
About Me
I am a history geek with no academic qualification in the field but a love for books and stories. I do this for fun and my personal self-aggrandisement.
I have been born, raised and educated in Germany but live in the UK for now over 20 years with my wife and two children. My professional background is in law, management consulting and banking. History has always been a hobby as are sailing, travelling, art, skiing and exercise (go BMF!).
My view of history is best summarised by Gregory of Tours (539-594): “A great many things keep happening, some good, some bad”. History has no beginning and no end and more importantly, it has no logic, no pattern and no purpose . But that does not mean there isn’t progress and sometimes we humans realise that doing the same thing again and again hoping for a different outcome is indeed madness. The great moments in history are those where we realise that we cannot go on as we were and things need to change. German history – as you will hopefully see – is full of these turning points, some good, some bad!
Subscribe to My Blog
Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.
This is a very enjoyable podcast. I like the comments about the shift in perception of historical events. E.g., former historians valued the actions of the pope against the Empire as decisive blows that prohibited the
Empire from becoming centralized and strong, whereas the modern perception is much more subtle than
that. In fact the resolution of the investiture quarrel was in the end quite similar in the Empire and in states
like France or England. It is very rewarding in this context to look at the antagonism of the ruler trying to
establish an absolute rule, and the resistance this provoked in the church, the barons, townspeople etc.
The equilibrium reached in this struggle defines the degree of centralization a state can finally reach.
These struggles were different in France, England, and Germany, but there are similarities.
I like the analysis regarding the codex of Justinian. It states that the rule of Augustus introduced autocratic
rule in exchange for peace for the people. Before Augustus, Rome was in an anarchic state of civil war, and
an autocracy offered a way out of that. So people complied. The situation was different in the early medieval
ages. An autocratic ruler would have been a mere tyrant that restricted any freedoms subordinates had. So various groups rallied against that. After much ado over centuries the compromise was a co-ruler ship with
the most powerful of these subordinates, introducing democratic elements into the governance. It is interesting
to see that during the great depression when perspectives were bleak, people again turned to autocratic
rulers like Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, or Stalin.