afoot to take the city of Constantinople itself. Barbarossa writes to his son to hire a fleet of warships from Pisa and Genoa needed to take the great city on the Bosporus. His army is now regularly engaged in fighting with Byzantine troop contingents and one encounter could almost be described as a battle. Barbarosa moves his main forces to Adrianople, closer to the Bosporus.  The zsar of the Bulgars offers him thousands of archers for a siege of Constantinople. 

It is not farfetched to believe that if the Pisan and Genoese fleets had made it to Constantinople, the city would have been taken, not by the Venetians and French in 1204 but by the Pisans, Genoese and Germans in 1189. Can you imagine the Horses of St. Marks standing next to the leaning tower of Pisa or even weirder, on the façade of Speyer cathedral?  

But it did not happen, because Isaac II finally caved. He wrote to Barbarossa in Adrianbople, now calling him the Emperor of Ancient Rome, to say that he would provide ships to cross the Hellespont and offered him a list of hostages. Barbarossa agrees, but when Isaac makes the agreement public, the mob rejects it and so it is not signed. Barbarossa’s troops now move even closer to the city, cutting it off from vital food supplies.  

Another envoy from Isaac arrives, who now senses that the end is nigh if he does not give in. he promises everything, ships to be put under Barbarossa’s command, hostages, a market to buy provisions at fair prices, the Byzantine army moved four days march away from the point of embarkation, restitution of the envoys possessions etc., etc. pp. 500 citizens of Constantionople are made to swear by the agreement before Markward of Annweiler.  

On March 1st, 1190 does the army finally march towards the Hellespont, having lost almost half a year in ultimately unnecessary fighting with Isaac II. Barbarossa’s timing is now way off. In his initial plan he would by now be in Jerusalem campaigning against the infidels. Instead, by April do they reach Philadelphia, the last bit of fully Byzantine controlled territory in Anatolia. From here it is a march through 400km of territory devastated and depopulated by perennial war between Turks and Byzantium.   

The next waypoint is Iconium, modern Konya, the capital of sultan Kilij Arslan II. Barbarossa had made an agreement with him too that allowed for free passage. Kilij Arslan was in principle supportive of the crusaders as they kept Saladin in check who he feared may go after him next. 

So far so good, but what Barbarossa had not realised is that Kilij Arslan II had limited control over what happened on the territory he formally was in charge of. The local turkmen tribes did pretty much what they liked and his sons of which he had many, had wrestled power away from daddy creating their own little fiefdom. The nice piece of parchment from Kilij Arslan II guaranteeing protection from attack was worth precisely nothing. 

The other problem was that they had lost far too much time. The last thing an army of Northern European wants to do is march through the boiling summer heat of Anatolia. And that is exactly what happened. Not only that, because they were almost constantly under attack, they wore their armour all the time. Food was now extremely scarce and knights began eating their horses. 

As they marched, they went from one place Christians had been defeated to the next. Doryleum, where Konrad III’s endeavour had perished, Myriokephalon where Manuel was defeated and so on. The roads were treacherous, and horses and provisions fell into crags and canyons. Whenever they encountered a settlement, the crusaders took revenge by murdering the women and children of their tormentors.  

Finally, the Seldjuc Turks showed their true colours. Near Konya they set themselves up for battle. The crusaders worn down by their ordeal, dirty, their armour rusty and short of food, water and horses looked like easy prey.  

On the eve of battle Count Ludwig of Helfenstain bolstered the morale of the crusaders when he declare he had seen  Saint George in his shimmering coat riding his white horse in the sky before the army in his dreams.  

The German army was lined up in a triangular formation. The top was held by the bishops of Wurzburg and Munster, the left flank by Frederick of Swabia and the right flank by the emperor himself. In the centre were the footsoldiers, defending the unarmed civilians and the baggage train. 

The Turks saw the imperial standard and went straight for it. Frederick sent some of his knights to support his father. Since the terrain was for once favourable to the Latins, the knights could fight in their tight formation and launch their thunderous charges. The Turks in light armour had nothing to put against it. And so, against all odds, the crusaders defeated the Turks. 

A few days later they reached the city of Konya. There they camped in the gardens of the sultan outside the walls where there was water and grazing in abundance.  The Turkish army lay outside the city on a crescent shape around the crusader camp. The next morning the army was divided in two parts. One was to fight the Turkish cavalry outside the walls whilst the other was to break into the city.  

That sounds like utter madness and probably was. Besieging a city whilst being attacked in the rear is a challenge at the best of times, but without siege engines and after 400 km march through heat and constant attacks is pretty much hopeless. 

But then luck came to the rescue. Whilst all this went on, both sides were still negotiating. And at some point the old Sultan came out on of the city gates, seemingly willing to hand back a prisoner they had made before. Frederick of Swabia did not quite realise what was going on, aparty from the gate being opened and only a small contingent coming out. He took his half of the army and ran up against the sultan who had turned tail, leading the crusaders into the city. 

The usual sacking and pillaging followed. The other half of the army never had to engage the Turks who had encircled them. The next day the crusaders took away 100,000 mark of silver, provisions to last them for weeks and 6000 horses and mules to replace those they had lost en route. The sultan signed a peace deal and provided noble hostages that guaranteed free passage for the remaining leg of the journey in their lands. 

This was the last battle Barbarossa would ever fight.  

They left Konya a day later as the smell of decaying flesh made staying impossible. They rested for a week in a camp a few miles away, repairing their equipment and enjoying the abundance of food and drink. 

Four days later they reached the border with Armenia at Laranda. The ruler of Armenia, Leon II had been in correspondence with Barbarossa for a long time. Leon II would like to be elevated to King of Armenia, an honour only an emperor can bestow. Because Leon II was in constant conflict with Byzantium, Barbarossa was his man.    

All was set up for such a coronation. The bishop of Wuerzburg had brought the ordo for a coronation under the Latin rites and Leon II had offered to become an imperial vassal. Veen more surprising, this agreement was indeed serious, unlike the promises of the Byzantines and Turks. The army was now guided by local scouts and there were no more attacks.  

The route led along terraces overlooking the river Saleph. It was extremely hot. As there was no longer any concerns about attacks, the strict marching order dissolved. Everyone just shlepped along in broadly the same direction desperately looking for shade of relief from the heat. 

On June 10th the Armenian guide showed Barbarossa and his entourage a path that led down to the river.  The path was steep, and they had to go on foot. They are now just 8km from the capital of the ruler of Armenia. What exactly happened on the shore of this river we will never know.  

My favourite version is that Barbarossa crossed the river, and now in the shade, sat down for lunch. He would be down in the presence of his new vassal by evening and so decided to have a bath, wash off the dust of the long journey. He was 67 years old, but he had spent his entire life on horseback. He was definitely fitter than I ever was. He was a good swimmer and had enjoyed the occasional swim in the Adriatic with his best friend Otto von Wittelsbach.  

The water of the Saleph is icy cold and it may be that the combination of heat and cold had brought on a sudden heart attack. Or he may have slipped and was dragged along in the water and drowned. When his men realised what had happened, they jumped after him but could only drag him out dead. 

The army is in shock. The emperor who was to go to Jerusalem and bring about 1000 years where Satan would be in chains was dead. The whole endeavour, all the pain and suffering was for nought. More than that 

The fact that the emperor had not had a good death, had not been able to  confess before he died and had not been given the last rites was an indication that the whole enterprise displeased God. 

Almost immediately the great nobles set off for home.  

Barbarossa’s body was brought to Seleucia and embalmed. The crusaders mourned him for four days.  

His intestines were removed and buried in the cathedral of Tarsus, home of the Apostle Paul. Duke Frederick took over as leader of what was left of the crusade. They took the body with them to Antioch. There the flesh was cooked off the bones and buried in the cathedral of St Peter.  

The actual bones remained with the crusaders who journeyed to Tyre, seemingly with the idea of burying them in Jerusalem. As the third crusade never took Jerusalem, the bones never got there. Where they ended up, nobody knows. Many believe he was finally buried in the cathedral of Tyre or maybe Akkon.  

Wild stories began circulating as early as the 13th century that he had not died at all. The mythical prester John who dwelled in the far east had given him a stone that made him invisible and he is still walking amongst us. By the 19th century the tale had turned towards the Kyffhauser mountain, 3,400km from Tyre. And there he still sleeps under that Wilhelmine monstrosity, only to rise when Germany needs him. 

The myth of Barbarossa is for next time. It will unfortunately not be next week. I have been on the trot for 22 episodes, and I need a break. So, the next episode will be on July 7th. Once we covered the myth I was thinking of doing a few episodes about Germany in the year 1200. It has been a while since we have taken a look at how people lived, their customs, laws and behaviours. A lot has changed since the year 1000. I hope you like the idea. 

Before I go, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patron.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to start with me endorsing mattresses or meal kits. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. As always, all the links are in the show notes.   

Joachim of Fiore’s Prophecies about the Emperor and Thousand Years of Bliss

Many of Barbarossa’s predecessors tried to wiggle out of the link of theoir legityimacy to the papal coronation, but few were as persistent as Barbarossa. His first attempt at redefining the relationship between pope and empire had ended in his prostration before Alexander III in Venice.

But he wasn’t done. This week we will discuss how he attempts to rebuild a new ideological underpinning of his role, how that leads to conflict with the popes and how he gets a chance to turn the mythmaking up to 11.

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans, Episode 64: The Heirs of Troy.

A small piece of housekeeping first. Last week I erroneously suggested that Leonardo’s Last supper was in the church of St. Ambrogio in Milan. As it happens, it is not. Leonardo’s last Supper is in the refectory of the Dominican Convent of Santa Maria della Grazie. When I last went to see it, I had also visited the church of St. Ambrogio nearby and in my scrambled memory the two buildings became one. Must be one of the seven signs of ageing, most of which I have forgotten. In case you have spent the last week wondering aimlessly around the St. Ambrogio looking for something that was not there, I apologise. Thank you @Trailoftears on Reddit for pointing this out.

Santa Maria della Grazie – Milan

Well and now we go to the year 750 AD. Pepin the Short, mayor of the palace sent an ambassador to pope Zachary. Pepin held all the power in the Merovingian realm, but he was not king. The king was Childeric III. Childeric was a “roi fainéant” a king who did not do anything apart from being wheeled out once a year on an ox cart. The real rulers were the mayors of the palace. And in 750, that was Pepin the short.

Other than his father Charles Martel, Pepin found this lack of royal title unbearable. He wanted to be king, really, really wanted to be king. But to be king in the realm that the legendary Clovis had built you had to be a descendent of Clovis and his grandfather, the legendary sea monster Merovech. Pepin was no such thing and could hence not be king under Merovingian rules.

If you do not like the rules you live under and you have absolute power, what do you do, you change the rules and to hell with the consequences. Pepin the Short ambassadors to Pope Zachary asked the pontiff: “Is it wise to have kings who hold no power of control?”. Pope Zachary was smart enough to know what the real question was and – since he needed Pepin’s help in Italy wrote back that: “It is better to have a king able to govern. By my apostolic authority I bid that you be crowned King of the Franks.” 

With that Childeric III was shorn of his auburn locks and ended up in a monastery, Pepin ended up on the throne of the Frankish kingdom and the German emperors ended up in a mess.  

Pepin’s letter created a precedent. Pepin’s son Charlemagne reenforced it when he accepted the imperial crown from Pope Leo III in Rome. Einhard, the Imperial propagandist tried to minimise the damage by claiming the crown was put on the emperor’s head without his consent. When the empire was re-founded by Otto the Great in 962, again the pope put the crown on his head. And again, Otto’s chronicler Widukind does not even mention the imperial coronation. He tells the story that the soldiers had hailed the Saxon king as emperor on the field of the battle of the Lechfeld, like they did it in ancient Rome.

Coronation of Charlemagne

But imperial twisting of history did not stick. Pepin, Charlemagne and Otto the Great had all received their crowns from the pope. Once the popes had declared they had apostolic authority to appoint and depose kings and emperors they will not let go of it. For centuries German emperors trekked across the Alps to finally receive the elevation they desired. Whether they saw any point in it is not recorded, but it had become non-optional by the 12th century. If you wanted to be emperor, you needed papal blessing and it had to be given in Rome, in the church of St. Peter. Nowhere else and by no-one else.

Meanwhile the French who had kicked off the whole mess got out scot free. By the late 12th centuries their kings had been the sons of the previous king for longer than anyone could remember, and they were crowned and consecrated in Reims by the archbishop of Reims. Sure, the pope had to send a letter, but he did not interfere let alone make the French king waste his blood and treasure coming down to Rome.

Many of Barbarossa’s predecessors tried to wiggle out of this order of things, but few were as persistent as Barbarossa. His first attempt at redefining the relationship between pope and empire had ended in his prostration before Alexander III in Venice.

But he wasn’t done. This week we will discuss how he attempts to rebuild a new ideological underpinning of his role, how that leads to conflict with the popes and how he gets a chance to turn the mythmaking up to 11.

But before we start as always, a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. Thanks a lot to Derek and Eleanor who have already signed up.

And as is now customary, this episode has a dedicated website with the transcript and maps, pictures and additional comments to read along. It is to be found at historyofthegermans.com/64-2

Now back to our story.

We remember that after Besancon when Pope and emperor had fallen out over the definition of their relationship, Rainald von Dassel had developed the idea of the Holy Roman empire, an empire that was sacrum, i.e, in and of itself holy. It came with the theory of the two swords which assumes that God had handed out two swords to protect the church, the Spiritual Sword to the pope and the temporal Sword to the emperor. Together and as equals they should defend Christendom.

That part had fallen away in 1177. Pope Alexander III and his successors believed imperial power had been translated to the pope by the emperor Constantine and hence it was the Pope’s role to appoint emperors and if need be, depose them. They were his vassals. On the face of it, Barbarossa had accepted this when he prostrated himself before Alexander in Venice, as had Henry IV done when he begged for forgiveness from Pope Gregory VII.

(Venice) Il Barbarossa bacia il piede al Papa – Federico Zuccari – Sala del Maggior Consiglio

The court of Barbarossa almost immediately searched far and wide for an alternative way to support its legitimacy. Signing the peace of Venice is one thing but accepting the pope as boss who can hire and fire him was another thing.

The job to find a new framework was given to Godfrey of Viterbo, a member of the imperial chancellery. Godfrey came from the Italian city of Viterbo but was of German descent and had joined the imperial administration at an early age.

Godfrey went to work and wrote several books. The Speculum Regum, the mirror of kings, the Memoria Seculorum, the chronic of the world going back through the centuries and the Gesta Frederici, the history of the deeds of Frederick Barbarossa.

All these books were interrelated and told in a mixture of prose and poetry about what was an appropriate behaviour for an emperor and where he fits in the overall framework of the universe. And in this work, he established a theory. A theory that the empire has not only been there since the dawn of time, but that it has been held by the same family since the very beginning. Barbarossa himself traces his lineage back through the Salians and specifically Conrad II back to Carolingians and by some other linkage to the Merovingians who in turn came from the ancient city of Troy, as Aeneas did. Aeneas founded Alba Longa whose sons, Romulus and Remus founded Rome and as Virgil tells us culminated in the Julio-Claudian dynasty, one of whose descendants was obviously Clovis, whose name was the Germanic version of the name Claudius, which brings us back to the Salians and then Barbarossa.

This tilted and twisted story proves one thing, that it was God’s will that only one family should always, always rule the empire, and the latest incubation was the family of Barbarossa, or as they called themselves, the house of Waiblingen. By the way thanks to all these twists and turns a lot of the inheritance went through the female line again proving the middle ages were maybe less patriarchal than we have once been told.

By making the imperial honour a purely dynastic title that had, despite convincing proof to the contrary, had moved from father to son since time immemorial, you did away with the need to be crowned by the pope, you even could get away without going to Rome either.

It sounds bonkers given the Hohenstaufen were the ultimate nouveau riches. Barbarossa’s great-grandfather had been at best a count and Conrad II, that lynchpin of the story had also not exactly been a shoe-in for the imperial honour. But even though it should have been utterly nonsensical to most educated men and women at the time, it did have some real-world implications.

And that real world implication was the coronation of King Henry VI, the son of Barbarossa. Barbarossa was born in 1122 and had reached his 60s when Henry VI was knighted at the great Whitsunday court in Mainz in 1184. The last time an emperor had reached that age in a relatively stable position had been Otto the Great. Otto the Great had his son Otto II crowned not just king, but emperor as well. Having the future emperor all set up and anointed would be a good move that brings stability and in the current case does away with the need for a full-blown campaign in Italy. It sort of made perfect sense.

Well, it made perfect sense if you were the German emperor. It made no sense at all if you were the pope. Granting a coronation whilst the old emperor is still around would take away a major lever to extract concessions from a new and by definition not very established ruler. Remember that even the politically astute Barbarossa himself had to accept all sorts of conditions from Pope Hadrian IV when he ascended to the throne. So, the papacy blocked.

The current pope who had succeeded Alexander III, was Lucius III. Lucius III was much less of a dominant personality. But that did not mean he would give away papal prerogatives willy-nilly. Lucius III refused to crown Henry VI. That was quite a bold thing to do given his precarious situation.

Lucius III did not reside in Rome as befits a pope. The senate had thrown the papal administration out. Lucius III did not even reside in the papal lands in central Italy because here too he communes did not care much for the spiritual head of Christendom. He did in fact reside in the city of Verona.

Verona was a member of the Lombard League and as such now tied by the Peace of Constance to  Barbarossa. Giving the emperor the finger was not something his generous hosts much appreciated. So, Lucius did not publicly declare his opposition, but simply stalled.

The issue of the coronation was not the only point of contention. The other was that perennial source of conflict, the lands of Matilda of Tuscany. The inheritance of the formidable countess who had passed in 1115 was still not settled. Pope and emperor both had been named sole heir of her vast territories. Ownership and possession had moved back and forth multiple times between the principals, whilst the cities of Tuscany were throwing off the yoke of any overlordship anyway.

Lands of Matilda

But for the pope Tuscany was now absolutely vital. If he lost this, he would have lost the last piece of his directly controlled resources. He would be entirely dependent on the charity of others.

I am still amazed by the fact that on the one hand the pope cannot stand up to the citizens of Rome and it seems now not even the citizens of smaller places like Viterbo, Orvieto or Gaeta. But on the other hand, one of, if not the most powerful ruler in Europe seems unable to keep them down.

Anyway, either as a way to push through the coronation or as a matter of principle, Barbarossa insisted on his rights to the Lands of Matilda and signed an agreement with Milan for them to help enforce them.

And what did not help either was that Pope Lucius finally realised that supporting a lasting peace between the empire and the king of Sicily wasn’t just a mistake, it was an epically stupid mistake.  What is a pope to do when – God beware – the future emperor Henry VI would inherit the Kingdom of Sicily and hold the lands of Matilda, and has a strong alliance with Milan, and is recognised as the temporal overlord of Rome? Where is a pope to go when that happens?

Talking about papal woes, another issue he had to deal with was the emergence of so-called heretics, pious Christians who ploughed their own theological path. Lucius III condemned the Cathars, Paternians, Waldensians, Josephines, Pasagians, and Arnoldins and whatever other there may be in the future. These groups were a mortal danger for a clergy that often fell short in their standards of pastoral duties. The movement in lay piety that had first emerged during the reform papacy in the 11th century and had fuelled the Investiture Conflict never went away. It was suppressed as the papacy prevailed over the imperial bishops but was now re-asserting itself. The lay people’s demands for a church that walks in the footsteps of the apostles, was poor and kind and whose sacraments were pleasing to God had still not been fulfilled and was now emerging through these new movements.

Several of these trends came together in two disputes between pope and emperor.

The first was over the appointment of a suitable new archbishop of Trier. As was so often the case the canons had separately elected two different candidates. Under the concordat of Worms, it was the emperor’s prerogative to resolve such conflicts and furthermore no bishop could be formally invested before he had sworn allegiance to the emperor. Pope Lucius disregarded both of these provisions and invested one of the candidates without any regard for imperial rights.

The second issue was Lucius support for the archbishop Phillip of Cologne whose opposition to Barbarossa was coming out in the open. Why the two former friends fell out is not entirely clear, but it may well have something to do with the fall of Henry the Lion and Phillip getting his greedy paws on all of Westphalia whilst Barbarossa got the square root of nought.

With all the stress and irritation, Lucius did not last that long. He was also very, very old, 88 years to be precise, when he breathed his last.

His successor was Urban III, a member of the aristocracy of Milan. He inherited all these conflicts and for added frisson, had some axe to grind with the emperor on his own account. His relatives had been prominent defenders of Milan in the sieges of 1158 and 1162 and one of them had his nose cut off by the imperial Marshall. Urban III never forgot. He excommunicated the Marshall as soon as he had become pope, he pushed Phillip of Cologne on in his rebellion and kept blocking Henry VI coronation.

He had been archbishop of Milan before and was hence the correct archbishop to crown the King of Italy, that old Lombard kingdom. Contrary to standard procedure Urban III refused to step down as archbishop which meant that on the great wedding of Henry VI and Constance of Sicily a coronation as king of Italy could not really happen. Well, it could only happen if Urban had come over from Verona, but he did not. Barbarossa was having none of that obstinacy and called upon the Patriarch of Aquileia – whose title sounded sufficiently senior – to undertake the ceremony. And then he declared Henry VI to be a Caesar, a title not used in Western Europe at the time but a clear indication that Barbarossa was weaselling his way out of the need for an imperial coronation.

At that point Urban III almost exploded. He tried to book the cathedral of Verona to excommunicate Barbarossa, Henry VI and anyone and anything in his way. The worried citizens of Verona were deeply unexcited with the idea of an imperial army supported by Milan and to come before their walls seeking revenge. So, they blocked the entrance to the cathedral and told the Holy Father to find some other sepulchre to perform his evil deed.

Urban III set off for a suitable cathedral anywhere in Italy. After some wondering about, he alighted on the magnificent newly erected cathedral of Ferrara. That one would do.

Ferrara Catrhedral (by Markus Brunetti)

As he was laying out his vestments, prepared the frankincense and myrrh and lined up his choirboys, he keeled over and died.

What brought upon this last-minute respite was an event that took place at the other end of the medieval world, near a place called Hattin in Galilee.

The crusaders’ worst nightmare had come true between 1180 and 1187, Sala-ed-Din, the Vizir of Egypt had brought Damascus and Aleppo under his control. The entire southern and eastern border of the Kingdom of Jerusalem was now in the hands of just one man. The survival of Outre-Mer had so far relied on regular supply of new fighters from Western Europe and probably even more, on the endless squabbles amongst their Muslim and Armenian neighbours.

An attack was not only inevitable, but the likelihood of the survival of this outpost was already quite low. Internal squabbles between the now established Frankish aristocracy, the knightly orders and more recent arrivals impaired military decision making.

Nevertheless, when Sala-ed-Din mounted his great invasion army of 40,000 the crusaders rallied together and fielded the largest force they ever put together, at least a 1,000 knights and 10,000 foot soldiers and light cavalry.

Saladin’s began by attacking the city of Tiberias on the Sea of Galilee. For the crusader army to relieve Tiberias required them to cross an arid plateau, going from one spring to the next. Though his advisers, including the count who held city of Tiberias, counselled against exposing the army to a march through an almost waterless desert in July, the king, Guy de Lusignan, concluded it could, and it should be done.

On July 3rd, 1187 they left their camp at Sepphoris and marched towards Tiberias, about 30 kilometres away. They passed a spring at Tur’an which did not provide enough water for 11,000 men and their horses marching in the peak summer heat. As water became seriously scarce, the king decided to make a detour for the larger springs at Hattin. That had been anticipated by Saladin who blocked access to the springs. The Crusaders had to make camp in the middle of the desert. Saladin’s troop encircled the Franks and kept them awake throughout the night by praying, singing, beating drums and chanting. They lit the dry grass around the crusader camp making their thirsty throats even drier. Whilst the crusaders were dying of thirst, the Muslims had fresh water brought in from nearby sources and the sea of Galilee.

When the battle began the next morning, the outcome wasn’t in any doubt. Saladin’s troops outnumbered the exhausted fighters of the Kingdom of Jerusalem 2 to 1. That they mounted any kind of charge at all was a miracle. The desperate crusaders fought as hard as they could but in the end, they had to surrender. The Holy Cross that had been rediscovered in Jerusalem and had been carried before the army fell into the hands of the enemy. The elite of the crusader states became prisoners sold into slavery and the knights templars were executed.

With almost its entire military force spent, the cities of the Holy Land fell to Saladin, one by one. Acre, Nablus, Jaffa, Toron, Beirut and Ascalon had all fallen by September. Jerusalem was taken on October 2nd. The chronicler Ibn-al-Athir reports that when the victors took down the cross from the Dome of the Rock the Muslim inhabitants of the city broke into a triumphant Allah o Akbar whilst the Franks groaned in agony.

Only the city of Tyre held out thanks to reinforcements that had just arrived under the command of Conrad of Montferrat

Urban III allegedly died from shock when the message of the fall of Jerusalem reached him. His successor, Gregory VIII completely reoriented church policy in light of the calamity.

He blamed the loss of the Holy Cross and the execution of the knights templars on the division and sinfulness of Christians, not just in the Holy Land, but all over the catholic world. And he promised anyone who would undertake the journey to Jerusalem with a true heart and after repenting his sins, that those sins would be forgiven and that he would gain eternal life.

All resources need to be mobilised and old quarrels were to be forgotten, at least until Jerusalem is back in Christian hands. Gregory VII quickly ended the dispute over the succession to the archbishopric of Trier. Philipp of Cologne was ordered to reconcile with Barbarossa and the pope even called Henry VI the “elected emperor of the Romans”.

The first European monarch to take the cross was Richard the Lionheart, who will succeed his father at the end of 1189. Phillippe Augustus, king of France was next, thereby interrupting the incessant fighting between France and England that has become known as the first 100 years war.

Barbarossa and his youngest son Frederick duke of Swabia took the cross at the so-called diet of Christ in Mainz in 1188.

Barbarossa as Crusader

As we have seen with the first and second crusade, the call to go to Jerusalem caused huge risks to the Jewish communities in the cities of the Rhineland. Barbarossa, who had been on the Second Crusade knew about this and ordered all the priests and monks to refrain from preaching against the Jews. When thousands of visitors came to Mainz to formally take the cross, an altercation arose where a Jewish boy was beaten as a less convincing way to introduce him to the merciful Christian God. The circumstance could easily have turned nasty indeed, as it had done so before. Barbarossa defused the situation by riding through the streets of Mainz together with Joseph ha Cohen, a leader of the Jewish community, thereby making clear that the Jews were under his personal protection.  He imposed severe punishments on anyone who raised a hand against a member of the Jewish community.

As much as I would love to attribute this behaviour to an enlightened streak in Barbarossa’s consciousness, it is unfortunately mostly driven by commercial motivations. The Jews were subject to special imperial taxes and in return had a right to special imperial protection. In the run-up to the ruinously expensive Third Crusade, the emperor needed to protect one of his key sources of funds and financing.

For Barbarossa the Crusade was the great opportunity to not just rebuild his reign, but to bring about its apotheosis. A crowned and anointed emperor going to Jerusalem had a spiritual importance that far exceeded the notion of a French of English king doing the same.

And that has to do with Verse 20 of the Book of revelations otherwise known as the Apocalypse. Verse 20 reads as follows:


1 And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, having the key to the Abyss and holding in his hand a great chain.

2 He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.

3 He threw him into the Abyss, and locked and sealed it over him, to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore until the thousand years were ended. After that, he must be set free for a short time.

Msc.Bibl.140_r 0055

This is the text that stood godparent over a near endless number of delusions since the 1st century AD. On this podcast we did hear about the fear around the year 1000 that the coming of antichrist was imminent. We are now in the year 1188 and there was no mathematical way to suggest the 1000 years mentioned in the Book of Revelations relate to the period between Christ appearance on earth and the coming of the antichrist.

Moreover, these 1000 years were meant to be a time when Satan was bound and imprisoned in the abyss, a time when the people were to live happily and in peace. That clearly was not the time they were living in. hence the 1000 years of bliss are still to come, but how can they be brought about?

One way was prayer and good works. If only all of Christendom was cleansing itself of sin, live holy lives and stop fighting each other over worldly gains, that would bring about the 1000 years of bliss.

That notion then linked up with an older concept, the so-called imperial prophecy. According to this prophecy, a great emperor will appear just before the Millenium was to begin. That emperor will go to the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. There he will put down his crown and his sceptre. And with that act he will bring about the prophecy of Apocalypse 20, i.e., the angel will appear and bind Satan for a thousand years. East and West will unite, the Jews will be converted, and the Muslims defeated. The kingdom of peace will come about that will last until the day Antichrist is to be released again bringing about the end of the world.

The shock of the loss of Jerusalem reconciled the kings of France and England who had been at war since the beginning of time, it brought pope and emperor into alignment and even the quarrelsome cities of Northern Italy united to ease the transport of crusaders to the Holy Land. No wonder that the people who were praying daily for the deliverance of the Holy Sepulchre thought that this prophecy was about to come true. Their great hope was Barbarossa the Holy Roman Emperor, heir of Troy, descendant of Augustus, Clovis and Charlemagne who will lay down his crown once he got to Golgotha so that the world will be saved.

But will it? We will see next week whether this prophecy comes true and we are now living in a time of love and unity. I am sure you are burning to find out. So, I hope to see you then.

Before I go, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patron.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to start with me endorsing mattresses or meal kits. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. As always, all the links are in the show notes. 

Barbarossa rebuilds his reign after defeats in Italy and at home

Following the Peace of Venice and the Fall of Henry the Lion, our great emperor has reached the end of the road. Being a man of infinite resource and sagacity he climbs out of the hole, resets his political allegiances and recovers some of his previous standing.

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 63 – Recovery

Following the Peace of Venice and the Fall of Henry the Lion, our great emperor has reached the end of the road. Being a man of infinite resource and sagacity he climbs out of the hole, resets his political allegiances and recovers some of his previous standing.

As always, this episode has a dedicated website with the transcript and maps, pictures and additional comments to read along. It is to be found at historyofthegermans.com/63-2

But before we start as always a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. And thanks a lot to Caitlin and Christopher who have already signed up.

Last week we left Barbarossa at the Assembly of Erfurt crying tears of rage and self-pity as he raised up his cousin Henry the Lion and gave him the kiss of peace. His great imperial political plan had been unravelling for the last 15 years. It was time for a fundamental revision of the process.

We already talked about one part of that great U-turn, the shift in his domestic policies in Germany. No longer does he act as the independent arbiter between the princes but he has become one of them. He is now a territorial lord whose sole objective is to grow his and his families allodial possessions. With Henry the Lion out of the picture and after accumulating first the lands of his cousin Frederick of Rothenburg, his wife’s county of Burgundy and Welf VI’s ancestral lands in Swabia as well as number of counties along the Main river and into Thuringia, Saxony and Northern Bohemia, he is now the richest territorial lord in Germany. He is also the most prestigious one on account of his imperial honour. Barbarossa has been King for 30 years and emperor for 27, a very long reign, only comparable to Otto the Great and Henry IV. Having just celebrated the Queens 70 years on the throne it brings it home that length of reign confers a degree of legitimacy by itself. The vast majority of people alive in the UK cannot remember a time when the Queen had not been on the throne. In the 12th century when life expectancy was shorter and reproduction rates higher, it may well be that for the majority of inhabitants of the empire Barbarossa was the only emperor they had ever known. That may explain why he could maintain his standing in Germany despite the very obvious setbacks he had experienced.

But what about his standing on the global stage, in Italy in particular. The empire and the Lombard league had signed a 6-year truce at the peace of Venice in 1177. This truce runs out in 1183, and so negotiations start up again.

The issues are still the same, the status of that irritating City of Straw or Steel, Alessandria and the extent of imperial rights in Italy.

As for Alessandria, the artful bishops and lawyers entrusted with the negotiations come up with an ingenious decision. What we will do they say is simply re-founding the city. So, one day, sometime after June 25th, 1183 all the inhabitants of Alessandria have to leave the city. An imperial herald enters the deserted place and declares the foundation of a new city called Caesarea, named after the Kaiser Barbarossa. After that the now faithful subjects of the imperial city of Caesarea return back into their houses – and all is good.  Why did no one come up with that before – how much pain and misery could have been avoided.

Alessandria

Item two on the list of disagreement was a lot more complex. Remember the legal positions were as follows. The imperial side argued that Roman law has been eternal and made the emperor the source of all laws and the highest judge in the land.  Hence the laws of Roncaglia apply irrespective of the defeats at Alessandria and Legnano. As a consequenmce the communes owe the imperial purse the regalia. These include the rights to markets, tolls, jurisdiction and even poll taxes.

The Communes argued that all these regalia had transferred to them over the centuries and that only some of them like the Fodrum had been paid in ay man’s memory. Their established legal traditions overruled the older Roman law.

What complicate the issue was that regalia varied from city to city. That could be resolved if one appointed an independent judge or committee to adjudicate what was the emperor’s and what the city’s. But, the highest judge in the land was the emperor and the emperor like the pope insisted that they are not subject to a court of mere men. On the other hand, Barbarossa’s harsh and often biased rule in Lombardy in the 1160s had eroded any notion that he would act as an impartial judge.

These arguments could go back and forth forever, which is why the pope decided in 1177 that a comprehensive peace agreement was simply not feasible within the given timeframe and so suggested the 6-year truce.

In these six years Barbarossa finally came to the conclusion that he could no longer insist on the application of Roman law. Or well, he could insist but it would not get him anything. He was no longer able to intervene militarily in Italy to push through his claims and as long as there was no peace agreement there was no money coming from Lombardy at all.

So, he caved and accepted that established communal legal practice superseded imperial law. In return he got two things. One was that from now on the consuls of the cities of the league would have to swear allegiance to the emperor before they could be invested into their position. And secondly, a one-off payment of 15,000 mark of silver plus an annual regalia payment to be paid by the Lombard League and the payment of the Fodrum, every time the emperor comes to Italy.

With that Barbarossa regained at least nominal control over Northern Italy again.  It was better than nothing but nothing like his position in 1162. And he was even denied what League had been prepared to do in 1176 at Montebello, a formal submission. No longer are the rectors willing to kneel before the emperor with their swords on their backs and begging for forgiveness.

None of that. The signing of the peace agreement was set for June 25th in Constance, the place where 30 years earlier the merchants from Lodi had begged the emperor to intervene of their behalf which kicked off the conflict. Instead of bending the knee in a hare shirt, the representatives of the Lombard cities handed over golden keys to their cities as a sign that the emperor was welcome to take possession of their town as their overlord. They swore oaths of allegiance and did curtsy. That is a nice thing to do and not unusual when monarchs enter cities in their own lands. But is not exactly an act of penance for the acts of treason they had committed in the eyes of the imperial court.

Peace of Constance from the City Hall in Constance

Not at all. The cities and the Lombard league have been negotiating eye to eye with their ruler. They were more equals rather than vassals and even the emperor had to swear to the terms, though as was customary not by himself but through a proxy.  Even though the final documentation of the peace wasn’t made out as a bilateral treaty but an imperial privilege, the reality was that the emperor was no longer the head of Christendom but just another monarch. But then he had 15,000 Mark of silver in his pocket which is not to be sniffed at.

And what did he do with the Money? He threw a party, a party that would be talked about for centuries. England has its field of cloth of Gold, Germany has the Whitsunday Court of 1184 in Mainz. The occasion was the knighting of Barbarossa’s two eldest sons, the King Henry VI and the duke Frederick VI of Swabia. Guests had come not only from the empire but from other kingdoms as well. Franks, Germans, Slavs, Italians who dwelled between Illyria and Spain, an incredible multitude of men from different regions and diverse tongues were present for the festivities that took three days. Allegedly 70,000 men and women of rank had shown, which must be an exaggeration. But we do hear about the duke of Bohemia coming with 2,000 knights, Archbishop Philip of Cologne with 1,700, Conrad Count palatinate, Louis III of Thuringia and the new archbishop of Mainz, Conrad bringing 1,000 and even the abbot of Fulda showing up with an entourage of 500.

Barbarossa and his two eldest sons

To house these crowds a wooden city was built on the opposite side of the Rhine River from Mainz featuring a great hall as well as an even greater wooden church. The imperial princes chipped in with their own wooden palaces, each trying to outdo the other. Of the 97 Imperial princes, 71 showed up.

To give an impression of the scale, Arnold of Lubeck describes two large houses filled with crossbars on which chicken and any other kind of fowl perched from floor to ceiling, all of which will be eaten within the next three days. Wine had been brought from up and down the Rhine and Moselle Rivers. Pepper, that exotic and most expensive spice was used generously as a display of imperial wealth and largesse. Count Baldwin of Hennegau who had come to be elevated into the ranks of imperial princes felt especially under pressure to display his riches and hence clad all his men in silk. Count Bernard of Lippe found himself on the cheap seats away from the imperial radiance which upset him so much he threw the elaborately embroidered coats that served as cushions into the crowd of onlooking townsfolk. We are moving rapidly from the part of the Middle Ages when nobles would go round and say “have you seen the length of my sword to the part where they ask “have you seen the tightness of my pants?

Festivities began with a procession during which emperor and empress were wearing their crowns, as did king Henry VI. Most probably that had been preceded by a solemn mass where Frederick, Beatrix and Henry been crowned again. These festive coronations did not have any constituent effect but were just ways to elevate ceremonial events. Soe very time you see a Shakespeare play where the king wears a crown, not historically accurate. Like today, in the Middle Ages crowns are only worn on special occasions.

The next day was the main event, the knighting of the imperial sons, another great display of wealth and power, followed by a tournament. The first recorded tournament in Germany dates back just 40 years, organised by Barbarossa’s father and uncle, but by now the Buhurt has become part of the aristocratic way of life. Barbarossa, despite being already over 60 years of age took part on the fighting. This event was fought with blunt weapons, a style that gradually became the norm.

Some historians, both old and modern have traced the emergence of chivalric culture in Germany back to this event. Barbarossa’s participation in the tournament marks another step in the transition of the emperor from vicar of Christ to secular ruler who is at heart a knight like the others, bound by the same rules and ethos. I find that not very convincing as we have heard about tournaments before and the very first one is one Barbarossa had participated in. He may not have had much use for romances and Minneang, but he shared his life with his men on horseback, had fought in the heart of the battle more than once. He did adhere to the chivalric code no more and no less than other “knightly rulers” of the time. So I am more with Goerich who argues that it was a gradual transition that reflected the sign of times more than a manifestation of the political turnaround.

There is an element of politics, however. A key element of Plan B was to raise the profile of and support for the Hohenstaufen dynasty. Presenting the next generation of Hohenstaufen leaders to the empire, one already wearing the crown of a king of the romans establishes a sense of continuity, not just of the empire but also of its ruler.

Another large tournament was scheduled as a sort of closing ceremony. However, on the Tuesday a massive storm destroyed the village of tents and even some of the wooden structures. As so often in these times, it was regarded as a sign from heaven. The tournament scheduled for the next day at the nearby imperial Pfalz of Ingelheim was cancelled. Many had seen the inclement weather as gods way to enforce the papal decrees of the Third Lateran Council that banned tournaments and insisted that people who had died in these fights were not to be given Christian burial.

That was unfortunately not the only thing that went wrong at this joyous occasion. There can be problems when so many status conscious men show up for an event that at least in part is there to emphasise rank. On the festive banquet on the second day the abbot of Fulda, one of the great imperial Monasteries insisted that it was his ancient right that on royal assemblies in Franconia his place was to be seated to the left of the emperor. The right was reserved to the archbishop of Mainz which nobody disputed. That upset Philip Archbishop of Cologne and by now the most powerful imperial prince. He believed the honour should be his. When the abbot sat down he rose up and declaimed the ingratitude of the emperor in whose service the archbishop had risked his life more than once as his grey hair can attest. More than his life, he had put his soul at risk to preserve the honour of the empire, only to be now so insulted. He threatened to leave and demanded that his vassals, which included Barbarossa’s half-brother the Count palatinate as well as the count of Nassau to leave with him. At which point one of the abbot’s vassals, Louis landgrave of Thuringia mocked the count of Nassau that he was earning his fief the hard way. Nassau was about to draw his sword when young king Henry VI diffused the situation by embracing the archbishop and Barbarossa himself offered to swear an oath that he never intended to insult the archbishop.

Henry VI calms down archbishop Philip of Collogne

There have been doubts voiced whether the scene actually happened, but if it did not take place as described, it still had a cornel of truth. Following the Fall of Henry the Lion, the relationship of Barbarossa with his former chancellor and most trusted paladin, the archbishop of Cologne was on the rocks. That was probably because Philip had been one of the princes who had dragged him into dropping his cousin and who had benefitted most from the fall of the House of Welf. As we will see soon, the break between him and his former chancellor will gain momentum mirroring the more famous break-up between King Henry II and his chancellor Thomas a Beckett.

Talking about Henry the Lion note that he had now been in exile for three years and it was time to smooth things out for his return. We do know much about the detail but it seems Barbarossa and King Henry II of England, the father in law and current host of the former duke of Bavaria and Saxony hatched a plan. Despite or maybe because of their estrangement Barbarossa sent Philip, Archbishop of Cologne to London to find an arrangement with Henry. Under the watchful eye of the Plantagenet king a solution was arrived at so that by 1185 Henry the Lion was back in his ostentatious palace of Dankwarderode. But he was no longer a duke, not even an imperial prince, just a very, very rich landowner.

Dankwarderode today, a reconstruction from 1897-1906

Whilst Philip is out in England, Barbarossa goes on his sixth and final Italian expedition. This time he is not accompanied by soldiers since for the first time he is at peace with his subjects in the Regno Italia. That does not mean he travels alone. The usual gaggle of archbishops and bishops follows along as do Duke Leopold of Austria and Louis II, Landgrave of Thuringia. The point of the trip is to emphasise the recently won peace between the empire and the Lombard league. Barbarossa’s visit kicks off with a sumptuous court in Milan. From there he takes a long tour staying in Pavia, Cremona, Verona, Vicenza, Treviso, Padua, Brescia, Bergamo, Piacenza, Parma, Reggio, Modena and Bologna. Wherever he goes, the city opens its gates and welcomes their overlord. Detail is sadly sparse but one should assume that the visits are punctuated by festivities, solemn church services, the wearing of crowns and maybe again, tournaments. In a barely believable turn of events, Barbarossa even takes part in a council of the Lombard League though we do not know what his role was in the proceedings of what had been the archenemy of the emperor 7 years earlier.

One event we get to hear more about is an unusual one. You remember the siege of little Crema, this formidable little town that held out against a massive imperial army for nearly a year.  Well, the Cremaschi are still around, now living in permanent suppression by their enemies, the Cremonese. The emperor had maintained the ban on rebuilding Crema and the Lombard league, influenced by Cremona did not allow rebuilding either. When Barbarossa journeyed through their former Contado, the desperate former inhabitants of the fallen town prostrated themselves before the emperor and begged to have their case heard. Before Barbarossa could even bend down to listen to their pleas, Cremonese soldiers descended upon the unfortunates, dispersed them and killed and wounded some. This was an affront to imperial dignity, preventing him from exercising one of his key functions, adjudicating the quarrels between his subjects.

Barbarossa will use this event as an argument for something that has been in the works for at least two years by now. Cremona, which had been almost as reliable an ally as Pavia was no longer enjoying imperial favour. When Barbarossa had been down and out after the battle of Legnano he had taken refuge in the monastery of S. Agatha in Cremona. The consuls of Cremona saw the weakness of the emperor as an opportunity to force through concessions he would otherwise never had given. At the same time Cremona had lost traction with the Lombard league, in part thanks to their inept handling of the mediation after Montebello, but also simply because they were the only Lombard city that could rival Milan. One of them had to leave the League and given Milan’s dominance, that was Cremona. Barbarossa now being best mate with the League shifted allegiance to Milan and stood against Cremona.

Cremona realised that things weren’t exactly going their way. They first tried to smooth relationships with their overlord by granting him a particularly spectacular entrance into the city. They even built a special scaffold similar to what had been built for pope Alexander III in Venice so he could sit there on his throne and take their humble vows of allegiance. And, just to be on the safe side, they also built a new fortress town in Castelleone.

Cremona Cathedral finished 1170

Barbarossa made things clear when he signed an agreement of peace and friendship with Milan in February 1185. Milan promised to pay him 200 mark of silver per year and to host him and his son whenever they came down to Italy. In return he granted Milan the former Contado of Crema and promised to rebuild it. In May he set out with knights from Milan and Piacenza for the site of old Crema. The Milanese travelled with their Carroccio, the war cart before which Barbarossa had almost died fighting in 1177. Welf VI who had a crucial role in the siege of Crema was there as well. It must have been very awkward. Nevertheless, on May 7th, 1185 he leads the former citizens of Crema back into their old home. He hands the city’s consuls a wooden staff thereby enfeoffing them and the citizens with the Contado, the lands surrounding Crema. All Lombard cities were asked to help with the rebuilding, and many did. Cremona did not.

City of Crema today

The state archive of Cremona holds a slim piece of parchment that contains the transcript of a long tirade Frederick Barbarossa made before the imperial court against the city of Cremona. Cremona he says had forced him into the siege of Crema, betrayed him by rebuilding Milan in 1167, convinced the city of Lodi to defect, barred him access to the alpine passes, helped found Alessandria, paid an assassin who tried to take his life when he was besieging Alessandria, attempted to blackmail him into making concessions when he stayed at the monastery of S. Agatha in 1176 and most recently preventing the Cremasci from receiving imperial justice. In fact Cremona was responsible for the failure of Imperial policy in Northern Italy and did him and the empire damage in an amount of 300,000 Mark of silver. In light of such crimes against the honour of the empire, Cremona was put into the imperial ban, its lands forfeit and its vassals relieved from their oaths.

Barbarossa then mustered an army, mainly of forces from Milan and Piacenza, age-old enemies of Cremona and set off for the fortress town of Castelleone. It was panic stations in Cremona. No way could they hold out against the combined power of the Lombard league and the Empire. The fate of crema loomed large above the city fathers and they sent the only one in their midst who had a relationship to Germany, their bishop, Sicard. Sicard had taught canon law at the school of Mainz and had been employed by the imperial side in recent negotiations with the Papacy.

In the negotiations followed, Sicard managed to achieve a more than reasonable result. Yes, Cremona had to accept the rebuilding of Crema and their right to their Contado, handed over two fortresses they had seized from the empire and allowed the destruction of Castelleone. They also paid the emperor 1,500 denarii. But that was it. They did not have to humiliate themselves before the emperor nor did he call in the full amount of damages. The emperor even formally forgave them for the mistreatment in the past.

This is a new approach to Northern Italy of the ageing emperor. The agreement with Cremona was a balanced outcome that was acceptable to the actual principals in the dispute, Milan and Cremona. Barbarossa could finally act as the honest broker between the parties. In a weird way his policy had flipped geographically. As he had lost his position as impartial judge in Germany by pursuing his territorial ambitions there, his abandonment of territorial ambitions in Italy had turned him into the trusted authority south of the alps.

If this complete reversal of Italian communal politics isn’t astonishing enough, his changed relationship with Sicily is even more so. You remember that Barbarossa and King William II of Sicily had agreed a 15-year truce at the Peace of Venice. Not only was the truce much longer dated than the one with the Lombard League, it was also much less contentious. For a variety of reasons Barbarossa had never managed to come down to Sicily despite having intended to do so multiple times. Hence both sides could agree on the fabrication that they never really had any quarrel in the first place. That was clearly not true since the papacy had played one against the other since time immemorial. But after the German army had been destroyed before Rome in 1167 the empire could no longer reach Sicily. The relationship had already improved remarkably since then. Preliminary talks had taken place about a marriage alliance whereby William II would have married Barbarossa’s daughter Beatrice. That had not come through and William had married the daughter of King Henry II instead..

Kingdom of Sicily

Nevertheless, both sides wanted to turn the truce into a lasting peace. For William formal imperial recognition would remove any remaining doubts over the legitimacy of his kingship. For the empire a link-up with the dynasty that acted as the papal army was very attractive in light of events during the last 100 years. And it seems even the papacy itself was supportive of such a move, though I cannot for the life of me figure out why they would want an alliance between their historic foe and their most powerful defender. But then even the wily popes must make a mistake sometime.

So, everyone wants an alliance and if one wants an alliance, one wants a marriage. And that is where the problem is. The Hautevilles, once so famous for their incredible fecundity had run out of legitimate offspring. William II had not yet produced an heir with his wife, Joan of England. He had no brothers with legitimate offspring. There was an illegitimate cousin called Tancred who had daughters, but that was no good. That only leaves his aunt, Constance. Constance was born in 1154 and was hence 3O years old. Being literally the last living legitimate member of the House of Hauteville apart from King William II, she was also the heiress of the kingdom. Sending the heiress to the greatest of Norman kingdoms to Germany wasn’t what anybody wanted, but Constance was the only option. A risky gamble but William II was till young.

She was to marry Henry VI, himself born 1165, hence 10 years her junior. The engagement was announced in 1184 and the couple first met in August 1185 at Rieti. Not since the arrival of the empress Theophano In 972 did a German emperor see such an impressive entry. The riches of the King of Sicily were legendary, but seeing 150 horses laden with gold, silver, velvet, cloth and furs let the assembled knights’ jaws drop to the floor. Later the value of her dowry was taxed at 40,000 mark of silver, almost 3 times what the Lombard league paid to have peace with the empire.

Constance of Sicily

The marriage took place on January 27th, 1186 in the Monastery of Sant Ambrogio in Milan, that same church where you can find Leanardo’s last supper. At that ceremony, Henry VI was crowned King of Italy by the Patriarch of Aquilea and Constance Queen of the Romans by a German bishop. The wooden scaffolds and seating built in the courtyard was so elaborate that when the monks sold it later they received enough funds to stage another procession in the honour of the new king and queen.

Milan St. Ambrogio Courtyard

At the same time Barbarossa, in line with ancient Roman and Byzantine tradition declared his son Henry VI a Caesar, an imperial title below his own as Augustus.

Before Constance had set off for Milan, the Sicilian Barons had again been asked to swear allegiance to her just in case King William II would die without an heir or heiress. Nobody think this would happen as William was 31 and his bride 20 years old, plenty of time to make more babies.

But they will not, make babies, turning Constance into the richest heiress in Europe, richer than Eleanor of Aquitaine whose son’s ransom will ultimately pay for the army needed to enforce that inheritance. But that will come later.

Before we get to this, we still have at least two episodes of Barbarossa to get through. The guy is bloody tenacious. Another six years to go before he finally meets his maker on a small river in Anatolia. I hope you will come along.

Before I go, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patron.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to start with me endorsing mattresses or meal kits. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. As always, all the links are in the show notes. 

Frederick Barbarossa has to let his Frenemy Henry the Lion go down

This episode deals with, guess what, the fall of Henry the Lion from his position as duke of Saxony and Bavaria. The interesting bit is not so much whether it happened, that is pretty obvious, but why it happened. When I learned about it in school, it was seen as the greatest moment of Barbarossa’s career, taking down the eternal rival of the Hohenstaufen family, but today, historians see it very differently. Follow along and make up your own mind.

Transcript

Hello and welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 62 – The Fall of Henry the Lion

This episode deals with, guess what, the fall of Henry the Lion from his position as duke of Saxony and Bavaria. The interesting bit is not so much whether it happened, that is pretty obvious, but why it happened. When I learned about it in school, it was seen as the greatest moment of Barbarossa’s career, taking down the eternal rival of the Hohenstaufen family, but today, historians see it very differently. Follow along and make up your own mind. Talking about following along, there is an episode website at historyofthegermans.com/62-2 where you can find the transcript, maps and images that makes it easier to check places and names as you listen to the podcast.

Before we start just a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. And thanks a lot to Christopher and Simon who have already signed up.

Last week we watched Barbarossa signing the peace of Venice and prostrate before Pope Alexander III. Whether that was a total capitulation or a decent deal under adverse circumstances we can leave for others to debate endlessly. What it meant though was a complete reorganisation of the political map of the empire. The schism was over Alexander III was now the undisputed pope.

(Venice) Il Barbarossa bacia il piede al Papa – Federico Zuccari – Sala del Maggior Consiglio

The antipope Calixtus the III was convinced of this fact through the thoughtful administration of steel by the ever-belligerent archbishop Christian of Mainz. There was a six-year truce between the empire and the Lombard League that, as we will see next week, ends with a lasting peace and a rearrangement of loyalties amongst the Italian cities. That leaves Sicily where both sides agree to an even longer, a 15-year truce, after reassuring each other that in fact they never had any hostile intent, like never, ever. This must be one of the early cases on cotemporaneous rewriting of history.

And lastly emperor Manuel had been comprehensively beaten by the Turkish sultan Kilic Arslan II at the battle of Myriokephalon which dispatched with the need to sign an actual peace treaty with Constantinople. Apparently the two emperors wrote each other insulting letters, calling each other respectively king of the Germans and king of the Greeks. The Vasilev’s letter was written in gold ink on purple parchment underlining a superiority that wasn’t matched by his military strength on the ground.

Battle of Myriocephalon according to Gustave Dore

As for Barbarossa the peace of Venice was the endpoint of his previous policy to create a Holy Roman Empire that was based on control of Italy including the city of Rome and equivalence of emperor and pope. He now has to go back to plan B, the strategy he had initiated back in 1167 as a fallback for exactly this eventuality. Plan B was to focus on dynastic expansion. That means grow allodial possessions, consolidate territory and raise the status of the House of Hohenstaufen. Basically the plan is to become the biggest territorial prince in the empire. Apart from Plan B his other main to-do was to stabilise the political situation in Germany where his beautifully calibrated  system of checks and balances between the great magnates was about to collapse.

Hohenstaufen, Welf and Ascanier lands around 1175

Ok, but if I still had bruises on my knees from the perennial prostration before my archenemy and a to-do-list consisting of only unpleasant things, I would prefer to hide in the South of France for a few months before I go and face the inevitable.

And that is exactly what Barbarossa did. He went to Provence, which as part of the kingdom of Burgundy was also part of his empire. His destination was the gorgeous and ancient city of Arles. He did not come to see the magnificent arena or the elysian fields with their antique funerary monuments, but the cathedral where he was crowned King of Burgundy. He was the first emperor since Conrad II had acquired Burgundy who got himself crowned and also the first to do it in Arles, the capital of Provence. Why did he do that? Apparently, there was an attempt by Manuel to get back in the game by marrying one of his nieces to the margrave of Provence and Barbarossa had to prevent that. Maybe, but my money is on that he wanted a few months away from it all, a big party and the adulation of his people, as fake as that may have been.

Markus Brunetti, Arles Cathedral St. Trophine, 2015. One of the greatest photography artists. check him out here: https://www.yossimilo.com/exhibitions/markus-brunetti-2015-09

From Arles he and his wife Beatrix travelled north on the Rhone River to Vienne, where Beatrix was crowed Queen of Burgundy. That was a pretty poor consolation prize given she had just unceremoniously been made a non-empress by the Peace of Venice. Pope Alexander III had offered to crown her empress again if she came down to Rome but that was apparently not on the cards. Barbarossa had sent Christian of Mainz to ensure Alexander III could get back into Rome as per the stipulations of the peace, but he did not go himself nor take his wife there to be crowned.

Kingdom of Burgundy

This may be the reason for the separation of the imperial couple that now follows. For the next 6 years we only have three documented incidents of both of them in the same place. It seems that Beatrix stayed behind in her ancestral Burgundy leaving her husband to face the music alone. It might also have simply been the case that after 11 pregnancies and a life in the saddle following her husband across the alps five times she simply had enough and retired to her own domains.

When Barbarossa returned to Germany in October 1178 he entered into to use a technical term,  veritable shitstorm. His entire domestic policy framework was collapsing in the wake of the peace of Venice.

Before we go into the events of 1178 to 1181 itself let us take a look back at German domestic politics. We have spent so much time in Italy these last few episodes that we have sort of lost track of what happened north of the Alps.

Just to recap – Barbarossa’s rise to power in 1152 was such a towering success because he managed to reconcile the major families who had driven the civil wars during and following the Investiture controversy, the House of Welf, the Babenberger, the Zaehringer and obviously the Hohenstaufen themselves. Each was given something tangible in exchange for voting for Barbarossa and for keeping the peace afterwards. The Zaehringer were made the rectors of Burgundy a not very well defined viceregal position, the Babenberger were made Dukes of Austria with almost complete autonomy and the greatest prize went to the House of Welf, Barbarossa’s uncle Welf VI was given the Lands of Matilda and the duchy of Spoleto and Henry the Lion was given the duchy of Bavaria on top of his duchy of Saxony. Lastly most of the Hohenstaufen lands went to Frederick of Rothenburg, the oldest son of king Konrad III who would have had a strongest competing claim on the crown.

That created a very nicely balanced environment. The emperor himself had very limited own allodial land, making him a credible arbiter between the princes and reduced the risk of territorial conflict with an individual one. Amongst the princes, the Welf were the most powerful, but not more powerful than the combined force of the other three. Plus Welf VI was more closely attached to his nephew Barbarossa then to his other nephew Henry the Lion.

But time keeps moving forward and a couple of things happened. First up, Barbarossa began to suppress the Zaehringer who had always been fierce local rivals of the Hohenstaufen in Swabia. Their big knock back came when Barbarossa married Beatrix which gave him control over the most significant territory in Burgundy, the France Comte. And the in 1162 Frederick convinced henry the Lion to divorce his wife Clementia of Zaehringen thereby breaking the alliance between the House of Welf and the Zaehringer. Despite this disregard for his interests and honour Duke Berthold of Zaehringen would continue to serve Barbarossa in his campaigns, which indicates how severely the Zaehringer position had been diminished.

As for the Babenberger dukes of Austria, they were left alone to pursue their interests in the east, namely in Bohemia, Poland and Hungary whose dukes and kings were regularly furnished with Babenberger wives and when needed Babenberger soldiers.

That brings us to Henry the Lion. As time went on past 1155, Henry the Lion became a major pillar of the regime. When Barbarossa needed support for the sieges of Milan and Crema, henry the Lion was right there with 1200 knights and their retinue. The Welf was also willing to press his old family connections to the papacy, the courts of France and England and even to Constantinople into Barbarossa’s service. In 1165 when Barbarossa tried to create a marriage alliance with England, the Lion effectively stood in as a proto-son of the emperor and married Matilda, daughter of King Henry II.

Henry the Lion and Matilda with their respective parents and grandparents

This loyalty was amply rewarded. Henry the Lion received support in taking over inheritances such as that of the count of Winzenburg, he was granted the advocacy over the immensely rich monastery of Reichenau and, just to underline his exalted position, the right to invest bishops in his Northern German territories. That right had been reserved for the emperor and as we know fought over extensively.

This obvious preference for Henry the Lion was rubbing many of the more junior princes up the wrong way. Most opposed to the Lion was Albrecht the Baer, Margrave of Brandenburg who had claimed the duchy of Saxony during the time of King Conrad III and whose territories grew thanks to his ruthlessness and military capabilities. He was by now a significant player, at least on par with the Zaehringen dukes. His interest constantly clashed with Henry the Lion, but he made little progress on that side because Barbarossa kept supporting the Lion.

Samed map again – the lands of Albrecht the Baer are Ascanier (pink) bordering Welf lands of Henry the Lion.

The other party that was growing in stature were the archbishops of Cologne. First Rainald von Dassel as Barbarossa’s closest advisor helped increase the standing of the archbishopric. More significantly was however Phillip of Heinsberg, his successor. Heinsberg was a member of the high aristocracy with extensive connections in Saxony. He had also headed the imperial chancery after Rainald von Dassel was elevated to the archbishopric of Cologne. Hence, he was very close to Barbarossa. And as time went by, became much closer to the emperor than Henry the Lion.

Elke Wetzig (Elya) – File:Grabmal_Philipp_von_Heinsberg_Kölner_Dom_0622.jpg

We see the finely balanced political structure of 1155 is starting to get distinctly lopsided by the mid-1160s. The Zaehringers are on the way out and the Babenbergers disengaged. Henry the Lion is becoming ever more powerful thanks to imperial sponsorship. And Henry made sure it was visible to everyone. He had himself an enormous palace built in what is now the city of Brunswick, a palace  larger than the imperial palaces Barbarossa had erected in Gelnhausen and Kaiserslautern. Outside the priory church of Brunswick he displayed a gilded bronze sculpture of a lion 1.8m high, 2.8m long weighing 880kg. This sculpture was a masterpiece of medieval metalwork modelled on such famous animal sculptures as the Capitoline wolf in Rome or the lions of St. Mark that Henry might have seen during his Italian campaigns. This Brunswick lion was the symbol not of the duchy as such, but of the duke himself. This whole idea of stylising himself as a lion, symbol of a strong ruler since antiquity was an affront, not just to the emperor, his overlord, but his Saxon nobles as well.

The Brunswick Lion Copyright: Herzog Anton Ulrich-Museum Braunschweig Museumsfoto: Claus Cordes

At the height of his powers in Saxony Henry the Lion held a concentrated territory around Luneburg and Brunswick, as well as lands in the Harz mountains and in southern Saxony. He was advocate of over fifty churches including the bishoprics of Bremen, Osnabrueck and Verden and the imperial abbey of Corvey. Approximately 400 lineages of Ministeriales, i.e., unfree servant knights, obeyed him directly. His longer-term plan was to make the whole duchy of Saxony his territory. For that he needed to make the local counts and knights his direct vassals so that every time the line dies out, he can confiscate their land for his own allodial property. Essentially he is inserting himself between the Saxon nobles and the emperor.

Things almost blew up as early as 1163 when Albrecht the Baer managed to bring together a coalition of Saxon nobles, including the imperial brother-in-Law, landgrave Ludwig von Thuringen, several other Saxon counts and the Babenberger network, i.e., the king of Bohemia, the Margrave of Steier and the Duke of Austria.  Only personal intervention of by the emperor broke this conspiracy.

In 1166 things finally get out in the open. The moment looks right since Barbarossa is down in Italy with one of the largest armies he ever fielded, the army that will eventually perish in Rome.  The Saxon counts led by Albrecht the Baer and the archbishop Wichman of Magdeburg besiege Henry in his castle in Haldensleben – unsuccessfully. Whilst this is going on, the archbishopric of Cologne joins the conspiracy. This happened with the full consent of Rainald von Dassel who was then archbishop, which is interesting in itself given how close Rainald is to Barbarossa.

When the emperor returns in 1167 he brings the conflict to an end essentially by putting his entire weight behind Henry the Lion. As the chronicler Helmond of Bosau says: ”fear of the emperor stayed the hand of the Saxon princes”. We talked about that in Episode 59.

Henry repays the imperial support in creating peace by picking another fight with the princes, this time over the election of the new archbishop of Bremen. Again, Barbarossa supports Henry’s candidate, even over the son of Albrecht the Baer. Nothing it seems can get between the emperor and Henry the Lion.

But something does. I believe there are three parallel and intertwined developments.

The first one is Barbarossa’s plan B. He is building out his own allodial property, pretty much like all the other princes. The deaths of 1167 create a whole avalanche of inheritances, many of which the emperor now grabs using the power of his office. That knocks off one of the last legs of that equilibrium of 1155, the impartiality of the emperor.

Secondly there is the small matter of Barbarossa’s defeats, first in 1167 and then in 1177, which undermine his prestige.

The last key development is that Henry the Lion and Barbarossa are drifting apart.

When Barbarossa cleared out his enemies between 1167 and 1172, the Lion, instead of helping to organise a new expedition to Italy,  disappears off on pilgrimage for a year. By the way I have produced a whole episode on that journey to Jerusalem for the Patreon feed if you are interested.

Artwork for Patreon episode showing one of the treasures Henry brought back from the East.

Then there is the issue of  the inheritance of Welf VI. The old rascal had initially promised his lands to Henry against a sizeable payment but that fell through when the lion thought the old guy would snuff it soon, so no need to hand him the cash now. Barbarossa stepped into the breach and snatched the lands from under his nose. That was the first but not the last time Barbarossa decided issues of allodial lands in his interest against the Lion.

The Lion’s response was not to offer Barbarossa support on his Fifth Italian expedition. Some argue that the Lion could not send his soldiers to Italy when his enemies were set against him. I find that deeply unconvincing. If he can go on a trip to Jerusalem for a year, he may as well go to Italy or at least send some troops to support his benefactor. And then there is the famous encounter at Chiavenna where Barbarossa allegedly begged Henry on his knees for support. If that had indeed happened, the enmity between Barbarossa and Henry was set when he returned to Germany in October 1178. But even if that was not the case, the old alliance between the two cousins had some serious cracks.

Alleged kneeling of Barbarossa before henry the Lion in 1176 at Chiavenna

In the meantime, some people have stepped into the open position of best friend and supporter of the emperor, and these were the archbishops of Cologne, Mainz and Magdeburg. They provided the 1000 knights that perished in Legnano and they were the ones who helped negotiate the peace of Venice. Two of them, Cologne and Magdeburg had interests in Saxony and had been involved in the uprising against the Lion in 1166.

And these three now sit at the source of all ecclesiastical power, i.e., they are negotiating with pope Alexander III about who remains of the schismatic bishops and who does not. And they have a carte Blanche from the emperor. And guess what, the first to drop by the wayside are the archbishops of Bremen and the bishop of Halberstadt that have been put in place on the Lion’s behalf. Not much he or Barbarossa can do about that.

In 1178 the old bishop of Halberstadt that the archbishops of Cologne and Magdeburg had just brought  demands that  all the lands that his predecessor had given over to the Lion are to be returned. That triggered a number of other disputes including one between the Philipp Archbishop of Cologne and Henry over the inheritance  of the count of Assel. That led to a spiral of claims and counterclaims across Saxony that turned into open warfare by the summer of 1178.

When Barbarossa holds court in Speyer in November 1178 having returned from his year in Provence, he is immediately confronted with the dilemma. At Speyer both Philipp of Cologne and Henry the Lion, the two arguably most powerful princes and the ones Barbarossa owes most gratitude demand justice. They were combative and both utterly convinced of their standing with the emperor.

Speyer cathedral

Barbarossa refuses to adjudicate right now on the grounds that a proper court has not been convened nor the preparations for the proceedings completed. He proposes another imperial diet in Worms in January 1179 to discuss and hopefully resolve the issues.

Despite being formally summoned Henry the Lion does not show at the diet in Worms, which is the usual way for a major aristocrat to make clear that he does not recognise the claims as valid. That being said, it is often also a sign that the absent party is doubtful it still enjoys the imperial grace. Phillip of Cologne does show up, indicating that he has a lot more confidence in his standing with Barbarossa.

Another court date is set for June 1179 at Magdeburg, Henry is summoned and again Henry does not show up. Now Barbarossa is getting seriously irritated. Not showing up on the second summons is a serious disregard of imperial authority. The imperial honour is diminished and needs to be restored.

Barbarossa puts Henry into the ban as a means to force him to appear at the next imperial diet. Under normal circumstances at this stage of the proceedings there cannot be any more personal interaction between the banned individual and the emperor until the rebel has bent the knee. It is an indication of how much Barbarossa wants this issue to go away that he nevertheless seeks out Henry at his nearby castle at Haldensleben. He offers to put an end to all of this against the payment of 5000 mark of silver. That is a significant amount of money, but Henry is rich, and it relieves him from having to go through the normal reconciliation procedure which involves at least kneeling before the emperor and begging for forgiveness. But even now Henry keeps misreading the situation and refuses.  

Haldensleben is just 15km from Magdeburg

Why? Maybe he thought that his rise to the dizzying heights of dual dukedom and vast territories was all his doing. It would not be the first time that a powerful man forgets who helped him up there. Or he thought that it is finally the day when he, Henry the Lion, grandson of emperor Lothar III will finally overcome Barbarossa, a mere great-grandson of an emperor.

Family tree of Hohenstaufen adn Welf (part 1)

Having seen his most generous offer refused, there isn’t anything left to do. Barbarossa returns to his court in Magdeburg and together with the princes, he outlaws Henry the Lion on June 29th, 1179. A last summons is issued for the court at Naumburg in July, but again Henry does not appear.  In August Henry gets prescribed by the court of princes and they deprive him of his duchy of Saxony and declare that another man is to be put in his place.

Henry opens hostilities. His campaign in 1179 is quite successful. He beats Cologne in a battle near Osnabrueck. By September 23rd he breaks into Halberstadt, burns it down, including its venerable cathedral, and captures the bishop. He occupies the castle of Sommerschenburg, home of another one of the important Saxon families who opposed him.

Schloss Sommerschenburg in ~1860

The princes raise another army of 4000 mercenaries and they again besiege Haldensleben and again fail to take it. Now the bickering begins between the conspirators, in particular because Phillip of Cologne had assumed command against the opposition of the margrave of Meissen, who, he is certain, would have done a much better job. After they lifted the siege Henry marches before Magdeburg as a show of force. The year 1179 ends victorious for Henry.

A full imperial diet meets again in Wuerzburg in early 1180 which culminates in what called the Gelnhausen charter. The Gelnhausen charter does holds great significance for Germany, one as a constituent document for the structure of the Holy Roman empire, and secondly for one of the longest sentences in the middle ages, in Latin by the way, not German.

Pfalz Gelnhausen, Barbarossa’s Imperial palace

It justifies the deposition of Henry the Lion and reads as follows:

Quote: Wherefore let the generality of the present as well as future subjects of our empire know, that Henry the former duke of Bavaria and Westphalia, for the reasons that he gravely oppressed the liberty of the churches of god and of the nobles of the empire, occupying their possessions and diminishing their rights, – on account of the urgent complaints of the princes and very many nobles, inasmuch as being summoned he scorned to present himself before our majesty; did, both for his contumacy and for scorning the Swabian princes of his rank, incur the sentence of our proscription. Then as he did not desist from raging against the churches of God and the rights and liberties of the princes and nobles, being cited by the lawful triple edict, according to feudal law, before our presence, as well as to answer for the injury to the princes as for the repeated contempt shown to us, and, chiefly, for the evident crime of high treason:-for the reason that he absented himself and sent no one to respond for him he was judged contumacious; and, for the future, as well the duchy of Bavaria as that of Westphalia and Angaria, and also all the benefices which he has held from the empire were, in a solemn court in Wuerzburg by unanimous sentence of the princes declared forfeit by him and adjudged to our jurisdiction and power” end quote.

This translation is by the way from John B Fried’s most beautifully written and most detailed biography of Frederick Barbarossa. This book has become an indispensable companion in the preparation for this series and I want to thank Dale Holzwart for pointing it out to me. Thanks a lot Dale.

Available here: https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Frederick-Barbarossa-by-John-B-Freed/9780300122763

So, what does this very long sentence mean. Despite professor Fried’s deft translation, it remains confusing.

Only the last bit is comparatively clear, the princes have unanimously declared his duchies and all other fiefs he is holding from the empire to be forfeit. That means he loses all assets and resources he is holding through his office, such as the lands and privileges associated with being duke of Bavaria. What he does not lose is his private, or allodial possessions.

What is harder to get your head around is the legal argument why he loses it. There seem to be three arguments intertwined. One is that he had “gravely oppressed the churches and nobles”, the second is contempt of court as he had not appeared despite triple summons and lastly, there is the mention of the “evident crime of high treason”. The last argument is the least convincing. The use of the word “evidently” is a good indicator of total absence of evidence. That leaves the first two, oppression and obstinate refusal to appear in court. The document supposes that there is an established procedure to deal with someone who breaches the peace, and that is to be brought before the court to be judged. Failure to appear upon the third summons automatically results in being outlawed and all fiefs forfeit.

That sounds pretty sensible and straightforward, but according to both Fried and Goerich these are legal frameworks introduced with this document rather than well established precedents. This elaborate argumentation did not just satisfy the need of an increasingly literate and legal world, it also had a practical component.

Under established procedure a rebellious vassal who rebelled for the first time could usually expect to be readmitted to the imperial favour after suitable penance. In that case most of his previous position would be restored to him. That was an unacceptable risk for the princes. They needed to be sure that the Lion would never come back as duke of Saxony.

Therefore, the Gelnhausen document established the royal court’s decision as final. And to cement the decision even further, the duchy of Saxony is being split. The western part, Westphalia was given to the archbishop of Cologne, thereby dramatically increasing the diocese resources. And the eldest son of now deceased Albrecht the Bear, Berthold of Anhalt is made duke of the somewhat smaller Saxony. Other fiefs go to the remaining conspirators, including margrave Otto of Meissen from the house of Wettin. Another son of Albrecht, Siegfried receives the archbishopric of Hamburg-Bremen.

The break-up of Saxony created three duchies, Westphalia (pink), the Ascanian Saxony (green) and late rteh Welf duchy of Brunswick.

That was the duchy of Saxony, but what about the other one Henry held, the duchy of Bavaria? That went to none other than our old friend Otto von Wittelsbach. All of Bavaria, no, not all of Bavaria. As with Saxony bits and bobs were cut off. The Margrave of Steier became the duke of Steiermark, independent of the Wittelsbachs. The same goes for the counts of Andechs who became dukes of Meranien again, independent of Bavaria.

„Pfalzgrafs Otto von Wittelsbach Belehnung mit dem Herzogthum Bayern 1180″; Entwurf und Ausführung Clemens Zimmermann

Distributing the spoils is all fine and good, but what about the military situation? 1179 wasn’t much of a success for the opposition against the Lion and the spring of 1180 wasn’t much better. Henry managed to capture Landgrave Ludwig von Thuringen, one of the main conspirators.

Things only turned for the princes when the emperor himself took up arms. This clear sign that the emperor had dropped his old favourite and was now threatening any supporter of Henry with the loss of their fiefs changed the picture. More and more of Henry’s vassals and even his loyal Ministeriales changed sides, growing afraid they could lose it all. A number of important fortresses fell to the imperial army and by the end of 1180 Henry’s power was confined to the lands north of Brunswick and the castle of Haldensleben.  Haldensleben was surrounded by the forces of archbishop Wichman of Magdeburg and since the castle could not be taken by force the bishop dammed up the local river and simply flooded it. Haldensleben surrendered on May 3rd, 1181 and was destroyed. Nothing remains of this once almighty fortress. The summer campaign of 1181 started in earnest when Barbarossa appeared in Saxony in June 1181. He pushed Henry out of Brunswick and pursued him to Luneburg, from where the Lion escaped again, this time north to Stade on the Elbe River. Henry realised his position had become untenable and mustered a ship that was to take him to exile with his father-in-law, the king of England.

Map highlighting the key locations of the fighting. Haldensleben is the dot close to MAgdeburg

Barbarossa took his host to Lubeck on the Baltic Sea, the furthest north he would ever travel in his realm. The modern city of Lubeck had only been founded in 1143 but was the absolute boomtown of Northern Germany. Its geographic location as a link between the Baltic and Germany made it the lynchpin for trade with Scandinavia and Russia. Henry the Lion acquired the city in 1158 and turbocharged development by granting it a range of trade privileges. In 1160 the city was given a constitution that established a ruling council of 24 members of the major merchant families, a constitution that remained well into the 19th century. In 1163 it became a bishopric when the bishop of Oldenburg transferred to Lubeck.

Given all this support, Lubeck was one of the last remaining places loyal to Henry. The citizens are now in a difficult situation. Imperial power that far north had been almost entirely absent for centuries. Opening the gates to Barbarossa bears the risk that once he goes back south, he will forget about them, and their position would be eroded. So, they asked the emperor for permission to consult with Henry before surrendering. Barbarossa allowed it and Henry told the citizens to open the gates. Barbarossa was massively taken with Lubeck and made it a free imperial city, independent of the local princes, and a few years later granted them territorial rights that further stabilised the rapid development. This intelligent balancing between the House of Welf, who, surprise, surprise will come back eventually, and Barbarossa allowed the city to continue on its path that would make them one of the leaders of the Hanseatic League, the subject to our next season.

With that the war was over. Henry the Lion submitted and was brought to the imperial camp in Luneburg. From there he was escorted by archbishop Wichman of Magdeburg to Erfurt, where he prostrated himself before Barbarossa on November 11, 1181. Frederick lifted his cousin Henry up and, flooded with tears, gave him the kiss of peace..

But, though all the formalities of submission were adhered to and by the traditions of the time, a first-time offender would receive his position back, he did not. As the chronicler Arnold of Lubeck reported, Barbarossa had sworn an oath to the princes, not to let Henry back into his positions without their unanimous consent. He was allowed to keep his allodial lands around Brunswick and Luneburg but the princes did not dare to let him stay in Germany.  Henry the Lion and his wife Matilda had to go into exile to the court of Henry II, King of England.

That is the fall of Henry the Lion.

When I learned about in school, it was described as Barbarossa’s final triumph. The great struggle between Welf and Hohenstaufen, between Guelph and Ghibelline had seen the greatest of the Welf defeated. It was Barbarossa’s revenge for the humiliations of his father at the election of 1138, and his uncle Konrad III at the hand of Henry the Proud and his own at Chiavenna. But this story has now been pretty much completely debunked. Barbarossa may have lost confidence in the support of Henry the Lion after his refusal to help in 1174 but he did not pursue a policy to bring him down. That was very much the princes doing. They were the ones who found the double duke unbearably powerful. As we have seen, Barbarossa had even tried to prevent the downfall by offering to take him back against payment of 5000 mark of silver. Instead of being Barbarossa’s greatest moment, it was probably his deepest defeat. He was no longer able to protect his cousin or even offer clemency when it was all over. After the defeats in the fifth Italian campaign and the peace of Venice he had become the plaything of the Princes. The clearest sign that his power had diminished was that Barbarossa himself received practically nothing of the spoils of this war. No way was he able to annex the two duchies of Bavaria and Saxony for himself in the way the French king Phillippe Augustus did with Normandy, Anjou, Maine, Touraine and Poitou after the defeat of John lackland. The tears that Barbarossa cried when he raised Henry the Lion up in Erfurt were not so much tears of pity for his cousin but for his own weakness, that is at least what Knut Gorich believes.  

The scene as depicted in the city hall of Erfurt

The other important impact of the fall of Henry the Lion was the settlement of the political landscape and constitution of the empire.

The precedent of Henry the Lion not only established under which circumstances a fief could be lost, but also that this fief had to be regranted to another prince within a year and a day.

With the break-up of Saxony and Bavaria, the old stem duchies of the Ottonian times no longer functioned as a mid-layer between emperor and counts. A new layer has been established the Reichsfurstenstand, the imperial princes. An imperial prince is someone who owes allegiance only to the emperor, he or she is reichsunmittelbar, a direct vassal of the empire. These were the dukes, but also the counts palatinate, the landgraves and margraves. Other counts are of a lower rank as they are in vassalage to an imperial prince. Bishops were in the majority imperial princes, as were the abbots and abbesses of the imperial monasteries.

This has two effects. No longer can an emperor demand suit from all the knights and counts in the land. He can only call on the imperial princes as those are the only ones with direct feudal obligations to him. Secondly, the princely ranks are becoming a closed shop. If an imperial princely position becomes vacant, it has to go to another prince which means it is staying within the network of the highest aristocracy. No longer can an emperor appoint a duke or margrave at will.

Families who have made it onto the list of Imperial princes by the 1180s will continue to be dominant for the next 700 years. The Ascanians ruling Saxony and Brandenburg, the Wettins, running Meissen and Lusatia, the Wittelsbach in Bavaria and the Palatinate, the Zaehringer whose junior line will keep Badenia and the House of Welf that will return as dukes of Brunswick and later kings of Hannover. Some like the Ludowiger and Andechser will gradually vanish, and the Habsburgs and the Hohenzollern will make it to the top table. But it is getting harder.

The Holy Roman empire is gradually taking shape. And that is where we should leave it for this week. Next week we will look at the resolution of issues in Italy, in particular the political shifts there that will dominate most of Hohenstaufen policy of the next couple of decades, and maybe we get to talk about the build-up to the Third crusade. I hope to see you then.

Lastly, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patron.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to start with me endorsing mattresses or meal kits.. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. Quick thank you to SteveAshville on Reddit who posted a super nice comment. So thanks a lot Steve and all of you who seconded his shout. As always, all the links are in the show notes. 

The reconciliation between Barbarossa and Pope Alexander III

This week we will talk about the great peace conference in Venice where Barbarossa is finally reconciled with the papacy, the Lombards and the Sicilians.It is also the time he has to bend the knee before his implacable foe, Pope Alexander III in a grand ceremony before all of Europe.

Transcript

Hello and Welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 61 – The Peace of Venice

This week we will talk about the great peace conference in Venice where Barbarossa is finally reconciled with the papacy, the Lombards and the Sicilians.It is also the time he has to bend the knee before his implacable foe, Pope Alexander III in a grand ceremony before all of Europe.

As before there is an episode website at historyofthegermans.com/61-2 where you can find the transcript, maps and images to follow along. And by the way I have finally re-recorded episode 59, now sniffle free, 14 days later.

Before we start just a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. And thanks a lot to Stephanie, Erika and Sean who have already signed up.

Let‘s go back where we left off last week. On June 5th 1176 Barbarossa re-appears in Pavia having lost the encounter with the Milanese at Legnano. His armour, sword and lance as well as his treasure had been left on the field of battle. Even though he still had some military capabilities left, his campaign had hit the end of the road.

Like in 1167/68 after the loss of the army before Rome, the emperor goes incommunicado. Just once charter is produced in the 6 months following Legnano. We hear about illness, possibly another bout of Malaria.

It is at this stage that Barbarossa finally gives up on his imperial dreams. He gives his archbishops, namely Wichman of Magdeburg and Christian of Mainz Carte Blanche to negotiate with Pope Alexander III. When I say Carte Blanche, I mean full authority to bind the emperor. Barbarossa swears to honour whatever his envoys agree with the pope.

Wichmann v. Magdeburg

Such a fundamental abrogation of control requires an explanation. Cardinal Boso reported that quote “Indeed all the Princes of his Kingdom, both ecclesiastical and secular, who until that time had followed Frederick in his errors, told him that unless he made peace with the Church they would follow him no longer, nor give him any aid” unquote. Boso as a partisan of Alexander III is not the most reliable source when it comes to the inner workings of the empire. But on this occasion, he may be right.

Barbarossa’s reign in Northern Italy was entirely built on military might. The secular princes have stopped supporting this effort after the catastrophe of 1167. Money for Mercenaries had run out in 1176. His only source of soldiers were the bishops.

The bishops, in particular those who had been former members of the imperial chancery were personally loyal to the emperor and the imperial agenda in Italy. But on ecclesiastical matters they were more and more leaning towards Alexander III. That is not much of a surprise given Barbarossa himself made little efforts to boost his antipope Calixtus III and had opened negotiations with Alexander before. After the string of defeats that could easily be seen as God’s judgement on the imperial position in the schism, the bishops now wanted reconciliation with the pope before it was too late. And Barbarossa had no option other than to accept.

He tried to keep the initiative and proposed a church council for both Alexander III and Calixtus III to attend and where Alexander III would then be declared the true pope. But nobody responded. Events have run away from him.

The bishops meet Alexander III’s negotiators in Agnani in October 1177. The envoys kicking off the discussion by saying, according to Boso quote “’Our lord the Emperor, being most desirous to grant you and the Church of Rome true peace, has sent us with plenary powers to your presence and urgently requests that that agreement of concord and peace, which last year your brothers negotiated with him and which has remained through his fault a dead letter, be now concluded by us and with your consent, under the protection of God, and in every detail.” And here is the response, again according to Boso: “When this message had been heard in public the kindly Pope with a joyful and calm appearance replied: ‘We rejoice at your arrival and the happy tidings that you bring, and for these reasons give thanks to God Almighty. In the visible world there is no message that falls so sweetly upon our ears as the news that the Emperor, your lord, whom we recognize as first amongst the princes of the world, wishes, as you declare, to give us true peace. But if he wishes to give us and the Roman Church full peace, he must grant it also to all our allies, and in particular to the King of Sicily, the Lombards, and to the Emperor in Constantinople, who stood unshakeably with us during the trials of the Church.’ The envoys both assented to and praised this speech of the Pontiff Pope” unquote

Agnani Papal Palace

Negotiations lasted 2 weeks and were conducted in secret. In the final document that emerged the empire conceded to almost every one of Alexander’s demands.

Barbarossa, his wife and his son Henry accept Alexander III as the one and only true pope and promise to show him the reverence due to him. There are no specifics set out how that reverence is to be shown.

The bulk of the agreement is taken up with the resolution of temporal matters, i.e, what the pope owns and what the emperor has to return to him..

In particular Barbarossa is to return all the papal regalia that the Holy church held during the reign of Innocent II, which is another way of saying that Barbarossa had to drop the Roman Commune and return the title of prefect of Rome he had taken in 1167. That made the pope again the sovereign ruler of Rome, assuming he can dislodge the Senate.

Further the Lands of Matilda were to go back to the pope as were all the lands and property of any church the emperor may have acquired during the schism.

Finally reconciliation with the papacy was conditional upon the conclusion of peace agreements with the Lombards, the King of Sicily and emperor Manuel.

This looks like a clean sweep for the papacy, though there were a few things that the imperial negotiators managed to obtain. They obtained the recognition of the archbishops Christian of Mainz and Phillip of Cologne. Both Christian and Philipp had been installed by the antipopes or a bishop installed by an antipope. Alexander had appointed his own archbishop of Mainz, Conrad. The deal they came up with was that Conrad would give up Mainz but would be first in line for the next vacant archbishopric. Christian would publicly burn the pallium, the symbol of his office that he had received from anti pope Paschalis III and receive a new one from Alexander III.

Phillipp v. Heinsberg grave in the cathedral of Cologne

This was a pragmatic and ultimately inevitable solution. Completely unwinding a schism would be catastrophic. Imagine every ordination by a schismatic bishop was declared invalid, at which point the sacraments of the priests so ordained would also be invalid. And that in turn means that anyone who say had been baptised by a schismatic priest and later died would end up in purgatory through no fault of their own. That could not be and as we have seen in previous schism, most of the schismatic bishops and priests remained and their sacraments were considered valid. Hence this was a concession, but not a major one.

The pope also promised to crown the empress Beatrice, which was even less of a concession since it it only worked if Barbarossa had gained control of Rome for the pope first. This being a challenge,  all it meant was that by inference the previous coronation of Beatrice was now invalid.

One part of the imperial negotiation strategy had been to conclude a final peace agreement with Alexander, which is why the envoys had unlimited power to bind the emperor. A final peace with the pope would have split the anti-imperial coalition. But they did not get that. Angnani was only a preliminary settlement, subject to a broader peace agreement that included the Lombard League, William of Sicily, and emperor Manuel. These peace agreements should be negotiated again by each party appointing arbiters. Until this peace was finally concluded, Barbarossa was to observe a truce with all parties.

The preliminary accord of Agnani was not far short of an unconditional surrender. It shows either how desperate Barbarossa’s position had become or how keen the bishops were to remove the shadow of deposition.

Just to lighten the mood, there is a human-interest story here as well. Both pope Alexander and Barbarossa praise the efforts of several Carthusian monks in bringing about peace, without explaining in detail what they had done. Cardinal Boso, who was present at the negotiations does not mention them at all. But they must have somehow be involved.  Now one of them was Dietrich of Silve-Benite. He pops up at the most unexpected junctures. He was there when Barbarossa fled across Mont Cenis in 1168 and he is again on hand at this difficult point in Barbarossa’s life doing who knows what. He will be involved in the upcoming negotiations as well, which is very unusual for a member of the Carthusian order, an order that vows to live a life of silence, solitude and prayer. Carthusians are normally prohibited from receiving guests, meeting people outside their monastery and even  seeing their family more than once a year. How come that Dietrich of Silve-Benite is there, at one of the largest political gatherings of his time.  Barbarossa himself  gives a hint when he calls him „sprouted from our lineage“ and Dietrich calls himself „ of the house and lineage of the great Frederick“. In other words he was most likely Barbarossa’s natural son, born to an unknown mother in the 1140s. It is one of those bewildering things about Barbarossa that we hear nothing about any premarital or extramarital relationships. In fact, except for Henry IV and then later Frederick II, these medieval emperors were an exceedingly chaste bunch. Contemporary French kings are famous for their excessive piety and sexual incontinence – none of that in the chronicles of these monarchs. I find that very hard to believe, in particular with Barbarossa who was unmarried for a period during his late 20s and apparently was later quite infatuated with his very beautiful wife Beatrix of Burgundy.

Marriage of Frederick Barbarossa and beatrix of Burgundy, as imagined by Tintoretto

Moving on from potential sexual frustration to actual deep political frustration. The news of some sort of agreement between the pope and emperor leads to anxiety amongst the Lombards who fear that they have been left out of the peace agreement. The most anxious of all of them are the Cremonese whose position within the League is already extremely precarious and hence needs imperial support. They invite Barbarossa to stay with them and even promise him to accompany him to the Lands of Matilda. Why Barbarossa accepts that invitation is a bit unclear. It may well be that even the rich city of Pavia has run out of patience feeding the imperial entourage. Anyway, by December 1176 we find Barbarossa in the monastery of S. Agata in Cremona.

Having secured the emperor, the Cremonese come up with ever more audacious schemes. First they dig up the long superseded peace of Montebello that had made them the mediators between the League and the emperor. Based on that they issue a second mediation award which is largely identical to the first one but guarantees the existence of Alessandria. That did backfire both ways as the Lombards were expecting more, and the imperials still cannot stomach the existence of Alessandria.

This being a lead balloon they try something else. The way the Cremonese tell the story, they had received the emperor with all the honours due to his rank and in exchange, Barbarossa had promised to protect the city should they fall out with the League. Barbarossa was to send 1000 German knights for the defence of Cremona.

Barbarossa will later blame Cremona for all the misfortunes he had experienced in Italy since 1155. As for 1177, he says the Cremonese did not provide as much as loaf of bread for the upkeep of his entourage. Instead, they harassed and harangued the effectively defenceless emperor. They demand the transfer of two important castles, Guastella and Luzzara, threatening to kill him. Only by God’s grace did he manage to escape from Cremona without signing any of these charters, even though his frightened princes urged him to grant them all they wanted. That old alliance between Cremona and the empire is broken.

Barbarossa then begins an itineration around central Italy where he can be found in Modena, Pesaro, Ravenna waiting for the final peace negotiations to begin.

What looked like a smooth process in Agnani turns out to be a lot more complex in reality. The fractious Lombard League sees conspiracies everywhere. Yes, the pope has sworn that he had not signed a binding peace with the emperor, but can they really believe this. Cremona and Tortona have left the League and sided with the emperor. What do they know?

All the paranoia culminates in the question where to hold these four-way negotiations.

In Agnani the parties had agreed Ravenna as the location. But the Lombard League bans any bishops from crossing their territory en route to Ravenna. With Ravenna out, Bologna is suggested, but that does not work for the imperials who had besieged Bologna recently and feared to be lynched when they come into town. Venice was the next suggestion, but the Lombards were opposed because Venice had helped Christian of Mainz to besiege Ancona in violation of the league treaty. Sounds complex, it is.

In the end the Pope, William of Sicily and Barbarossa agree on Venice and the Doge of Venice promises the Lombards that Barbarossa would not be allowed in the city until the peace is concluded. That reassures the Lombards in so far as Barbarossa will not be able to use his prestige and personal charm to influence the outcomes.

And so for the next couple of months Barbarossa wonders about central Italy whilst his destiny is decided in the Serenissima. It could be worse. Emperor Manuel had been unceremoniously dropped from the proceedings after his devastating defeat against the Turks at Myriokephalon. And again, if you want to hear this story from the other side of the Mediterranean, check out episode 244 of the history of Byzantium.

With that the first international peace congress in Europe gets under way. One source claims 8,400 participants had taken part and names some 5000 by name, the crème de la crème of Europe, each trying to outshine the other.  The archbishop of Cologne comes with 400 secretaries, chaplains and attendants, the patriarch of Aquileia has 300, as did Mainz and Magdeburg, count roger of Andria, representing the king of Sicily came with an entourage of 330, duke Leopold of Austria could only muster a paltry 160 knights and attendants..

Pope Alexander III arrives on May 10th 1177 and is offered the palace of the patriarch in San Silvestro, a building that must have been very large and impressive but is almost completely lost today. It is inside the patriarchal chapel of this building that negotiations for a lasting peace took place.

All that is left of the Ca de papa, the house of the Pope

Pope Alexander was in charge of proceedings and proposed that first item on the agenda should be the peace between the emperor and the Lombard League. The two items that needed to be resolved were the Imperial regalia, i.e, the rights and privileges the emperor held in Northern Italy and the status of Alessandria. The imperial side began by offering options. Option one was the acceptance of the laws of Roncaglia and option two was to retore imperial control to what it was under king Henry IV. Option one was immediately dismissed, leaving option 2.

The counterproposal from the League was the rights and privileges as they existed under Henry V.

That does not sound like a massive gap since Henry IV had spent half his reign wondering around Italy begging cities for help. But that is something we know. The negotiators in 1177 had no idea what rights and privileges Henry IV or Henry V for that matter actually enjoyed. It was an elaborate form of shadow boxing with two blindfolded fighters. And there was also no compromise visible for Alessandria.

After a couple of weeks of to and fro, Pope Alexander decided that all this was just too complex to resolve within the timeframe of the congress. Hence he proposed a six year truce with the Lombard League and a 15 year truce with the Sicilians. And the agreement of Agnani should be incorporated into this treaty in full.

When his negotiators brought the proposal to Barbarossa he threw a full blown tantrum. He did not want a truce. The reason he did not want a truce was optics, nothing else. Barbarossa knew that when the treaty will be concluded, he will have to go to Venice and pay homage to the pope. If a treaty could be concluded with the Lombards, they would then have to repeat the procedure at Montebello, i.e, kneel before the emperor with their swords pointing at their hearts before receiving the kiss of peace. That way both the pope and the emperor would be able to stage their honour and prestige before the eyes of all of Europe.

We have to remember that the medieval public never saw the treaties and agreements that underpinned the peace. All they see is the way the peace is staged. Who kneels to who, how deep, with or without shoes, wearing which clothes. And what they see is what they will tell their friends at home about. And that becomes the political reality, irrespective of whatever concessions have been made.

Hence it made sense for Barbarossa to get upset about the truce. But what could he do. He did contemplate to go to Venice himself, against the explicit order of the pope and the doge and try to sway the negotiations. But that would only have resulted in a break-up of the peace congress and resumption of hostilities. That was something the German princes would not let him do.

But he needed to be granted something and it may be that the representatives of France and England put some pressure on Alexander III to get this over the line. So Pope Alexander allowed Barbarossa to keep the Lands of Matilda for another fifteen years, essentially until such time as the truce with William of Sicily was to run. These two things may have nothing to do with each other, but it sounded somewhat neat.

And that was it. On July 22nd the delegates signed the final draft. It was a rickety arrangement that left pretty much everyone disappointed. Milan and other members of the league felt betrayed by Pope Alexander, the pope may be regretting the handover of the Lands of Matilda, but worse off was Barbarossa who was dreading what was coming now.

We let Cardinal Boso take it from here:

Quote: “And so when these matters had been brought to completion in this way, the Pontiff released the Doge and the people of Venice from the oath which bound them, and instructed them to escort the Lord Emperor with due ceremony into their city. The Doge hastened to fulfil this instruction, and with due honours and ceremony brought the Emperor to the monastery of St. Nicholas on the Lido in six galleys which he had made ready. On the following day on the Vigil of St. James, when morning was at its height, the Pope sent to the Emperor the Bishops of Ostia, Porto and Praeneste, [Hu., G., and M., with I., Cardinal Priest of the title of Santa Anastasia; T., Cardinal Priest of the title of Santa Vitalia; P., Cardinal Priest of the title of Santa Susanna, and I., Cardinal Deacon of the title of St. Mary in Cosmidin.] They came into the presence of the Emperor, and after he had renounced the Schism of Octavian, Guy of Crema, and John of Strumi,[these were the antipopes]  and promised obedience to the venerable Pope Alexander as to the first Person in Christendom and to his successors who would enter on their office according to the canon. Upon that they absolved him from the sentence of excommunication that had been passed upon him and made him once more Part of the unity of the Catholic Church. Some of the more important Princes of his Empire made the Same renunciation according to the ancient custom of the Church.

 Thereupon the Emperor, like the orthodox prince that he now was, approached the presence of the Same Pontiff, who was enthroned with his Archbishops, Bishops, and Cardinals before the doors of St. Mark’s; and in the sight of all who awaited the benefit of the peace he put off his cloak and bowed down to the ground, and after kissing the Pope’s feet just as if they were those of the first of the Apostles, in verity he most devoutly administered the kiss of peace to him. Then were all filled with great joy, and from the excess of their $adness the sound of their chanting of the Te Deum rose up to the skies. But the august monarch, taking the Pontiff by his right hand, and amid chants and hymns of praise led him to the choir of the church, and there reverently received with bowed head the blessing from his hand.”

(Venice) Il Barbarossa bacia il piede al Papa – Federico Zuccari – Sala del Maggior Consiglio

On the next day, the feast of St. James the Apostle, the Pope returned to the Same church, and being about to celebrate the rites of the Mass with a joyous procession of Patriarchs, Cardinals, Bishops, Priests, and Deacons and the other orders of the Church, he drew near to the altar. The Emperor took his place in the choir, and the German clergy began in clear voices to chant the Introit of the Mass, and with all jubiliation carried out the whole chanting of the service. After the Gospel and the homily, the Emperor once again, together with his Princes, bowed down in a most devout fashion, opened his treasures and, after kissing Alexander’s feet, made him an offering of gold. When the Mass had been celebrated, Frederick took the Pontiff by the right hand and conducted him outside to his white horse and held his stirrup with a strong grip. But when he took the reins and made as if to carry out the duties of a marshal, the Pope accepted in his loving manner the intention for the deed, since the journey to the sea seemed to him to be rather long. End quote

Barbarossa will remain in Venice until September 17th, almost 6 weeks regularly meeting Pope Alexander and kissing his feet. The peace agreement is re-signed again and again, and princes are made to deliver oaths on it again and again. The emperor finally receives papal permission to leave.

As always with German history, the significance of the events of the peace of Venice are heavily disputed.

Let’s start with the first observation, there is no contemporary source from Germany that describes the events in front of the church of San Marco. About 50 years after these events a German monk tells the story that Count Dietrich of Lusatia had intervened when Pope Alexander had hesitated to raise the emperor from his prostration suggesting that the submission to the pope was considered humiliating to Barbarossa. Things got worse when papal propaganda in the 13th century embellished events. Thomas of Pavia, a Franciscan Monk reported that Pope Alexander had put his foot on Barbarossa‘s neck and quoted Psalm 91.13  “Thou shalt walk upon the asp and the basilisk: and thou shalt trample under foot the lion and the dragon.”

Protestant propaganda from teh 16th century

By the late Middle Ages the image of the emperor kneeling before an imperious pope had become the central memory of the peace of Venice. During the Reformation the image of the pope putting his foot on the neck of the German ruler played a major role in anti-papal propaganda. In 1617 a German paster wondered why no honest German man had shown the heroic effort to plunge a dagger into the heart of this son of a dot,dot,dot pope Alexander.

The story turned in the 19th century. This image of the mythical hero Barbarossa being humiliated was simply impossible to swallow. One Canossa was enough. Hence historians began weaving a sophisticated net or arguments that Knut Goerich called a second historical reality. In that reality, Barbarossa was a superior negotiator who managed to turn the military defeat into an ultimately manageable result. The kneeling before the pope and strator service weren’t a humiliation, but no more than the usual reference to be granted the pope.

The pendulum has now swung back and many contemporaries see Venice as the final submission of the imperial dream under the triumphant papacy. Best quote is “Canossa lasted just 3 days but the degradation before Alexander III went on for a 100 days”.

Do I have an opinion? Sure I do. The emperor prostrating himself before the pope is showing to everyone publicly that he is recognising the papal authority and accepts that the pope is superior. This is the end of the idea that the empire and the emperor is equal in rank and independent from the recognition by the pope.

But I also think that Venice was ultimately a decent, if not actually a good deal for the Hohenstaufen. Whether that was due to Barbarossa’s negotiation skills or the more realistic perspective of his princes, mainly of Christian of Mainz does not realty matter. Barbarossa can retain some level of influence over Northern Italy and gains more room to manoeuvre now he is no longer excommunicated.

But it goes beyond that. Venice is a hugely important event. The concept of the Holy Roman Empire as conceived initially by Rainald von Dassel and Barbarossa that is now dead. The name remains but underneath is now Plan B. And plan B is building dynastic power. Once Barbarossa is back in Germany, he will continue his aggressive policy of territorial expansion. As he does that, he no longer has any moral authority to stop the other princes from pursuing the same strategy. It started before but after 1177 the big carving up of the empire goes into overdrive. Aristocratic families who have gained a leading position such as the House of Welf, the Luxembourgs, the Wittelsbach, the Wetting and the Askanier will dominate for the next centuries and those who have not yet moved into the top tier like the Habsburgs and Hohenzollern have only another few decades  to get into the game..

As for Italy, the truce with the Lombard league will lead to a more sustained peace 6 years later, a peace that will completely rejig the alliances, turning Milan from foe to friend.. But the most significant dynastic impact results from the truce with Siciliy. How that happened is going to be the subject of next weeks episode. I hope to see you then.

Lastly, let me thank all of you who are supporting the show, in particular the Patrons who have kindly signed up on patron.com/historyofthegermans. It is thanks to you this show does not have to start with me endorsing mattresses or meal kits.. If Patreon isn’t for you, another way to help the show is sharing the podcast directly or boosting its recognition on social media. If you share, comment or retweet a post from the History of the Germans it is more likely to be seen by others, hence bringing in more listeners. My most active places are Twitter @germanshistory and my Facebook page History of the Germans Podcast. All the links are in the shownotes.  

Barbarossa’s final defeat in Italy

This week we talk about the next leg in this the fifth Italian campaign Barbarossa undertakes. It involves an aborted battle, attempts at peace, a mediation award, a refusal of support and the most significant battle of not just his reign but one that reverberates into the present day.

Transcript

Hello and Welcome to the History of the Germans, Episode 60 – Legnano

This week we talk about the next leg in this the fifth Italian campaign Barbarossa undertakes. It involves an aborted battle, attempts at peace, a mediation award, a refusal of support and the most significant battle of not just his reign but one that reverberates into the present day.

Before we start just a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. And thanks a lot to Gary, Wesley and Randolph who have already signed up.

Last week we ended with Barbarossa abandoning the siege of Alessandria. Leaving behind the burning ambers of his exceedingly expensive siege engines and the graves of the soldiers who had burned to death inside them, he headed back to Pavia to lick his wounds.

Going back to Pavia is all fine, but not a way to defeat the Lombard league. The Lombard League that Barbarossa is up against in 1176 had evolved quite a bit from the purely defensive alliance formed in 1167. You remember that in 1167 the Lombard cities came together to protect each other against the ever-increasing imperial demands for taxes, soldiers and ultimate direct control of the cities. Its members had been archenemies who had been tied up in incessant internal fighting ever since the communes had been created in the 11th century. But the resistance against the laws of Roncaglia had unified them. They even worked together to resurrect Milan, the previous hegemon of Lombardy that had razed many of its fellow league members to the ground before.

White bit is Pavia!

What is most remarkable is that the Lombard League did not fall apart after Barbarossa had fled across the alps having lost his army and his allies in Italy. For six years he was brooding beyond the alps, but six years is a long time in politics.

Instead of falling apart, the Lombard league firmed up even more and developed its own institutions. The league was led by two rectors whose role it was to coordinate league activities and act as commanders in war. The League also resolved disputes between its members, for instance over property and control of territory. As time went by the League became a customs union abolishing all tolls and customs duties between the cities. The League was certainly not a state had become a political entity in its own right.

At its heart however the League was first and foremost a pledge of mutual support. An attack on one member was an attack on all and all members of the league were required to bring relief.

And that is happening now. The League army was  on its way to relieve Alessandria. Let’s take the story up with Cardinal Boso who wrote, quote: in the dawn of Easter Sunday he (Barbarossa that is) made his way with all his men towards Pavia. But since he could not avoid cutting across the Lombard army’s lines, he wanted to encamp near the Lombards in the village which is known as Santa Giulietta. He did not fear that he would be attacked by them, unless he himself provoked them to battle. The Lombards had not yet discovered what Almighty God had on the previous day wrought with the aid of Alessandria. When they saw Frederick coming against them with flying standards, they took up arms and manfully stood there in armour before him, prepared to do battle. But at first, they were watching what he would decide to do, whether he would start to fight (which seemed unlikely because he had much fewer men than they had) or whether he would set up camp peacefully and harm nobody.  End quote

On easter Sunday the two armies were still three miles apart near the town of Montebello. Then the Lombard cities brought their men and their great Carrioccos, the enormous war carts that symbolised the cities freedom and honour across the little rive that separated the armies. Barbarossa for his part also moved closer.

That gradual approach showed how little eagerness either side had for the battle. Barbarossa knew that his army was still demoralised from the failure to take Alessandria, the desertions and the utter misery of its muddy winter camp. But the Lombards themselves weren’t sure they want to go up against one of Europe’s most successful generals either. Even though Barbarossa had lost his great army before Rome, that had not been due to a military defeat, but due to disease. So far Barbarossa had a clean sheet on the field of battle. And there must be in the back of their minds the thought about the downside risk for the league. If the joint army were to be beaten, how long before the old imperial allies, Cremona, Lodi, Bergamo, Como, Vercelli, Novara sink back into the warm embrace of their Holy sovereign?

It was time for cooler heads to prevail. Communication lines were opened by the Malaspina family, whose patriarch was in the League’s camp whilst his son served the emperor. This is one of the earlier incidents of the kinds of split bets many Italian families made to preserve their wealth and position during the rolling waves of invasions over the next couple of centuries.

Inside the Castello Malaspina in Fosdinovo – now a guest house: https://www.castellodifosdinovo.it/en/

With channels opened, the parties met to hammer out a deal. On the imperial side the legation consisted of the usual sea of bishops led by Philipp of Cologne, Conrad Count Palatinate and the inevitable Otto von Wittelsbach. On the Lombard side there were one representative each of the 15 cities of the league plus the two rectors and commanders of the Leagues’ army, Anselmo da Dovara and Ezzelino Romano. That makes 17 negotiators on one side and ~7 on the other. And what they were to agree upon was detailed, complex, and contentious, in essence the rights and privileges of the emperor in Italy.

The imperial position is that the laws of Roncaglia go back to Ancient Rome and are eternal and unaffected by recent events. Hence the emperor has all the rights listed at the time by the four great lawyers. And anyway, as the fountain of all laws and jurisdiction, he can impose new obligations if he so chooses.

The communal side is happy to pay this emperor what they had paid the emperor Henry V, last of the Salian rulers. Since nobody really remembered any details of Henry V’s reign nor the exact set of obligations they had towards him, the bottom line was that they wanted to go back to the days of absentee imperial overlordship and were prepared to give the emperor a nickel a year.

Big gap to bridge and very little time. Hence instead of aiming high and going for a permanent peace treaty, they agreed on a procedure by which a peace treaty should be arrived at. That procedure consisted in two steps. First a committee made up of three members from each side would negotiate a settlement. Where agreement cannot be reached, the disputed issue would be brought to the consuls of Cremona for a binding mediation award.

Why Cremona? Cremona had not sent troops against the emperor in Alessandria and had been the closest imperial ally in Italy after Pavia. On the other hand, Cremona was still a member of the Lombard League. All that made them closest thing to a neutral party in the whole of Italy. Normally this job would have gone to the pope, but Pope Alexander was no neutral party at all but firmly in the League‘s camp.

Though all that had been agreed was a truce and a route towards an agreement, both sides wanted to enact the formal ceremony as if an actual peace agreement had been concluded. And that involved two things. The Italian communes would submit to the emperor so he could re-admit them back into his grace. The emperor on the other hand had would grant not just the city representatives, but also the two rectors of the Lombard league the kiss of peace.

It is obvious why Barbarossa wanted the first part. After the setback before Alessandria, he needed something that restored the honour and standing of the empire. What could be better than having the leaders of the Lombard League kneeling before him with their swords pointing at their hearts asking for forgiveness.

Why are the Lombards prepared to give him that just for the kiss of peace? By granting the kiss of peace to the two rectors in their capacity as representatives of the Lombard league, the empire formally recognises its existence. Before the kiss of peace in the eyes of the world, the league was an agreement between several communes, but after the kiss it was an institution in its own right recognised by the emperor. It is a bit like when separatist movements are asking for diplomatic recognition for their new political entity. That, they thought was worth kneeling for. And this time they could probably have a cushion for their weary knees and can keep their shoes on.

Kiss of peace

Having gone through the motions, both sides dismissed their armies. The mercenaries returned to their homes in Brabant, plundering and steeling along the way. The Carrioccos carrying the cities’ pride and honour rattled home on what had remained of the roman road network of antiquity

And they lived happily ever after….ah, no, they didn’t. Come on, this is the History of the Germans. No way we go home without some decent bloodshed, tragedy and humiliation.

As every marriage counsellor knows, going through the kiss and make up stuff before you have resolved the underlying issue may result in a great night, but you still wake up with the same headache. And one headache was even more searing than taxes, jurisdictions, Roman law, podestas, or regalia, and that was the wretched city of Alessandria.

Alessandria’s mere existence was an insult to imperial dignity. Alessandria has to go. Non-negotiable said the three imperial representatives. 

Alessandria is a city, a creation and a full member of the Lombard League. Alessandria has to remain. Non-negotiable said the three representatives of the communes.

From then on the discussions are split into the general negotiations and the “issue of Alessandria” that is passed on to the consuls of Cremona.

And the consuls of Cremona decide – dramatic pause – for Alessandria to be dismantled. If you have asked yourself these last 10 episodes, why have I never heard much about Cremona before, apart from it being a great musical centre and the home of the greatest violin makers like Amati, Rugeri, Guameri and Stradivari? The answer is right here. When Cremona sided with Barbarossa, the other members of the Lombard league are apoplectic. Never again will they trust Cremona and though Cremona remains a member of the league for some time longer, it’s influence is much diminished. And they did not even get their pay out for changing sides. The Germans too see the award as  a case of Italian falsehood and duplicity, a prejudice that takes hold in this period and persists until today.

Cremona – worth going

Objectively Cremona had good reason to side with Barbarossa. Milan had become ever more powerful within the league and Cremona was getting uncomfortable. Rebuilding bridges with the emperor would help them secure their gains, basically the land that used to be the city of Crema. Rational it was, yes, politically astute, not at all.

Though both parties had agreed they would respect the award by the consuls of Cremona irrespective of outcome, neither side seemed to have intended to do it after all. The representatives of the league are said to have torn the award charter to shreds. Barbarossa on the other hand was gathering troops to flatten Alessandria even before the award had come through.

With the award granting him the right to raze Alessandria to the ground, Barbarossa went to work. He secured help from Pisa and Genoa and even convinced Tortona to leave the League and join the imperial side. Remember that Barbarossa had besieged and destroyed Tortona in 1155 by poisoning their wells. Another „not his finest hour“ moments. But the people of Tortona were prepared to let bygones be bygones if only the emperor could get rid of Alessandria whose competition was beginning to impact Tortona’s trade.

Another piece of good news comes from the south where Archbishop Christian of Mainz had been waging war across Tuscany and the papal states. In Early 1176  he managed to defeat a Sicilian army that was on its way to strengthen the League’s hand. 

But if he wanted to put serious pressure on the league and regain more than the most basic regalia in Italy, he needed to raise an army in Germany. He had sent Philipp archbishop of Cologne and one of his closest advisors across the alps to bring him fresh troops. Philipp found this hard going. The secular princes apart from absolute Barbarossa loyalists pointed to all the losses in men and material they had already suffered and refused. This being the fifth campaign, there was no longer any feudal obligation to come across and help. All that Philipp could muster was probably 1,000 to 2,000 knights, mainly from bishoprics subordinate to Cologne and Magdeburg.

In the meantime, Barbarossa had broken another city out of the Lombard league, Como. The defection of Como was a major coup because Como controlled the entry to several crucial alpine passes. Not having to go around the long way via Burgundy and Savoy dramatically increased the ability to bring down reinforcements. It also meant that communication with Germany improved dramatically. Realising the German lay princes would not send reinforcements on the scale necessary to achieve any of his objectives, he redoubled his efforts to convince them and leant especially  heavily on Henry the Lion to send help.

Como is at the end of St. Gotthard and San Bernardino passes as well as several others

Now the next bit is heavily disputed, but on balance probably true.

In February 1176 Barbarossa meets with Henry the Lion in person, most probably in the small town of Chiavenna halfway between Italy and Germany. Barbarossa begs Henry to provide him with an army and even prostrates himself before the duke. We have encountered this act before. Henry II prostrated himself before his bishops to force the creation of the bishopric of Bamberg, Emperor Conrad II prostrated himself before his son, Henry III to gain support in his deposition of the duke of Carinthia. Imperial prostration is an act of last resort. It was impossible to refuse someone of superior rank who had so humiliated himself. Refusal would turn the pretend humiliation into a real one. If rejected, the pleading emperor‘s honour does not leave any other option than lethal revenge. Henry the Lion must know this but still refuses the request.

Barbarossa Kneeeling before Henry the Lioon (14th century image)

Before we go to the consequences of this act, the first question is why he would do that. It sounds like madness. As we heard last episode and several times before, the mutual support between Henry the Lion and Barbarossa was not only the capstone of the imperial peace but also enormously beneficial to Henry. Henry had become duke of Bavaria thanks to Barbarossa’s efforts, and he had enjoyed imperial support in establishing king-like power in Saxony. Inviting the wrath of the emperor would give and will give support to his enemies and undermines his position. The relationship had soured a bit when Barbarossa made moves on the lands of Henry’s uncle, Welf VI and other minor inheritance dispute, but that is business as usual.

Some historians argue Henry the Lion had been afraid that he may die in Italy as so many others had in 1167. His son and heir was still a child and he remembered how the House of Welf had lost so much of its position during his own infancy. Moreover his wife Matilda was also still young and a foreigner making her regency even more precarious. But that is not a valid reason to refuse a supplicant ruler by any stretch. So maybe he believed Frederick would perish in Italy before he could take revenge on him.

The alternative explanation is that the two had met and Barbarossa never fell to his knees but they had a straightforward conversation in which Henry the Lion pointed out that he was under no further feudal obligation to come along. And by the way these Italian campaigns are completely useless. The best value for money was to go east, massacre some Slavs, take their lands and religion and make it your own.

And finally there is the possibility that the meeting never happened, as many have argued.

Whether or not it happened or how it happened, the story of the emperor begging his duke for help in vain was repeated and reproduced a thousand times and became part of the Welf versus Hohenstaufen, the Guelph versus Ghibelline narrative, blaming Henry the Lion for what happens next.

Barbarossa is back in Pavia in February and plans his campaign. Item 1 on the grand strategic plan is to consolidate his forces. He has some troops in Pavia, there are the German reinforcements -such as they are- coming down via Como, the Margrave of Montferrato has promised an army and Christian of Mainz is on his way back North from his victory over the Sicilians. Plus the main strategic objective for 1176 was again Alessandria, which meant Pavia was a logical rallying point.

To reach Pavia the German reinforcements had to travel through Milanese Territory. Barbarossa decided to meet them as soon as they had come across the height of the passes and guide them down to Pavia. To get to Como, he first had to go through that same enemy territory himself. He decided to move fast and travelled light, accompanied only by about 500 to 1,000 knights with no baggage and no infantry. When the Milanese heard reports of the emperor travelling through their lands at the double, they dismissed them as obviously false and made no efforts to impede his progress.

Barbarossa meets his fresh troops in Serravalle in the Blenio valley, today in the Kanton Ticino in Switzerland. The combined forces of the fresh troops, Barbarossa’s companions and some men from Como, in total about 3,000 knights, set off for Pavia sometime after May 12th. From Como the plan is to go in an almost straight line Southwest to cross the Ticino river into Pavese territory. On May 28th the Imperial army takes a rest in Cairate. They expect to cross the Ticino river the next day.

Meanwhile in Milan the realisation had sunk in that Barbarossa had indeed crossed their lands north to pick up his brand-new army and would soon come back the same route. Given the element of surprise the League army had not yet assembled. Orders were sent to all the league cities to send troops but only the knights of horseback from Piacenza, Brescia, Novara, Vercelli, Lodi had arrived. The Lombards had to make a decision. Either letting the emperor pass and attack him later when the full contingents of the league were assembled, or to attack him now with what they had to prevent the imperial army from consolidating.

The Milanese decided to go ahead and intercept the Germans. The same day Barbarossa rests in Cairate, they set up camp near the town of Legnano, a place the imperial army was likely to come through on their route down.

They had brought their great Carrocio, the enormous war wagon that the Italian communes used as its banner and rallying point. Just to recap, this was a war cart drawn by oxen. It carried a platform that may have been as long as 15 meters and maybe 4 to 5 meters wide. On the platform that was covered in scarlet cloth stood an altar, a flagpole and in the case of Milan an enormous cross. A cross so large it took four men to put it upright. A priest would celebrate mass on the platform before battle and during the fighting trumpeters would stand on the Carrocio giving signals for attack and retreat. But most importantly, the Carrocio was the symbol of civic pride. Capturing the Carrocio meant victory and eternal shame for the defeated side. Captured Carioca would be displayed in the victorious cities. The cathedral of Siena still holds two oak bars from a Carioca captured from the Florentines. Cremona famously hung the trousers of defeated enemies from the ceiling of its cathedral.

Carrocio of Milan

An important feature of the Carrocio was that it moved very slowly forcing the citizens into a last stand around the Carrocio. The other advantage was that the carrocio was hard to overturn, so other than a bannerman, its flagpole rarely vanished before the battle ended.

This pride of the Milanese was positioned on the slope of a hill near the town of Legnano, overlooking the River Olona. The Milanese had maybe 12,000 men, mostly citizen soldiers on foot plus the couple of hundred knights on horseback that had come from the allied cities.

On the morning of May 29th these knights were out on a recce, thinking Barbarossa was still hundreds of miles away when they came across a detachment of 300 German knights. The Italians, numbering about 700 gave chase thinking these Germans were on their own and had blundered into Milanese territory by mistake. The Germans feigned retreat and lured them toward their comrades. The Italians were mightily surprised when 2000 of Barbarossa’s knights appeared over the hill. Now it was the German’s time to give chase and the Italian cavalry started running and running, barely stopping before they reached Milan. That left the Milanese foot soldiers near their immovable Carrocio without cavalry support.

Shortly after that Barbarossa got to Legnano where he found the the Milanese army camped across his path home. 12,000 men to his 3,000, lances and shields glinting in the sun, trumpets sounding, flags flying from the great Carracio.. If he had thought of turning back to Como, it has not been recorded. Most likely the idea did not even cross his mind. These Milanese infantrymen are no more than armed peasants, no match for his army of highly trained armoured killing machines. And let’s not forget that imperial prestige was already badly dinted thanks to the embarrassment of Alessandria and the abandoned battle at Montebello. Retreat was inconceivable.

The Milanese arranged their lines were four men deep in a semicircle around the Carrocio. The first row was kneeling behind their shields holding a 2m long lance. The next line was standing holding the shield before their chest and again pointing the long lance at the enemy. The third and fourth line held the back and swapped forward should the first have fallen. It was not exactly a classic Greek phalanx, but something not too dissimilar. And there were more similarities to the ancient Polis. The contingents were organised by city, borough and neighbourhood. Neighbour stood by neighbour, brother with brother, fathers next to sons. No way you could ever go back home if you had failed your friends and family in battle or worse, run away from the enemy.

Against them stood the German knights who had built a terrifying reputation amongst the Italians both for their military prowess and their cruelty. A charge of this heavy cavalry with their  shiny armour, lances out, mounted on their enormous warhorse must have been a terrifying sight to behold. More often than not the enemy foot soldiers ran even before the lances had made contact. In fact that was their main military purpose, breaking the infantry through fear and subsequently engage the enemy‘s cavalry.

Barbarossa arranged his cavalry against the Milanese positions and ordered his men to charge. And they galloped into a veritable forest of steel pikes.  The Milanese held the line. They were fighting for the continued existence of their city that Barbarossa had destroyed and empties 14 years before. They rather died than letting this happen again. Most of the knights stopped their horses when they saw that the line of death would not break. They turned round to do the same again half an hour later. Some could not rein in their horses or did not want to halt and were promptly thrown off, their armour pierced by the Milanese lances and their throats cut. One of those who failed to stop was the imperial bannerman whose fall took away the army’s focal point. Instead, they now looked towards the emperor himself whose shining armour could be seen from far and wide. As the Milanese lines refused to yield to the intimidating charges many knights dismounted and tried to hack their way to the carrocio on foot. These efforts were more successful and gradually the Germans pushed ahead whilst the Milanese massed around the symbol of their civic pride. Barbarossa was in the midst of the fighting spurring his men on to bring down that damned cart.

Do you remember the Italian knights on horseback that fled all the way to Milan? Milan was not that far away and when they encountered further reinforcements on their way towards Legnano, the knights were shamed into returning to the place of battle. When they arrived, they saw the lines of the Milanese still barely holding but the Germans off their horses and vulnerable on their flanks. They fell on them. Barbarossa disappeared in the fighting. His army deprived of their leader and focal point broke and ran. The Italians chased them all the way to the Ticino River which some crossed but many drowned.

News of the defeat reached Pavia the next day. When no news of Barbarossa’s whereabouts came for days, empress Beatrix put on her widow’s veil and mass was said for the dead emperor. But on day 7 he returned. His armour, lance sword and banner had been captured by the enemy, but the man escaped. The Milanese took thousands of prisoners, returned the German knights for ransom and made the men of Como who had come along suffer for months.

Milanese soldiers searching for Barbarossa’s body (postcard from 1913)

Was Barbarossa beaten militarily? Probably not completely. A part of his defeated army had made it down after all and he still had the allied forces of Pavia and Montferrrato. But his grand project was psychologically and politically broken. The destruction of his army before Rome, the failed siege of Alessandria and now the defeat of Legnano was seen as fate or god putting an end to these ambitions.

Legnano was a turning point in German, but even more in Italian history. There will now not be an absolutist imperial rule in Northern Italy. Instead, the communes will enjoy a century and a half of self-determination, endless fighting both internally and externally before they will fall one by one under the rule of a single man, sometimes a member of the great local families, sometimes a chancer from elsewhere before finally coming under the domination of a duke or count or pope. This constant competition and oneupmanship  spurred them on to create some of the greatest works of art and architecture the world has ever seen.

The Lombard league and the battle of Legnano formed the key element of a national narrative for the Italian people during the Risorgimento, the movement to create a unified Italy in the 19th century. The legendary success against an overbearing German emperor was a great parallel to the struggle with the Austrian imperial hegemony.  

Verdi wrote an opera about Legnano

At the same time Legnano gained a mythical “what if” significance in the German national narrative of the 19th century. It was seen as the moment when the chance to build a unified political entity was finally lost and the empire was heading to fragmentation. The refusal of Henry the Lion in Chiavenna was the showdown between two policies, gaining ground in the east versus wasting resources in Italy.

Very few things better illustrate how intertwined German and Italian history and historical perception are than the battle of Legnano. But where the two differ now is that in Germany the memory of Barbarossa’s struggle with the Lombard league has faded far in the background, whilst in Italy it is very much alive.

The Lega, formally Lega Nord is a right-wing populist anti-immigration party led by a gentleman, and I use the word reluctantly,  called Matteo Salvini. They are the second largest party in the Italian parliament and gained 33% of the votes in the 2019 European elections.

The Lega is not called Lega by chance, it is a direct reference back to the Lombard league. Their nickname is Carrocio and their symbol is the figure of a medieval foot soldier holding up an enormous sword.

That man is Alberto da Giussano, the commander of the Milanese army at Legnano and leader of the Company of Death, an elite squad on Milanese citizen soldiers who had sworn to fight to their last breadth.  And as with so many nationalistic stories, this company of death and this man are also entirely made up. Alberto da Giussano never existed. He is the brainchild of a Dominican friar called Gaivano Fiamma who wrote in the first half of the 14th century. Just saying…..

By the way, if you want to hear an Italian recounting the battle of Legnano, head to the History of Italy by Mike Mike Corradi who covers it in episode 60 and 61.

Enough of Italian politics, what about our friend Barbarossa? Plan A has gone down the swanny, it is time for plan B. No more imperial glory but focus on dynastic consolidation. And for that he needs peace, peace with the Lombards, reconciliation with the pope, a settlement with the Sicilians, a modus vivendi with the emperor in Constantinople. And where will he get this, in Venice, the location of the first European peace congress in 1177 and of a second Canossa. I hope to see you next week.

And in the meantime, if you feel like supporting the show or want to get hold of these bonus episodes, sign up on patreon.com/historyofthegermans. All the links are in the show notes.

Barbarossa’s failed siege of Alessandria

This week we talk about Barbarossa’s next moves after his disastrous fourth Italian campaign. It takes him a few years to come to grips with the failure of his great imperial programme before he makes one last attempt to resurrect it.

Transcript

Hello and Welcome to the History of the Germans: Episode 59 – The City of Straw

As you can hear I have a terrible cold and I am afraid it is sniffle, sniffle all the way through this episode. I will re-record it as soon as I am out of it, so if you find it irritating, delete this episode and reload it in say five days.  It if you cannot wait to find out what happens next, here is episode 59.

This week we talk about Barbarossa’s next moves after his disastrous fourth Italian campaign. It takes him a few years to come to grips with the failure of his great imperial programme before he makes one last attempt to resurrect it.

This episode also has an episode website to go with it where you can find transcripts, maps and images. And this time I will even help you find the page, it is on historyofthegermans.com/59

Before we start just a reminder. The History of the Germans Podcast is advertising free thanks to the generous support from patrons. And you can become a patron too and enjoy exclusive bonus episodes and other privileges from the price of a latte per month. All you have to do is sign up at patreon.com/historyofthegermans or on my website historyofthegermans.com. You find all the links in the show notes. And thanks a lot to Florian, Hans and Karin who have already signed up.

On March 9th, 1168, Barbarossa left Italy via the pass of Mont Cenis disguised as a servant and accompanied by just a small number of attendants. He even had to leave his wife, Beatrix of Burgundy behind in the town of Susa whose inhabitants he feared were about to murder him. He arrived in Basel on March 15th, 1168, and he was not going to return to Italy before September 1174 making these 6 years the longest continuous stay in Germany during his entire reign.

So, how did he react to the catastrophe before Rome and the collapse of his imperial policy?

As we know, medieval monarchs are not exactly famous for oversharing, but we can  get  glimpses of his initial reaction from the circulars he  sent to the German princes in September 1167. That is when he was still in Italy raiding Milanese territory in a futile attempts to bring down the Lombard League.

At that time he writes, quote “the heavens were astonished and the whole world trembled at the news that certain cities of Lombardy, namely, Milan, Piacenza, Cremona, Bergamo, Brescia, Mantua and the Mark of Verona had rebelled against our majesty, against the honour of the empire without cause. The empire that had been preserved until now at great exercian and with the blood of so many illustrious men and princes”. End quote. He describes it as the “Imperium Teutonicorum”, the empire of the Germans, for the first and only time in his reign.  He goes on to say that the Italian cities no longer wished to be ruled by him or to be subject of the lordship of the Germans. But that he would rather die than leave his successors with a much-diminished Reich. This sudden outburst of nationalist sentiment is extremely unusual. Much has been made of this turn of phrase in the past, implying that people were beginning to  think in nationalist categories. But it is important to remember that this is literally the only time the term is used and that it is used at a point of extreme stress when Barbarossa is still figuring out what had gone so badly wrong. Hence  I like to see it as the exception that proves the medieval rulers did not think in nationalist categories.

A few weeks after this “honour or death” shout, he leaves Pavia to save his bacon. And, as I said, even leaves his wife behind as a decoy to escape his pursuers. That is an unexpected behaviour for the man. There was never any indication he lacked personal bravery. He was often found in the centre of the fighting, he even took on menial tasks like operated the battering ram in the siege of Crema, an effort that nearly got him burned to death.

Why did he run? It is not that he absolutely had to. He could have stayed in Pavia and if the city could withstand a siege for long enough, relief from Germany would surely have come. The princes may no longer have  been keen to support Italian campaigns, but they were honour bound to relieve their emperor.

I do not want to fall deep into armchair psychology, but it seems that Barbarossa is utterly shaken by the events of 1167. He had lost his army, he had lost Northern Italy, the funding source of his policies, he had lost Rainald von Dassel, his closest advisor, and he had lost the fight with Pope Alexander III. His standing in Europe had collapsed.

John of Salisbury wrote that quote “the ex-emperor driven out in disgrace and shame, is a fugitive and an exile from Lombardy, has thrown his own Burgundy into confusion as he passed through and has found all of Germany in uproar. Now the fall he has earned seems to be at hand” end quote.

John of Salisbury teaching philosophy, frontispiece miniature of the Policraticus by John of Salisbury, translated by Denis Foulechat.

For the next 6 months his chancery does not produce a single document. Barbarossa ceases to act as ruler, at least temporarily. Some chroniclers claim that Barbarossa had suffered a severe illness as an explanation for this inertia. Only gradually does he return to his previous levels of boundless energy.

Political priorities had to change in light of what had happened. For the first time since 1154, Germany becomes the centre of Barbarossa’s agenda.

His long absences and regular demands for military support had eroded the ability of the imperial administration to maintain peace. Feuding amongst the princes had returned with a vengeance.

In his own homeland of Swabia, the counts of Tubingen and Welf VI were tied in a deadly struggle that had pulled in both the dukes of Zaehringen and the Frederick of Rothenburg, the duke of Swabia.

Tubingen and its castle as it looked in 1643

And then his young brother, Konrad, the Count Palatinate on the Rhine fought with the archbishopric of Cologne, pitting two of the emperors closest supporters against each other..

Burg Rheineck, the cause of teh disagreement between Konrad and the archbishops of Cologne

The biggest source of turmoil was however Saxony. Henry the Lion as duke of Bavaria and duke of Saxony had become an overbearingly powerful force. Whilst Barbarossa had been in Italy, Henry had expanded his territory eastwards into what is today Mecklenburg and Pommern. These lands had been occupied by pagan Slavic peoples since the days of the Great Migration. Margrave Gero and Hermann Billlung had conquered them but they threw off the imperial yoke in 983. After that they been subject to regular raids by Saxon nobles but a permanent integration into the empire was no longer on the agenda. That changed with Lothar III It is now under Henry the Lion that these territories are permanently settled by colonists from Saxony and Flanders and cities like Lübeck, Schwerin and Rostock are established. The last purely pagan society on the Island of Rügen is forcibly Christianised in 1172.  Henry built himself the palace fortress of Dankwarderode, now in the centre of Braunschweig, a structure that rivalled any royal or imperial residence in size and splendour. In 1164 he had become engaged to the then 9-year-old daughter of king Henry II of England, Matilda. The marriage took place in 1168 with all the pomp and circumstance of a royal wedding. His position and demeanour had by now become king-like in every aspect.

Wedding of Henry teh Lion and Matilda of England

For his fellow Saxon nobles such behaviour was unacceptable. Albrecht the Bear and his sons, the Wettiner counts of Meissen and Lusatia, the Landgrave of Thuringia, the archbishops of Magdeburg and of Hamburg-Bremen formed the core of the opposition. As we have seen the Saxons have always been most insistent on their ancient rights and freedoms defending them against emperors. Nor were they willing to bend themselves to a mere duke. An veritable war broke out between Henry and the Saxon magnates which resulted in the burning of Bremen and sieges of Magdeburg and Goslar.

See Welf lands (green) and the lands of Albrecht the Baer top right in pink (unfortunately same colour as Staufer lands

Barbarossa ordered the magnates and Henry the Lion to appear before the Reichstag but the rebels did not head the call, Only upon the third summons did they show, fearing that a no-show would result in an imperial ban. Barbarossa’s efforts resulted in a truce which turned into a more permanent settlement after Albrecht the Baer had died aged 70. The settlement was however not at all equitable. Barbarossa had continued his policy of keeping the Welf on side, almost at all costs. Underlying it was the notion that a united front of the by far most powerful duke and the emperor was the best guarantee for stability.

But it wasn’t much more than stability. The reluctance of the Saxon nobles to show up for the Reichstag is a clear indication that they either did not expect a fair hearing, or worse, did no longer respect the imperial authority.

The silver lining in this otherwise quite grim time came from an unexpected windfall of the catastrophic events before Rome. Before 1168 Barbarossa had very little allodial property, i.e., property he owned in his own right. His most valuable possession was the county of Burgundy he had received through marriage to Beatrix.. His father and his uncle Konrad III had built up a large territorial powerbase stretching along the Rhine River from around Basel to outside Mainz and then along the Main River and into Nürnberg. But the majority of these lands had gone to Frederick of Rothenburg, the son of Konrad III as compensation for missing out on the crown. Rothenburg also took over as duke of Swabia from Barbarossa. Rothenburg died before Rome without an heir and Barbarossa inherits his lands.

The other magnate who died before Rome was Welf VII, the only son of Welf VI, Barbarossa’s uncle and friend. Grieving over the loss of his only son the older Welf gave himself away to a life of debauchery. Hunting, drinking, mistresses, lavish feasts and largesse drained his finances so that he sold his rights to the Lands of Matilda to Barbarossa in 1173.  His true wealth was however in the lands of Swabia around lake Constance/ Those he offered to sell to his nephew Henry the Lion, who was however too stingy to pay the old man on time. So, Barbarossa came in, provided his old friend with the means to enjoy a bit more of his carnal comforts in exchange for some of the richest lands North of the Alps.

Next one was the inheritance of Rudolf of Pfullendorf, another member of Barbarossa’s inner circle who also lost his only son before Rome. This required a bit more finesse as Rudolf was still alive and his daughter was married to the Count of Habsburg. But somehow, he finagled that one and another chunk of valuable Swabian territory came to him. To appease the Habsburgs, they were given the county of Zurich and the advocacy over the abbey of Saeckingen. So, if you had ever asked yourself how come that Wilhelm Tell and the Swiss Confederacy were oppressed by the Habsburgs, that is why.

Then there are a number of further lands he received, again mostly from his closest friends who either themselves or whose male heirs had died on his campaigns. Some he bought, some he wrestled from the heirs in ways that weren’t always cricket. I will not bore you with the names of all the places, but what he ended up with was a fairly coherent territory. If you follow along of historyofthegermans/59 you can see the map showing the Hohenstaufen controlled territories covering a lot of Southwest Germany and an extension eastward onto the modern Czech-German border. This process went on until the end of his reign at which point the personal territories of the Hohenstaufen were almost all coherent and sizeable as those of the Welf.  

Staufer lands in the south west before 1168 (left) and by the end of Barbaroissa’s reign (right)

The sudden focus on enlarging the dynastic territory is probably the biggest political U-turn of Barbarossa’s reign. Until 1168 his political concept was to create an imperial authority that lives above the squabbles of mere princes and cities. A Holy Roman Empire that is universal and can demand allegiance and support in exchange for providing security and the rule of law. The funding of that entity should come from imperial regalia rather than from the territories of the reigning monarch.

He does not give up on that notion, but his build-up of the dynastic lands of the Hohenstaufen is his plan B should the grand plan of being the undisputed leader of Christianity fail permanently.

But this is not the only strategic shift. His attitude towards the schism also shifted. His antipope Paschalis III had died in 1168 and his cardinals had elected a new anti-pope, Calixtus III. Though Barbarossa formally recognised him, he never met the antipope, he did little to support him..

The papal project had clearly failed, and Barbarossa needed to find a way out of it. His biggest constraint was the oath of Wurzburg, where he had sworn not to ever recognise Roland Bandinelli as Pope. As the emperor he could not walk away from this oath without a devastating blow to his credibility and prestige.

In 1169 he came up with a somewhat convoluted but at the same time genius plan. He had made the German princes elect his 4-year-old second son as King Henry VI. He then offered that his son would swear allegiance to Alexander III as the only pope, in exchange for a coronation. That would have solved most problems. Alexander could declare that the empire had returned into the fold of the catholic church, whilst Barbarossa would not have to break his oath. But it did not work out. Barbarossa insisted that all the bishops appointed by his antipopes like Christian of Mainz and Philip of Cologne remained in place which was something Alexander could not accept since there were archbishops of Mainz and Cologne. With two archbishops of Cologne, who will crown the new king. Schisms are messy and they get messier the longer they last.

Little Henry VI was crowned king in August 1169 in Aachen by the archbishop of Cologne, one of those appointed by the antipope. As for his two brothers, his older brother Frederick had been sickly all his life and died either before or shortly after Henry’s coronation.  Henry’s younger brother was initially called Konrad but then renamed Frederick after the death of the eldest. He became the duke of Swabia, though at the age of three his father ran the duchy for the next decade or so.

Having a son who is now king and another one who is a duke means there are options to strengthen the political position of the house of Hohenstaufen through marriages.

The oldest son had been promised to the younger daughter of King Henry II of England. But that son was now dead. And so was the relationship with King Henry II. Barbarossa had tried to forge closer ties with Henry II during the schism as the King of England had himself a major issue with the church. That issue was called Thomas a Beckett. This is not the place to go into detail on this and I assume many of you know the story anyway. But as far as we are concerned, the important point was that Pope Alexander III managed to keep both sides, the archbishop of Canterbury and King believing he was supporting them. So Henry II never really came around to the imperial side even though he did send some envoys to the oath of Wurzburg event. There was even a very brief moment after the murder of Thomas a’Beckett where Barbarossa had his hopes up that England would come across but that vanished quickly. The murder, as we know, backfired badly and Henry II had to do penance before the shrine of his now saintly adversary, which also meant that he was pretty much tied for good to Alexander III.

And that meant Barbarossa turned to Henry II’s arch-enemy, King Louis VII of France, the guy who had stood him up at the bridge near Dijon in 1164. In the world of medieval realpolitik, this was literally water under the bridge. The two monarchs meet in February 1171 on another bridge near another town. And that meeting is a lot more successful. They discover they have something in common, both do not like Henry II very much, which is enough to agree a marriage between Louis’s daughter to Henry VI. They also agreed a treaty of friendship and interestingly agreed to jointly fight the feral mercenary troops of Brabanters that had become a menace after they had returned home to the low countries from Barbarossa’s campaign. We can see a glimpse of the late middle ages here already.

That marriage however never took place because Alexander III appealed to Louis’s brother the archbishop of Reims to block it. But a bridge was built between the Hohenstaufen and the Capetians that would only strengthen over time.

That project having fallen through, another appeared on the horizon, a marriage to Maria, the daughter of emperor Manuel in Constantinople. That is a bit of a surprise, right. Last time we heard about Manuel, he had been funding the league of Verona and teamed up with Venice against the Holy Roman Empire. What happened?

The thing that always happens when 5 guys team up to kick one guy. Suddenly they realise they only ever shared one objective, defeating their enemy. Barbarossa five adversaries in the 1160s were Pope Alexander III, the Sicilians, Venice, the Lombard league and emperor Manuel. All of them felt threatened by Barbarossa’s power in Northern Italy and had buried their differences to overcome him. But now that he is gone, they realise that they have very little in common after all. The first crack appeared in the relationship between Venice and Constantinople. Manuel had been fighting for decades in the Balkans and had just occupied the coast of what is now Croatia. That was within the Venetian zone of influence. Moreover, Manuel also had sort of control of Ancona, on the opposite shore of the Adriatic. Venice was concerned that Manuel could block their shipping routes. And with good reason, because that is exactly what Manuel wanted to do. It is the whole reason why he wasted money on Italian squabbles and wanted a foothold in Italy. And Manuel was right to be afraid of the Venetians, because merely 34 years later they will put an end to the Byzantine empire of old. In 1169 Venice ordered its citizens to leave Constantinople, effectively a trade embargo. Manuel reacted by getting in touch with Pisa and Genoa to make up the shortfall and had all Venetians on his territory  arrested.  He still had a problem, his navy was no match for the Venetians. He needed to stop them to come down the Bosporus and burn his capital to the ground. The only one who could prevent that was King William of Sicily. A marriage alliance is hastily concluded and William is promised the princess Maria. So far so good, but then an epidemic breaks out in Venice and suddenly there is no longer a threat to Constantinople. Manuel who does not trust the Sicilians any more than the Venetians decides to leave William waiting by the alter, something William II of Sicily will never forgive. And so, Manuel now has a spare daughter and an open slot for an ally. Having pissed off everyone else, Barbarossa becomes a choice. Some negotiations ensue that go on until 1174 but nothing comes of it.

Byzantine empire shortly after Manuel. see teh adriatic with Ancona pointed out

An even more unexpected diplomatic effort was directed at Saladin, the ruler of Egypt and avowed enemy of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. They exchanged letters and in 1173 Saladin’s envoys come to Germany bringing gifts and the proposal of a marriage between the sultan’s son and the emperor’s daughter. That is quite something, an alliance between the enemy of the Christians in the middle east and the Holy roman empire. Anyway did not happen either.

Whilst this goes on, another line of diplomacy opens up between Barbarossa and King William II of Sicily, the unlucky suitor of little Maria. He is offered Barbarossa’s daughter Beatrice as part of an alliance between Sicily and the Holy Roman Empire. Now that is new. Ever since the Sicilians had appeared on the scene, the emperors had been fighting them tooth and nail, apart from that very first time they appeared and Conrad II made Rainulf count of Aversa in 1038.

What is clear is that the great anti-Barbarossa alliance is breaking apart. In the end their interests are not as closely aligned as they appeared. And even the imperial position in Italy had made a modest recovery. Pisa and Genoa remained at least positively disposed if not supportive of the empire. A not insignificant chunk of the Lands of Matilda in Tuscany remained loyal. The city of Rome had opened its gates to Paschalis III and even the rather useless anti-pope Calixtus III could hang on to the Holy City, at least as long as the Senate remained opposed to Alexander III.  

In 1174 Barbarossa concludes that he should make one last attempt to re-establish his old dream of the universal empire. As I said, he had invested much in his plan B and was in negotiations with all and sundry, even with Alexander III, but the dream of world domination is hard to give up.

If the grand coalition of the five major powers of Alexander III, Sicily, the Lombard League, Venice and Manuel had broken down on the back of internal differences, why wouldn’t the Lombard league break apart as well. Cremona and Milan had been at each other’s throats ever since the Italian communes had first emerged. And what about Lodi, Como, Novara, Vercelli or Bergamo, did they really live happily under Milanese hegemony? Pavia was still standing and a still an ally.

The Lombard League

In September 1174 Barbarossa appears with an army of 8000 milites in Italy. Knights they were not, but almost all mercenaries. Hardly any of the German princes had volunteered to follow their emperor across the alps. The only names that are confirmed participants in the venture apart from the usual gaggle of bishops, was Barbarossa’s brother Konrad, duke Oldrich of Bohemia who owed the emperor his position and the ever faithful Otto von Wittelsbach.

The only pass open to this army was the Mont Cenis, in what is today the French alps. That is the emergency pass, the one emperors take when things are going badly. It is the pass Henry IV took in that winter dash to hold off Gregory VII and the one Barbarossa had fled across 6 years earlier. None of the traditional routes could be taken as all of them were in the control of the League or of Venice. That led him past the town of Susa whose inhabitants wanted to kill him in his bed 6 last time he passed. Never one for mercy, he had the whole city burned to the ground.

The major alpine passes (then and now)

From there the army progress into Piedmont where they meet up with the army of the Margrave of Montferrato.  Turin and Asti opened their gates. From there, instead of following the open road to Pavia he headed to a red rag the Lombards and the pope had put in his way. That red rag was the city of Alessandria.

There are over 40 cities called Alexandria in Europe and Asia from Alexandria in Egypt, Iskenderum in Turkey,  Termez in Uzbekistan, Merv in Turkmenistan, Herat and Kandahar in Afghanistan and even half a dozen cities in Pakistan. The US alone has more than 30 cities called Alexandria.

Not any of those would have brought the wrath of the emperor upon it, because they are all named after Alexander the Great. Alessandria in Italy is not. Alessandria was created in 1168 from a couple of small settlements along the via Emilia. It was created by the Lombard League and they named it after -drumroll- Pope Alexander III. They definitely knew how to trigger this German warrior. Alessandria had to be destroyed. It did not matter that it was not even on his way towards Lombardy or that it was a modest settlement without a major garrison that could attack the supply lines. No, Alessandria had to be wiped out.it was a matter of honour and principle.

Barbarossa’s army had been further reinforced with troops from the ever-faithful city of Pavia and counted almost 20,000 men. The citizens of Alexandria most likely less than half that number were prepared to surrender as soon as the host appeared. If the city surrendered without a fight, the conventions of medieval warfare demanded that the city would remain standing. And that was a no go. Who cares about strategy and genuine military objectives when the reputation of the Empire is at stake.

The army settled down for a siege. It should have been a quick thing. Alessandria had only been founded in 1168 and its walls were not completed in stone but mostly of wood. Its defenders were the citizens of this new town reinforced by just 150 soldiers from Piacenza. The Germans called it the city of straw and believed they could make short thrift of it. But hey, were they wrong.

The founders of Alessandria may not have been able to finish the city walls in stone, but they had dug deep ditches and redirected the river to flow around the city. These turned out to be formidable barriers. The siege started in late autumn and the winter was unseasonably cold. Incessant rain turned the imperial camp into a swamp. The Bohemians deserted. Provisions were scarce. It was ridiculous, this one-horse town was resisting the might of the empire for 6 months.

At Easter 1175 Barbarossa agreed a ceasefire for the holiday and the citizens of the battered settlement agreed. It is a measure of how desperate Barbarossa is by now. Despite it being a holy day and the promise of a ceasefire he ordered 200 of his best men to enter the city through tunnels dug during the siege. His army waited outside the gates, ready to storm once the gates are opened from inside. But the invaders were spotted and killed. The gates did open, but instead of the crack team of Delta Force, the defenders sallied froward, ran down the surprised attackers and burned the siege engines with all their occupants.

The siege of Alessandria in a “patriotic” painting from 1851

On Easter Sunday, April 13th Barbarossa burned and abandoned his camp. He marched towards an approaching Lombard army that was finally sent to relieve Alessandria. The city of straw turned out to be a city of iron. 

The emperor with his chastened army of mercenaries and the whiff of sacrilege hanging over him is heading into battle against the Lombard league.

Next week we will see how this pans out. I hope you will join us again.

Before I go I have to ask you something. I have now been going for over a year with more than 60 episodes in the can. Looking back I realised that I have spent a large chunk of time on growing the audience through social media posts and the like. I do enjoy this to a degree but on balance the time would be better invested in the actual content of the podcast, the website and the offer to Patrons whose generosity keeps this whole thing going and advertising free. Thanks again to all of you lovely Patrons. Let me get to the point. Would you be prepared to put the word out about the History of the Germans? Post something on social media, maybe share one of the recent Audiograms I posted on Twitter and Facebook, forward the link to the podcast to your friends and family, or write a nice review. If you endorse the History of the Germans it is so much more powerful than me telling everyone how wonderful my podcast is. So again thanks to you all for listening and liking the podcast and see you next week.